[lg policy] They=?windows-1252?Q?=92re=2C_?=Like, Way Ahead of the Linguistic Currrve

Mon Feb 27 22:52:36 UTC 2012

They’re, Like, Way Ahead of the Linguistic Currrve
By DOUGLAS QUENQUA

>>From Valley Girls to the Kardashians, young women have long been mocked for
the way they talk.  Whether it be uptalk (pronouncing statements as if they
were questions? Like this?), creating slang words like “bitchin’ ” and
“ridic,” or the incessant use of “like” as a conversation filler, vocal
trends associated with young women are often seen as markers of immaturity
or even stupidity.

Right?

But linguists — many of whom once promoted theories consistent with that
attitude — now say such thinking is outmoded. Girls and women in their
teens and 20s deserve credit for pioneering vocal trends and popular slang,
they say, adding that young women use these embellishments in much more
sophisticated ways than people tend to realize.

“A lot of these really flamboyant things you hear are cute, and girls are
supposed to be cute,” said Penny Eckert, a professor of linguistics at
Stanford University. “But they’re not just using them because they’re
girls. They’re using them to achieve some kind of interactional and
stylistic end.”

The latest linguistic curiosity to emerge from the petri dish of girl
culture gained a burst of public recognition in December, when researchers
from Long Island University published a paper about it in The Journal of
Voice. Working with what they acknowledged was a very small sample —
recorded speech from 34 women ages 18 to 25 — the professors said they had
found evidence of a new trend among female college students: a guttural
fluttering of the vocal cords they called “vocal fry.”

A classic example of vocal fry, best described as a raspy or croaking sound
injected (usually) at the end of a sentence, can be heard when Mae West
says, “Why don’t you come up sometime and see me,” or, more recently on
television, when Maya Rudolph mimics Maya Angelou on “Saturday Night Live.”

Not surprisingly, gadflies in cyberspace were quick to pounce on the study
— or, more specifically, on the girls and women who are frying their words.
“Are they trying to sound like Kesha or Britney Spears?” teased The
Huffington Post, naming two pop stars who employ vocal fry while singing,
although the study made no mention of them. “Very interesteeeaaaaaaaaang,”
said Gawker.com, mocking the lazy, drawn-out affect.

Do not scoff, says Nassima Abdelli-Beruh, a speech scientist at Long Island
University and an author of the study. “They use this as a tool to convey
something,” she said. “You quickly realize that for them, it is as a cue.”

Other linguists not involved in the research also cautioned against forming
negative judgments.

“If women do something like uptalk or vocal fry, it’s immediately
interpreted as insecure, emotional or even stupid,” said Carmen Fought, a
professor of linguistics at Pitzer College in Claremont, Calif. “The truth
is this: Young women take linguistic features and use them as power tools
for building relationships.”

The idea that young women serve as incubators of vocal trends for the
culture at large has longstanding roots in linguistics. As Paris is to
fashion, the thinking goes, so are young women to linguistic innovation.

“It’s generally pretty well known that if you identify a sound change in
progress, then young people will be leading old people,” said Mark
Liberman, a linguist at the University of Pennsylvania, “and women tend to
be maybe half a generation ahead of males on average.”

Less clear is why. Some linguists suggest that women are more sensitive to
social interactions and hence more likely to adopt subtle vocal cues.
Others say women use language to assert their power in a culture that, at
least in days gone by, asked them to be sedate and decorous. Another theory
is that young women are simply given more leeway by society to speak
flamboyantly.

But the idea that vocal fads initiated by young women eventually make their
way into the general vernacular is well established. Witness, for example,
the spread of uptalk, or “high-rising terminal.”

Starting in America with the Valley Girls of the 1980s (after immigrating
from Australia, evidently), uptalk became common among young women across
the country by the 1990s.

In the past 20 years, uptalk has traveled “up the age range and across the
gender boundary,” said David Crystal, a longtime professor of linguistics
who teaches at Bangor University in Wales. “I’ve heard grandfathers and
grandmothers use it,” he said. “I occasionally use it myself.”

Even an American president has been known to uptalk. “George W. Bush used
to do it from time to time,” said Dr. Liberman, “and nobody ever said, ‘Oh,
that G.W.B. is so insecure, just like a young girl.’ ”

The same can be said for the word “like,” when used in a grammatically
superfluous way or to add cadence to a sentence. (Because, like, people
tend to talk this way when impersonating, like, teenage girls?) But in
2011, Dr. Liberman conducted an analysis of nearly 12,000 phone
conversations recorded in 2003, and found that while young people tended to
use “like” more often than older people, men used it more frequently than
women.

And, actually? The use of “like” in a sentence, “apparently without meaning
or syntactic function, but possibly as emphasis,” has made its way into the
Webster’s New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition — this newspaper’s
reference Bible — where the example given is: “It’s, like, hot.” Anyone who
has seen a television show featuring the Kardashian sisters will be more
than familiar with this usage.

“Like” and uptalk often go hand in hand. Several studies have shown that
uptalk can be used for any number of purposes, even to dominate a listener.
In 1991, Cynthia McLemore, a linguist at the University of Pennsylvania,
found that senior members of a Texas sorority used uptalk to make junior
members feel obligated to carry out new tasks. (“We have a rush event this
Thursday? And everyone needs to be there?”)

Dr. Eckert of Stanford recalled a study by one of her students, a woman who
worked at a Jamba Juice and tracked instances of uptalking customers. She
found that by far the most common uptalkers were fathers of young women.
For them, it was “a way of showing themselves to be friendly and not
asserting power in the situation,” she said.

Vocal fry, also known as creaky voice, has a long history with English
speakers. Dr. Crystal, the British linguist, cited it as far back as 1964
as a way for British men to denote their superior social standing. In the
United States, it has seemingly been gaining popularity among women since
at least 2003, when Dr. Fought, the Pitzer College linguist, detected it
among the female speakers of a Chicano dialect in California.

A 2005 study by Barry Pennock-Speck, a linguist at the University of
Valencia in Spain, noted that actresses like Gwyneth Paltrow and Reese
Witherspoon used creaky voice when portraying contemporary American
characters (Ms. Paltrow used it in the movie “Shallow Hal,” Ms. Witherspoon
in “Legally Blonde”), but not British ones in period films (Ms. Paltrow in
“Shakespeare in Love,” Ms. Witherspoon in “The Importance of Being
Earnest”).

So what does the use of vocal fry denote? Like uptalk, women use it for a
variety of purposes. Ikuko Patricia Yuasa, a lecturer in linguistics at the
University of California, Berkeley, called it a natural result of women’s
lowering their voices to sound more authoritative.

It can also be used to communicate disinterest, something teenage girls are
notoriously fond of doing.

“It’s a mode of vibration that happens when the vocal cords are relatively
lax, when sublevel pressure is low,” said Dr. Liberman. “So maybe some
people use it when they’re relaxed and even bored, not especially aroused
or invested in what they’re saying.”

But “language changes very fast,” said Dr. Eckert of Stanford, and most
people — particularly adults — who try to divine the meaning of new forms
used by young women are “almost sure to get it wrong.”

“What may sound excessively ‘girly’ to me may sound smart, authoritative
and strong to my students,” she said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/28/science/young-women-often-trendsetters-in-vocal-patterns.html?_r=1&hp

-- 
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

 Harold F. Schiffman

Professor Emeritus of
 Dravidian Linguistics and Culture
Dept. of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305

Phone:  (215) 898-7475
Fax:  (215) 573-2138

Email:  haroldfs at gmail.com
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/

-------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20120227/ee40b943/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list