[lg policy] bibitem: 'Knowledge about Language': policy, rationales and practices

[Harold Schiffman]

'Knowledge about Language': policy, rationales and practices
Authors: Rosamond Mitchell - Rosamond Mitchell is a Reader in
Education, Christopher Brumfit is Professor of Language and
Linguistics in Education, and Janet Hooper is a Senior Research Fellow
at the University of Southampton.; Christopher Brumfit ;Janet Hooper
DOI: 10.1080/0267152940090204
Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year
Published in:  Research Papers in Education, Volume 9, Issue 2 June
1994 , pages 183 - 205
Subject: Educational Research;
Formats available: PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions

Single Article Purchase: US$30.00 - buy now  add to cart  [ show other
buying options ]

purchase type  customer type online access payment method price
Single Article Purchase  Any  3 days, 1 user, 3 cookies  credit card
US$30.00  buy now  add to cart
Issue Purchase  Any  permanent  credit card  US$320.84  buy now  add to cart


If you would like to pay in any other currency please see the
purchasing help pages for more information.

If you are an agent wanting to subscribe on behalf of your customer
please contact our subscriptions department on the following email
address: subscriptions at tandf.co.uk

Sign In  Online Sample
View Full Text Article
 Download PDF (~1522 KB)


Abstract
This paper provides an overview of a project funded by ESRC from
1991-1993 within the framework of the 'Quality of Teaching and
Learning' initiative, titled ' “Knowledge about Language”, Language
Learning and the National Curriculum'.

The term 'Knowledge about Language' (KAL) has become current in
curriculum debates since the late 1980s as a new title for an old
concern: that pupils learning languages in formal settings should
acquire some explicit understandings and knowledge of the nature of
language, alongside the development of practical language skills. In
this paper, we first review the range of rationales which have been
advanced in support of this position, and a number of competing
definitions of KAL, and comment on the absence of consensus achieved
so far. We then report on two empirical studies undertaken within the
project.

The main study was an empirical investigation of the teaching of
English and of modern foreign languages at year 9 in three case-study
schools, which documented teachers' current beliefs and practices with
regard to KAL through both observation and interview. We provide
accounts of the current state of year-9 pupils' knowledge in five
distinct KAL areas, elicited through a range of group discussion
tasks. Finally, we discuss year-9 pupils' use of KAL in language
performance, and the relationship between their developing
understanding of language and language learning.

In an extension study, interview data gathered by another project
within the initiative, and concerned with the effective teaching of
English and history, were re-analysed for supplementary information on
teachers' and pupils' knowledge, beliefs and practices with respect to
KAL at year 7. In addition, the place of metacomment and reflection in
the teaching of history was briefly examined.

Overall, the project revealed substantial levels of KAL-related
activity in English and modern languages, and some suggestions of its
positive contribution to learning, especially for control and planning
in writing. However, given the fragmented and episodic nature of much
KAL work, its full potential contribution to pupils' development as
language users is not currently being realized. A more consistent
developmental perspective on KAL, and further clarification of both
goals and content, are needed to guide teachers in this aspect of
their work.

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all~content=a746802244
-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list