[lg policy] New York: Federal Panel Finds Bias in Ouster of Principal of Arabic-language public school

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Mon Mar 15 13:50:23 UTC 2010

March 12, 2010
Federal Panel Finds Bias in Ouster of Principal

A federal commission has determined that New York City’s Department of
Education discriminated against the founding principal of an
Arabic-language public school by forcing her to resign in 2007
following a storm of controversy driven by opponents of the school.
Acting on a complaint filed last year by the principal, Debbie
Almontaser, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
found that the department “succumbed to the very bias that creation of
the school was intended to dispel and a small segment of the public
succeeded in imposing its prejudices on D.O.E. as an employer,”
according to a letter issued by the commission on Tuesday. The
commission said that the department had discriminated against Ms.
Almontaser, a Muslim of Yemeni descent, “on account of her race,
religion and national origin.”

The findings, which are nonbinding, could mark a turning point in Ms.
Almontaser’s battle to reclaim her job as principal of the school, the
Khalil Gibran International Academy in Brooklyn. The commission asked
the Department of Education to reach a “just resolution” with Ms.
Almontaser and to consider her demands, which include reinstatement to
her old job, back pay, damages of $300,000 and legal fees. Should the
two sides fail to reach an agreement, the dispute will end up in
court, her lawyer said. Commission officials declined to answer
questions about the case, citing federal confidentiality law, but Ms.
Almontaser’s lawyer provided a copy of the letter to The New York

“There is no question that this is an important step in the road to
her ultimate vindication,” said Alan Levine, Ms. Almontaser’s lawyer.
“Up until now, the D.O.E. has really had its way and hasn’t had to
answer for its actions.”

In a statement, a lawyer for the city disputed the commission’s findings.

The Department of Education “in no way discriminated against Ms.
Almontaser and she will not be reinstated,” said Paul Marks, the
city’s deputy chief of labor and employment law in the Law Department.
“If she continues to pursue litigation, we will vigorously defend
against her groundless allegations.”

The controversy surrounding the dual-language school began in early
2007, shortly after the city announced that Ms. Almontaser, a longtime
teacher, would lead it. A group of opponents, including conservative
commentators and a City University trustee, mounted a campaign against
the school and Ms. Almontaser, claiming that she carried a militant
Islamic agenda.

Despite Ms. Almontaser’s longstanding reputation as a moderate Muslim,
her critics succeeded in recasting her as a “9/11 denier” and a

The conflict came to a head that August, when Ms. Almontaser’s
opponents, who had formed the Stop the Madrassa Coalition, asserted
that she was connected to T-shirts bearing the words “Intifada NYC.”
While Ms. Almontaser was on the board of an organization that rented
space to the group that distributed the shirts, she was unaware of
them, she said. (The commission determined that she had no connection
to the T-shirts.)

Nonetheless, in response to mounting inquiries about the shirts, the
Department of Education pressured her to give an interview to The New
York Post, she said. In that interview, with a department employee
listening in, she explained that the root of the word intifada meant
“shaking off,” but that it had acquired other connotations because of
the Israeli-Palestinian struggle.

The next day, The Post published the article under the headline “City
Principal Is ‘Revolting’ — Tied to ‘Intifada NYC’ Tee Shirts,” stating
that Ms. Almontaser had “downplayed the significance” of the T-shirts.
(Federal judges later issued a ruling — related to a lawsuit brought
by Ms. Almontaser — stating that The Post had reported her words
“incorrectly and misleadingly.”)

It was The Post’s article, the commission wrote in its letter this
week, that prompted the Department of Education to force Ms.
Almontaser to resign. (City officials have said that she resigned

“Significantly, it was not her actual remarks, but their elaboration
by the reporter — creating waves of explicit anti-Muslim bias from
several extremist sources — that caused D.O.E. to act,” the
commission’s letter said.

Pressure soon mounted for Ms. Almontaser to step down. Randi
Weingarten, the head of the teacher’s union, published a letter in The
Post that was sharply critical of Ms. Almontaser. She finally resigned
on Aug. 10, under pressure from the mayor’s office, she said. Mayor
Michael R. Bloomberg announced the resignation on his radio show,
saying, “she’s certainly not a terrorist,” while adding that she was
“not all that media savvy, maybe.”

Ms. Almontaser continued working with the department in an
administrative job, at her principal’s salary of about $120,000, but
that job was eliminated and she was demoted.

The lawsuit that she filed against the city, claiming that her First
Amendment rights had been violated because she was forced to resign
after saying something controversial, was dismissed. She is appealing
that decision.

A lawyer for the Stop the Madrassa Coalition said he found the
commission’s determination predictable. “I think the E.E.O.C. is
constitutionally constructed to find discrimination in a high-profile
case,” said the lawyer, David Yerushalmi.

But the development struck other lawyers as surprising. Bill Lann Lee,
a labor-law expert in San Francisco, said the commission rarely issued
such rulings, and so its decision might help Ms. Almontaser if she
pursued a discrimination lawsuit.

“The courts tend to consider what the E.E.O.C. finds,” he said, adding
that “the courts know generally that these findings are very rare, so
if there is such a finding, there’s a general belief among lawyers and
judges that there may be something there.”

Jenny Anderson and Jennifer Medina contributed reporting.


N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal.
(H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to

This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list

More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list