[lg policy] Ukraine: Parliamentary fights: What is the principle of the language policy?

Tue May 29 15:11:17 UTC 2012

Parliamentary fights: What is the principle of the language policy?

Last Thursday, May 24, the parliament was supposed to consider the
draft bill on language policy, but failed. MPs from the Party of
Regions faction had a fight with Our Ukraine and BYuT representatives.
When the fight started speaker Volodymyr Lytyvn closed the session and
left the presidium.

The next day the parliament also failed to consider the draft bill, as
BYuT MPs started blocking the parliament from early morning. The
opposition believes that the given draft bill is simply aimed at
granting the state language status to the Russian language.

As a reminder, the draft bill stipulates that the Ukrainian language
is the only state language in Ukraine, and narrowing of its
application sphere is prohibited. At the same time the draft bill
recognizes the right for language freedom and forbids limiting the
right of use of regional languages. There are 15 regional languages in
Ukraine, including Russian, Crimean-Tatar and Romanian.

The status of regional language can be granted to a language if at
least 10% of the region's population speaks it. Regional languages can
be officially used in pre-election, judicial and notarial
documentation, school tests, exams and colloquiums, paperwork of local
governments and official correspondence with central authorities.

What is the further fate of the draft bill? Is there any use to raise
this question in Ukraine? ForUm has asked experts and politicians to
clarify the situation.

Ostap Stupka, national artist of Ukraine:

- This drat bill should not even be in the parliament. What has
Russian to do with all this? It is the language of Russia, but we must
have only one state language, and it is Ukrainian.

Volodymyr Viatrovych, candidate of historical sciences, former
director of SBU archives:

- The issue on language policy is not urgent for today. It is being
artificially provoked and overswollen. Adoption of this draft bill
will hurt both the voters and MPs. It will result in disappearance of
the whole segment of Ukrainian business and large expenses from the
state budget. This is an ordinary political technology of the Party of
Regions, which is fighting for voters' attention.

Mustafa Jemiliov, MP from Our Ukraine faction, head of Crimean Tatar Majlis:

- The draft bill on state language policy is vicious. Taking into
account the fact that MPs vote by order, there is a chance that the
draft bill will be adopted. As a result, Ukraine will be directed into
Ukrainian and Russian speaking regions, while thirteen regions of
Ukraine will have Russian as a state language. We know that during
Soviet times Ukrainians lost their language. If Russian becomes the
second state language, the citizens will have no motivation to study
Ukrainian. The same concerns the Crimean Tatars.

We want our children to speak Ukrainian, but if Russian, which we
speak as freely as our native language, becomes official, there will
be no motivation to continue studying Ukrainian. This draft bill is
unacceptable - not now not in the future. In fact, the adoption of
this draft bill will establish criminal policy, carried out by Soviet
authorities.

Vadym Kolesnichenko, MP from the Party of Regions, the author of the draft bill:

- Isn't it the right time to provide Ukraine's citizens with their
rights? Lytyvn's desire to promote himself before the elections in
Zhytomyr is his problem. The draft bill was not considered because
Lytyvn violated the regulations and provoked a fight. He announced
simultaneous consideration of mutually exclusive draft bills and
purposely aggravated the situation. He is personally responsible for
the fight in the parliament.

The position of the majority remains unchanged - the draft bill must be adopted.

My colleagues from western Ukraine worry about their families, because
they receive physical intimidations for voting the draft bill.

In addition, all sociologists confirm that 45% of the population
stands for Russian language as the second state language, while other
45% stands against. So, those who want Ukrainian as the state language
are provided with their rights, while those who consider Russian as
their native language are not. The problem is not in the language, but
in the attitude. Limitation of human rights is unacceptable in a
democratic state of 21st century.

Volodymyr Paniotto, director of Kyiv international institute of sociology:

- Being a sociologist I cannot tell you whether this draft bill will
be adopted or not. I believe the very MPs do not know for sure. But I
know why this issue has been included into agenda.

I want to remind that the pre-election program of the Party of Regions
included the Russian language and its status in Ukraine. And the next
elections are coming...It's not important whether the draft bill is
adopted or not. The important is to demonstrate efforts: we wanted to
do this...

I support the opinion on that the language issue, historical events
and other sensitive for Ukrainians issues require discussions and
scientific approach. I am sure we must introduce a moratorium on use
of such issues in a political fight.

http://en.for-ua.com/interview/2012/05/28/162824.html

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
 A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list