[lg policy] bibitem: Arabization and Language Policy: The Case of Morocco and Algeria

mostari hind hmostari at YAHOO.COM
Wed Mar 21 15:39:54 UTC 2012


Hi, 
As a writer of many articles  on the Arabisation policies in Algeria , we should be very careful in order not to generalise the cases of Arabisation in both Algeria and Morocco since the former was colonised by France during 132 years while  in the latter , only some towns were under the french protectorate such as the internal towns like Casablanca , Rabat, Marakech, Fés, and Kenitra were under the French protectorate (1912-1956) . 
The proof is that the Algerian president Bouteflika who studied in Morocco is the most proficient Algerian president in speaking Modern Standard Arabic ,and that's why , the Moroccans are very  often good speakers of CA than the Algerians who MUST almost always refer to french stretches  of language in order to save their message .
 
Best ,
Mostari
Algeria 





From: Harold Schiffman <hfsclpp at gmail.com>
Subject: [lg policy] bibitem: Arabization and Language Policy: The Case of Morocco and Algeria
To: "lp" <lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu>
Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2012, 2:46 PM



Arabization and Language Policy: The Case of Morocco and Algeria

Written on March 20, 2012 by Bouchra in History, Language, Leadership, Politics 


Using one language as the medium of instruction seems to be inevitably successful in some countries. However, in multilingual societies such as Morocco and Algeria, basing education on one medium of instruction results in the failure of the whole educational system. In this article, I plan to talk about Arabization, which was implemented as a language policy and a medium of instruction in Morocco and Algeria in the 60s. All textbooks, road signs and government documents were translated from French to Arabic. Unfortunately, the then newly introduced policy did not seem to work well neither in either country, the weaknesses of the policy are still visible in the population of these two North African countries, especially Morocco.
Arabization policy is aimed at the spread of the use of Arabic by the suppression of French and other local languages such as colloquial Arabic and Tamazight. Before proceeding to the implementation of the Arabization policy, authorities should have considered the fact that Arabic needed a thorough terminology coining for the teaching of science and technology. Consequently, the weakness of Arabic to fulfill the needs of education led Algerians to maintain the use of French. Similarly, by the time the first Arabized student cohort reached higher education, Morocco’s Ministry of Education had no other choice, but to decree a new law that allowed the use of French in universities despite the pressure exerted in elementary schools. As a response, attempts were made to enrich Arabic’s vocabulary, but the fact that Arabic required the use of many words to express one word in French or English led to more confusion and impreciseness. This handicap made the
 Arabization policy an unbalanced, inconsistent and incomplete one, which resulted in the low proficiency of lots of students in both languages: Standard Arabic and French.
Moreover, the disaster was the unpreparedness of students to deal with French as they were not allowed to become proficient enough in it to pursue more complex fields of studies such as mathematics, engineering or biology. As a result, the standards of the institutions declined dramatically because students struggled first and foremost with French and then the content. It would be false to generalize about student proficiency in French. Some were able to talk about their field of studies in French, but not in Arabic.
Some people claim that Arabization was intended to separate between the elite and other social classes in order to reduce competition for the prestigious and highly paid careers. Thus, the elite made sure that their children grew up more proficient in French than Arabic since French has always been the language of commerce in Morocco. It is a well-respected Moroccan norm to speak French better than Arabic because of its social capital. The other aim behind Arabization is the strive for a monolingual nation and for an Arab-Islamic identity that is independent from all western and internal influence. Arabization policy leaders have ignored that both Algeria and Morocco are linguistically diverse. Consequently, Tamazight speakers started to be very active in promoting the consideration and use of their languages and won the battle only at the end of 2011 when Tamazight became an official language after the amendment of the Moroccan constitution.
The elite did not want to have many competitors in jobs that pay big salaries and they were smart enough to educate their children either in French schools or in prestigious private schools. This interpretation could also be extended and related to current events and claim that authorities wanted to reduce the percentage of educated people because the government may not be able to employ all the youths and unemployment would be a difficult thing to deal with, especially at this time that most revolutions in the Arab world resulted from the high rate of unemployment, corruption and inequality of opportunities.
The leaders know very well how students in the 60s and the 70s were successful, knowledgeable and intelligent bilinguals. Leaving French as the medium of instruction in higher education was perhaps meant to be an impediment for students to face problems and challenges which will result in their low qualification for the job market. However, some of the students managed to become proficient in French by practice and the hard work they devoted to the language along with the course content.
http://bokamosoafrica.org/2012/03/arabization-and-language-policy-the-case-of-morocco-and-algeria.html




-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20120321/950e7143/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list


More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list