[lg policy] Chinese teacher visa controversy resolved

[Harold Schiffman]

Chinese teacher visa controversy resolved
Updated: 2012-05-27 07:45
By Tan Yingzi in Washington (China Daily)


Within 24 hours of consultations between officials from the Chinese
embassy and the US State Department, a revised policy directive was
sent out on Friday to clarify the visa status of Chinese-language
teachers. The new version clarifies that the Confucius Institutes run
by accredited US universities and colleges do not need to apply for
another accreditation.

To ensure the smooth operation of Chinese language programs, the
Chinese teachers with the wrong type of visa will not be required to
leave the United States at the end of this academic year, as was
reported last week. The State Department will assist such teachers to
get their visa category corrected with their designated sponsor.

The previous directive, issued on May 17, raised confusion and
concerns among US universities that sponsor Confucius Institutes, the
well-established programs China's government uses to promote Chinese
language and culture around the world. The earlier directive also
created a stir back in China, where people began to ask whether such
people-to-people exchanges were welcomed by Americans.

The May 17 document has stated that any faculty member working through
a college's J-1 exchange program is violating visa rules if teaching
students of elementary- or secondary-school age. Such teachers would
have been required to return to China by June 30 to reapply for an
appropriate program.

That interpretation would have forced at least 51 Chinese teachers to
leave the US. About 600 currently work in the US, according to the
Confucius Institute Headquarters, more commonly known as Hanban.

The original directive also demanded that Confucius Institutes obtain
US accreditation to continue accepting foreign scholars and professors
as teachers.

Since the first institute in the US was established at the University
of Maryland in 2005, there are 81 Confucius Institutes across the
country and such accreditation has not been required before.

Fang Maotian, minister counselor for education affairs at the Chinese
embassy in Washington, said he regretted that the State Department did
not notify the Chinese side in advance about the May 17 directive,
which could have affected many Chinese teachers and Chinese language
programs in the US.

But after "candid" talks with US counterparts Thursday afternoon, he
agreed that the document was not targeted at the Confucius Institutes,
but rather a "routine check" and a "technical issue" over the visa
status of all foreign exchange teachers on US campuses.

"It's just a follow-up of the annual visa status check of exchanges
visitors across the country in January," Fang told reporters at a
briefing Friday afternoon.

"We always respect the US laws and regulations. And we will closely
follow the development of this issue."

He said both sides need to improve communication and consultation to
avoid such misunderstanding and confusion in the future.

US State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland reiterated Friday at
the daily press briefing that people-to-people relations with China
are a very high priority for the US. She described the first directive
as "sloppy and not complete" for causing the confusion.

"We regret the fact that the first notice was not our best work and
we've now endeavored to fix this," she said.

tanyingzi at chinadailyusa.com

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/sunday/2012-05/27/content_15395494.htm

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list