[lg policy] Malaysia: Language flip-flops took toll on students and country, report suggests

Wed Dec 11 16:05:13 UTC 2013

Language flip-flops took toll on students and country, report suggests

December 11, 2013

 [image: This picture taken on September 22, 2011 shows students waiting at
their long house for transport to school in Sungai Asap, Sarawak. —
AFP pic]This
picture taken on September 22, 2011 shows students waiting at their long
house for transport to school in Sungai Asap, Sarawak. — AFP picKUALA
LUMPUR, Dec 11 — Repeated tinkering with the medium of instruction in
schools may have hurt both the performance of Malaysian students and race
relations in the country, according to a report by the World Bank.

While the switch from English to Bahasa Malaysia in schools 1970 had only a
marginally positive effect that was limited to Malay students, it came at
the price of racial polarisation and a continued decline in the command of
English in the country, it said as part of its “Malaysia Economic Monitor:
High Performing Education” report.

“The 1970 change in the medium of instruction from English to Bahasa
Malaysia may have improved educational and labour market outcomes for
ethnic Malays,” it said in the report.

The policy, it noted, increased the likelihood of students from the
community completing education to both secondary and tertiary levels, which
in turn raised their wage levels by 5.7 per cent.

“The impact for the other ethnic groups was minimal.”

The switch was largely credited to the Razak Report authored by the
country’s second prime minister, Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, which had
proposed for a more Malaysian-centric national school system.

The World Bank report is also surmised that this change was responsible for
the lower number of English-proficient teachers now available, as those
born after 1963 would not have benefitted from added exposure to the
language in national schools.

“Proficiency in the English language among English-language teachers is
very low, and it is particularly low among English-language teachers at
primary schools.

“Overall, a mere 25 per cent of these English teachers in primary school
were actually proficient in the language, and hence did not need any
further training to improve their skills in the English language. At the
secondary level, this fraction rose to 51 per cent of teachers,” the
reported said.

But another outcome of the Razak Report was the formalisation of the
“national” schools that taught in the Malay language, and “national-type”
schools that conducted vernacular education.

The report theorised that this policy may be responsible for the “greater
ethnic stratification” experience by the country.

Culled from an external study, a chart in the World Bank report asserted
that racial composition in English-medium schools prior to the 1970
change-over was more diverse than it is today, with an attendance that was
43.1 per cent Chinese, 34.6 per cent Malay, 16.4 per cent Indian, and with
the remaining 5.9 per cent coming from other ethnicities.

“With respect to ethnic diversity, Yong (2013) argues that the change in
language of instruction has contributed to the limited diversity in today’s
primary schools,” it said, but acknowledged that the composition was not
reflective of the country’s overall race profile then.

Controversially, the report also suggested that the Policy of Teaching
Science and Mathematics in English (PPSMI), which had been introduced in
2003 and discontinued seven years later, was contributory to Malaysia’s
decline in at least one international education benchmark.

The World Bank noted that Malaysia’s learning outcomes in the Trends in
International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) were above the
international average between 1999 and 2003, but declined sharply in
2007and further in 2011, coinciding with the policy.

“As implemented, the 2003 change in language of instruction from Bahasa
Malaysia to English for Science and Mathematics may have contributed to the
decline in learning outcomes as measured in the TIMSS,” read the report.

“Although overall performance may have deteriorated for a number of
reasons, a comparison with similar countries suggests that the policy may
have played a role.”

English-language lobbyist such as the Parents Action Group for Education
(PAGE) continue to push for the return of— or at least the option for
parents to choose — the discontinued policy that they contend was needed to
improve the mastery of English as well as technical subjects.

The Education Ministry recently made it mandatory for students sitting for
the SPM to pass the English language examination beginning 2016.

The World Bank in its report also appeared to caution against further
changes to the language policy in schools.

“[Given] that the Government has already made a policy decision in 2012 to
revert to teaching Science and Mathematics in Bahasa Malaysia, it would
likely be most productive to concentrate efforts on improving the quality
of teaching English as a second language.”
- See more at:
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/language-flip-flops-took-toll-on-students-and-country-report-suggests#sthash.KG62SBNr.dpuf

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20131211/909893b2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list