[lg policy] Sri Lanka: Lack of proficiency hinders language policy implementation

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Mon Sep 28 14:44:02 UTC 2009


Lack of proficiency hinders language policy implementation



By Sandun A. Jayasekera

Constitutional Affairs and National Integration Minister D.E.W.
Gunasekara lamented yesterday that there was a shortage of 300,000
officers in the public service with proficiency in a second language
to implement the official language policy. In the public service -
excluding the armed forces – the percentage proficient in a second
language in the Central Government is on average 6 and the level of
Provincial Councils and Local Government is on average 16% which is a
serious drawback to implement the official language policy enshrined
in the statute book. Secondly it is of utmost importance to be
proficient in a second language to create understanding and communal
harmony among the communities, Minister Gunasekara said yesterday.

“A series of steps have been taken for the speedy and effective
implementation of the Official Language Policy in the public service
by my Ministry by way of lump sum payments and salary increments,
making the second language compulsory for new recruits; classes at
every state institution to teach a second language and the
establishment of a National Institute of Language Education and
Training at Agalawatte are some of them,” he told the Daily Mirror.

“We have also taken a decision to appoint ‘Official Languages
Implementation Officers’ (OLIO) at each and every public institution
to ensure the full implementation of the official language policy. The
OLIO is responsible for the proper implementation of the official
language policy at Public, Provincial Councils and Local Government
institutions,” Minister Gunasekara stressed.

http://www.dailymirror.lk/DM_BLOG/Sections/frmNewsDetailView.aspx?ARTID=62900

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal.
(H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list



More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list