[lg policy] Christina and, for the rest of the group, a call-to-arms
Harold Schiffman
haroldfs at GMAIL.COM
Sun Aug 21 17:13:28 UTC 2011
All,
I agree that the best medicine in these cases is to send a message to the
person whose offensive message has been shared, rather than striking
back at the person who brought the offender to our attention. That's sort
of what I have tried to convey in the message that appears at the bottom
of every posting I share.
HS
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Gareth Price <gareth.price at duke.edu> wrote:
> Christina,
>
> No worries, really ... ‘Let he who hath not pressed ‘send’ in haste
> cast the first stone’, as Jesus would have said if they'd had email
> back then.
>
> I'm impressed by your salvo (even if your aim was a little bit off) :)
>
> But this brings us to an interesting point of discussion for the group.
>
> A while back it was suggested that messages or links to things which
> are so obviously offensive, misguided, and counter-factual were not
> posted to the list.-The suggestion was quite rightly rejected for
> various reasons: chief among them, if I remember rightly, a general
> balking at the notion of censorship (which would be, ahem, a slightly
> odd policy for a *language policy* list) as well as the rather more
> broad;y articulated perspective that, without knowing about these
> kinds of opinions, and texts, it's difficult for us as educators and
> researchers to do very much about them.
>
> One thing, perhaps, we *can* do about them in a concrete,
> activist-oriented way, is to write letters to these commentators, and
> the editors of their publications refuting what they say - on
> linguistic, cultural, sociological or political grounds. They probably
> won't be published, they may not even be read; but even if they were
> read it might make editors and contributors think twice about bandying
> about this kind of nonsense. In fact, even if nothing happened, then
> it would potentially be an interesting research exercise in and of
> itself: at what point can, or does, activism on language related
> issues work? Where are the pressure points? Who do we need to be
> educating here?
>
> Ronald Kephart at UFla is in (thanks Ronald!), Christina's said she's in also.
>
> Any other thoughts from the rest of the group?
>
> Best,
>
> Gareth
>
> Gareth,
> A million apologies, no I didn't realize it was a quotation from
> Lindsay Johns (who he?) and I was sad to see the quotation under your
> name. One of my students e-mailed me to set me straight. If it can
> be done.
> I am so sorry -- I really should have known better. It is an issue I
> have fought against all my life, especially in my many teacher
> training courses ( yes, I know that one should call them tchr
> education courses or similar). My own son - in third grade -- came
> home and said "ain' t" was not a word,
> etc.
> Again, I am so sorry. Christina
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gareth Price
> Visiting Assistant Professor
> Department of Slavic and Eurasian Studies
> 316 Languages Building, Box 90259
> Duke University
> Durham, NC 27708-0259
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
> lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
> To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
>
--
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Harold F. Schiffman
Professor Emeritus of
Dravidian Linguistics and Culture
Dept. of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305
Phone: (215) 898-7475
Fax: (215) 573-2138
Email: haroldfs at gmail.com
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/
-------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list
mailing list