[lg policy] Malta: English should be language of instruction

Wed Oct 26 15:02:26 UTC 2011

English should be language of instruction -

By James Debono

Labour’s education spokesperson Evarist Bartolo is proposing that
English should replace Maltese as the language of instruction in
schools.

Replying to a parliamentary question by Bartolo, Education Minister
Dolores Cristina was non-committal, insisting that any decision on
whether English should be the language of instruction in schools has
to be analysed by those drafting the national language policy in the
new curriculum. But Evarist Bartolo’s suggestion was shot down by
linguist and President of the National Council for the Maltese
language, Manwel Mifsud.

Bartolo contends that making English the language of instruction in
schools will ultimately benefit students. Speaking to MaltaToday,
Bartolo argued that students who become competent in the use of
English will get on in life and do better. “Billions of dollars are
spent worldwide in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language as
millions of people realise that they need a global language to
participate fully in the world of the 21s century”.

The greater use of English will also make children more conversant
with modern technology. “Children at the age of three and four are
already coming into contact with IT software, which is in English. If
they do not start learning English at such a young age, they will fall
behind”. Bartolo contends that there is close connection between the
digital divide and the language divide.

“Our students need to know English well to get on in other subjects as
all our text books are in English”. Bartolo also expressed
disappointment at the Minister’s reply to his question, arguing that
Malta has already missed a decade when this issue was shelved in the
last curriculum revision in 2000. He refers to national conference was
held on the subject in 2000, when lots of papers were published but no
decision was taken.

“I hope that the same does not happen now. The framework that has been
published does not have the courage to propose what is to be done
regarding the language of instruction. That is wrong, and a big
failure in the framework”.

Bartolo lashes at ‘linguistic Talibans’

Bartolo insists that making English the language of instruction in
schools will not have a negative impact on the Maltese language.

“I love the Maltese language. I love Maltese literature and we must do
all we can to enhance its use and all our children must become
competent in Maltese as well”.

Bartolo is aware that his proposal is bound to be controversial and
that “some linguistic Talibans were shocked” that he is proposing
English to be the language of instruction in our schools.

“But I will stick to that proposal. Other countries like Singapore
have taken that decision and it has helped them enormously with moving
ahead in terms of economic development without destroying their
cultural identity and different endogenous languages on the island”.

Bartolo insists that we should not look at the language policy in
schools as some zero-sum game as students need competence in both
English and Maltese.

“I was born and brought up in a family where only Maltese was used but
we were exposed to English through the extensive library we had at
home. Whenever I read a book in English I never felt I was betraying
the Maltese language, or vice versa”.

But for such a system to work, Malta needs massive training programme
for our teachers to make them feel adequate in English. It is only
then that they will be able to help children learn English.

“We need to use the know-how we have in the TEFL sector to pass on
skills and methodologies to teach English well. We also need to
improve the way we teach Maltese. We need to have our children feel
multilingual in our globalised world”.

Bartolo not in line with UNESCO principles –Manwel Mifsud

Contacted by MaltaToday, National Council for the Maltese language
President Manwel Mifsud expressed his disagreement with Bartolo’s
proposal, insisting that this goes against the advice of the United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.

He refers to the first principle of the UNESCO Guidelines on Language
and Education, which state that: “UNESCO supports mother tongue
instruction as a means of improving educational quality by building
upon the knowledge and experience of the learners and teachers”.

According to UNESCO, mother tongue instruction “is essential for
initial instruction and literacy and should be extended to as late a
stage in education as possible: every pupil should begin his [or her]
formal education in his [or her] mother tongue.”

Mifsud expressed his agreement with Bartolo that proficiency in the
English language is of great importance in today’s world.

“But am very worried when I see our leaders in the educational sector
lose their heads so quickly. It is a pity that, when facing the storm
generated by globalisation, the first thing that they think of
throwing overboard is the Maltese language, which is the source of our
identity and therefore very important in our children’s education”.

Misud also contends that Bartolo’s opinion runs contrary to the
Maltese Language Act, which was unanomously approved by parliament in
2004, which states that the State must ‘promote through all possible
means the widest use of the Maltese Language in education,
broadcasting and the media, at the law courts, and in political,
administrative, economic, social and cultural life.’

He also contrasts the views of Bartolo to those of Opposition Leader
Joseph Muscat who, when opening the Convention for Maltese Living
Abroad in 2009, argued that students who prefer using Maltese in
university examinations should not be penalised.

“We are reassured by these authoritative declarations which safeguard
the place of Maltese in the educational sector. We hope that in view
of these statements, Bartolo will also change his position,” Mifsud
said.

http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/2011/1025/english-should-be-language-of-instruction-labour-mp-evarist-bartolo

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list