[lg policy] Canada: Will Huffpost Quebec Help End Language Apartheid?

[Harold Schiffman]

Will Huffpost Quebec Help End Language Apartheid?
Posted: 02/ 8/2012 8:52 am



What better way to celebrate the Huffington Post's entry into the
Quebec market than to remind the world of its segregation laws.

Quebec segregates the rights of its own residents through The Charter
of the French Language, commonly known as Bill 101. The most
significant of several provisions that violate fundamental human
rights are the language of education provisions which divide Quebecers
into two separate and distinct civil rights categories:

1) those who can choose to send their children to either
French-language or English-language publicly-funded schools; and

2) those who can only send their children to French-language
publicly-funded schools.

The discrimination procedure used to determine placement in either of
these two civil rights categories is based upon:

1) whose one's parents are; and

2) what the parents' classification is (i.e., eligibility certificate).

This classification is handed down, generation after generation.

This regime of discrimination based upon descent violates the basic
tenet of a free and democratic society that all are equal under the
law.

Indeed, the language of Bill 101 used in the discrimination process
described above is identical in principle to the one used under the
now defunct apartheid system of South Africa. It is, in places,
virtually word for word.

Quebec's school segregation laws have decimated the English language
school system, and its community.

In 1970, there were 250,000 students in Quebec's English-language
school system. This had declined by 57 per cent to 108,000 by 1990 and
slowly edged back to 122,834 by 2003.

There is a further asymmetry of rights in this regard.

Prior to enactment of Quebec's language laws, immigrants to Quebec
could freely choose to send their children to either English or French
publicly-funded schools. Now they can't.

The Quebec government -- both separatist and non-separatist alike --
have been unwilling to put into effect section 23.1.a of Canada's
Charter of Rights and freedoms because they refuse to enact the
provisions of section 59 of Canada's constitution. As a result, an
inequality exists between Quebec and all other Canadian provinces.

Immigrants from French-speaking countries, such as France, whose first
language is French, can come to any of the English-speaking provinces
outside Quebec, become citizens, and have the constitutional right to
send their children to French publicly-funded schools.

However, immigrants from English-speaking countries, such as the
United States, whose first language is English, and who come to Quebec
and become citizens, do not have the constitutional right to send
their children to English publicly-funded schools.

All it would take to eliminate this inequality is a proclamation by
the legislation or government of Quebec.

Bill 101 has attempted to eradicate the English language from Quebec
since its inception. Only numerous rulings from domestic and
international courts have held Quebec's human rights violations in
check.

For example, in December 1988, Quebec overrode a unanimous Supreme
Court of Canada decision that found the language of commercial signs
provisions of Bill 101 in violation of both Quebec's and Canada's
Charters of Rights and officially suspended freedom of speech and
equality rights. Then-Premier Robert Bourassa, the author of the law,
bragged that "we have suspended fundamental liberties."

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/tony-kondaks/quebec-language-law_b_1244894.html

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list