[lg policy] Malaysia: English language policy still salvageable

Tue Nov 1 14:27:41 UTC 2011

English language policy still salvageable
NEWS/COMMENTARIES

Sunday, 30 October 2011 Aurora

By Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim, The Star

All education stakeholders are urged to lend their support to the
campaign to make the Government allow for the PPSMI to be retained in
schools that want it. THE Parent Action Group for Education Malaysia
(PAGE) is on its last leg in appealing for the visionary policy of the
Teaching and Learning of Science and Mathematics in English (PPSMI) to
be given as an option in national primary and secondary schools where
parents wish it.

The Education Act 1996 stipulates that “pupils are to be educated
according to the wishes of their parents”, not teachers, not
principals, not PTAs and, most definitely, not politicians or deluded
national language linguists. Prior to the Sarawak polls, the Prime
Minister said: “Let us consider the option” and this was immediately
backed by the Deputy Prime Minister/Education Minister, although
rather awkwardly for the Government, it was not echoed by the Deputy
Education Minister II.

However, six months have passed and the Education Ministry continues
to drag its feet, knowing full well that time is running out for us,
parents, taxpayers, voters, we who pay their salaries. When PPSMI was
conceived in 2002, its objective was to address the poor employability
of graduates, in particular the Malays.

It was vital for young Malaysians to acquire scientific knowledge, and
be renowned in the field, before we could even envision Bahasa
Malaysia as an international language, let alone a language of
scientific knowledge. Fortunately, the language of knowledge is
English, which we have been exposed to for half a century, unlike many
other countries that continue to struggle.

The then Cabinet endorsed the decision for students to be taught these
two constantly evolving subjects in its lingua franca. Many of the
same Cabinet ministers who agreed with PPSMI then continue to sit on
the same Cabinet that abolished it.

The Academy of Sciences Malaysia was sought by the Government for
their professional advice. While sourcing for scientific material in
Indonesia, the largest Malay-speaking country in the world, the
scientists there suggested that we should just stick to the English
references, as they did not have any to show themselves.

The academy still stands by its opinion that PPSMI should continue.
The president, in a column in May, wrote: “Much of the scientific
references are in English. A recent announcement to review the policy
is welcome.”

The then Education Minister, the only technocrat ever to lead the
Education Ministry and who holds seven honorary doctorates in science
to date, was adamant that the policy would succeed.

He set in place an implementation committee, which he headed as
chairman, encapsulating a strict regime of controls and intervention
programmes, which, if conformed to, could have made a tremendous
success of the policy. The PPSMI unit in the ministry was the place to
be and the envy of many.

Knowing full well the challenges, such as teacher competency and
proficiency, coupled with poor computer literacy, ICT was introduced
on a large scale and relied upon to bridge the shortfall between
resources available and needed.

The latest in hardware and carefully designed software which were
pedagogically correct were acquired, and numerous short courses in
English were embarked upon.

On top of that, a cash allowance was offered to the science and
mathematics teachers to use the money to further improve their English
proficiency.

Sadly, in 2004, the technocrat minister completed his term, and PPSMI
was abandoned without the leadership it so badly needed.

Come late 2007, rumblings were heard. These were not from the rural
folk but from self-acclaimed clerics, linguists and politicians.

In 2008, the not-so-new Education Minister sought views from
stakeholders on the policy. In 2009, the policy was abolished by the
Deputy Prime Minister/Education Minister, three months into his
portfolio and well before a government and an education blueprint was
put in place.

Now the Government is talking of an education transformation. The
transformation was already taking place before their very eyes,
initiated by the Government itself, before it was prematurely
decapitated – a case of self-infliction.

Yet the students continue to perform in Science, Mathematics and
English without relegating Bahasa Malaysia. The rural students even
outperform their urban friends in science, as has been pointed out by
the director-general.

As we understand it, a government policy is to be carried out by the
minister and his/her respective ministry.

As far as the Education Ministry is concerned, the teachers should
have been prepared and required to ensure the policy succeeds, as is
stated in their code of ethics.

Instead, the ministry faulted its teachers for being incompetent when
the ministry itself had failed to ensure the controls which were
already in place were strictly adhered to.

Naturally, by the time studies were conducted to review the success of
the policy, it had reached a stage of declination.

PAGE believes PPSMI is still salvageable. And we are not alone.
Jaringan Melayu Malaysia (JMM), which represents rural parents, also
feels the same. JMM has an incredible online Malay base that is not to
be underestimated.

The Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS), Malaysia’s
second leading think tank, has fallen in line too with its founder
president, giving the much needed royal endorsement.

Together, we believe that the option must be given to parents to
represent their children, and no one else.

Parents in Penang and Malacca are very restless. Parents in Selangor
are gathering themselves together again. So are those in Kuala Lumpur.
Do not underestimate the parents in Perak and Johor either.

We urge all education stakeholders to e-mail us your support as we
want to collaborate with groups of influence to show to the Government
that we are not all urban and neither are we isolated.

Let us put the past behind us and begin afresh. Let us instead start
small, with the schools that parents want PPSMI to be retained, but
allow the option to other schools to be able to do the same in the
future.

Double the cash allowance for the Science and Mathematics teachers who
enjoy and want to continue teaching these subjects in English.

Visit www.pagemalaysia.org to vote for the “Yes to PPSMI Option” and
send the link to everyone you know, students included. Also look out
for the Facebook poll “1M Malaysians Say Yes to PPSMI as an Option”,
add your friends to the group, and get your friends to do the same.
Make it viral.

Let us turn this into a success story for our children, for Malaysia
and for many under-developed and developing countries to emulate.

PAGE is a national education watchdog. Kudos to our past Education
Ministers for enlightening us on the benefits of a good education
which we have enjoyed and now want for our children.

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/44549-english-language-policy-still-salvageable

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list