[lg policy] Irish language endangered by austerity measures

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Tue Mar 6 15:40:27 UTC 2012

Irish language endangered by austerity measures


OPINION: THE VIBRANT Seachtain na Gaeilge festival runs nationally
until March 17th, with tomorrow a Lá Gaeilge in the Dáil. At the same
time, Irish language groups are campaigning against the effects of
funding cuts on the language. So what is the state of the language and
how might the current recession affect it?

Efforts to revive the language date from the founding by Douglas Hyde
of the Gaelic League in 1893. Hyde’s view of the language as a vehicle
for national identity led to the league becoming a mass movement and
inspired many in the independence movement, including Michael Collins
and Éamon de Valera.

Since independence, all governments have supported the language and,
90 years on, the evidence suggests these policies have had mixed

The main policy focus (perhaps to an unbalanced extent) has been the
education system. In many ways, achievements here are disappointing
compared to inputs. Despite the time spent between ages four and 18,
it is shocking how few young people finish school able to speak Irish
fluently. Such poor outcomes would be unacceptable in most subjects
(the exceptions perhaps being other languages). Reasons for the poor
outcomes include a traditional over-emphasis on grammar, a continuing
lack of creativity in how the language is taught, and a strikingly
high number of teachers who cannot themselves speak the language.

On the other hand, the work of the schools has led to the number of
people who say they can speak Irish rising from 20 per cent of the
population in the 1920s to more than 40 per cent today.

The 2006 census showed that 1.66 million people have an ability to
speak Irish, with more than half a million people using Irish every
day. This included more than 72,000 people who spoke Irish daily
outside the education system.

As such, there has been some movement towards a bilingual society,
although Ireland is clearly no Canada or Belgium. But with
high-quality television and radio channels in Irish, print and online
media, a lively cultural scene and a right for citizens to obtain
State services through the language, there have been real

Opinion polls consistently show that strong public support for Irish
(despite a minority who don’t seem to “get” the language) and the
vibrant Gaelscoil movement, as well as growth in the use of Irish in
Northern Ireland, represent strong sources of optimism. (Research
suggests one in four parents would send their child to a Gaelscoil if
available.) While many languages around the world died in the 20th
century, Irish is very much alive.

A crucial exception to this optimism is the decline in the use of
Irish in Gaeltacht areas. This is primarily due to these communities
being largely rural and remote (why the language survived in the first
place), and so having the economic tide against them. While the value
of the language in these areas is firstly to those who live there, who
tap directly into a rich Gaelic heritage, these communities provide
inspiration for all who speak Irish.

However, the sad truth is that we may be living through the last years
of Irish as a community language in most Gaeltacht areas.

Drawing on all-party support, a 20-year strategy for the language was
published in December 2010. It has two central targets: to increase
the number in the State who use Irish daily outside the education
system to 250,000 by 2030, and to increase the number of daily
speakers in Gaeltacht areas by 25 per cent. The 250,000 figure
represents 5-7 per cent of the expected 2030 population. Given general
positive views on the language and the numbers learning Irish in
Gaelscoileanna and other schools, this objective should be achievable,
if there is a will to achieve it.

Unfortunately, the strategy entered the world in a time of austerity.
So how is the Fine Gael/Labour Coalition performing on the language?

On the positive side, the recent Gaeltacht Bill suggests commitment to
the strategy. As well as focusing on the urgent challenges facing
Gaeltacht areas in keeping the language alive, an innovative part of
the Bill will allow any area where large numberS of Irish language
speakers live or work to become a “Gaeltacht network” (groups in both
Clondalkin and Co Clare are already looking at this). New “Gaeltacht”
areas, with a range of outlets for people to use Irish, could generate
local pride and create virtuous circles of language visibility and

On the other hand, the national austerity is having detrimental
effects and particularly negative decisions include:

The proposal to merge the Office of the Irish Language Commissioner
with the Office of the Ombudsman, which will lead to almost no
savings, but may well affect the rights of Irish speakers;

The cutting of grants to trainee teachers to spend time in the
Gaeltacht. This is particularly illogical as trainee teachers need
more and not less time in the Gaeltacht;

Reduced funding for small Gaeltacht schools.

The risk is that spending cuts from different Government departments
could, taken together, undermine the “horizontal” Government objective
of supporting the language. There is an urgent need for the Cabinet
committee on the Irish language to take a “joined-up” view to ensure
the 20-year strategy is given high-level leadership and oversight.

Otherwise, personal support from Taoiseach Enda Kenny and Tánaiste
Eamon Gilmore may not prevent the recession doing considerable damage
to Irish.

Indeed, drawing on the ideas of Douglas Hyde, the deeper European
integration being driven by the economic crisis suggests a need for
new ways to assert national identity. In this context, there is now an
opportunity for the language to become part of a wider national
rejuvenation, a confident assertion of who we are in an integrated
global economy.

Bainigí sult as imeachtaí Seachtain na Gaeilge!

N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to

This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list

More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list