[lg policy] Edling Digest, Vol 7, Issue 13
Harold Schiffman
hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Fri Feb 8 16:09:37 UTC 2013
Forwarded From: edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Political Economy of Culture: Where Should President
Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent language policy or on
Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the Path
of U.S.
Citizenship? (Christian Faltis)
2. Clinical Assistant Professor of TESOL (two positions),
University of Maryland (Jeff MacSwan)
3. Re: Political Economy of Culture: Where Should President
Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent language policy or on
Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the Path of U.S.
Citizenship? (kaboyates at charter.net)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:41:33 -0800
From: Christian Faltis <christian.faltis at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Edling] Political Economy of Culture: Where Should
President Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent
language policy or on
Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the Path
of U.S.
Citizenship?
To: The Educational Linguistics List <edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
Cc: The Educational Linguistics List <edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
Message-ID: <A3D2F4D5-A5D8-4319-9BEB-FF1727793EC1 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
I have to agree completely with Tom on this. Once you start with the
proposition that minority group doesn't want to learn the national
language, the assumption is that a national language unifies, and
there is much debate about that. Studying the history of the treatment
of indigenous and other minoritized groups in the US will show that
that the dominant groups will promote policies and practices that
ensure their dominance. One strategy is to espouse the belief that
certain minoritized groups don't want do belong, hence placing the
blame on them.
Chris Faltis
Professor, language, literacy, and culture
University of California, Davis
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 6, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Thomas Ricento <tricento at ucalgary.ca> wrote:
> HI MYRNA,
>
> Here are your exact words in your e mail:
>
> "Fact is, historically, Hispanics are the only ethnic group
> immigrating to the U.S. that has resisted learning English. I'm not
> sure why this is so, but it might be a good basis for some research if
> it has not already been done or if it is not already in the works."
>
> Your statement is categorical, whatever your intentions might have been, and it is contradicted by evidence (if that matters).
>
> There is a TON of research on this topic; there ARE government programs providing ESL classes for immigrants in the US (but not nearly enough); this IS a political history with a deep and contentious history in the US, which I and many others have spent many years studying and writing about. If you are interested in learning more, then there is a wealth of literature to read. My comment about Huntington and anti-immigrant zealots was not directed to you personally; rather, it was describing a political reality in the U.S. If you look at the latest poll numbers on how Obama is graded on his position re. a path for citizenship for undocumented Americans (mostly Latinos), Republican (white) conservative males are the only group strongly opposed to his position on immigration reform.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se [edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se] On Behalf Of Myrna Goldstein [myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 8:18 AM
> To: The Educational Linguistics List
> Subject: Re: [Edling] Political Economy of Culture: Where Should President Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent language policy or on Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the Path of U.S. Citizenship?
>
> HI TOM,
>
> You quoted me wrong.
> And distorted what I wrote creating a fictitious context.
>
> I believe that stereotyping is so very negative and have
> never done so in my life.
>
>
> Myrna
>
>
>
> Myrna Goldstein, B.S.J., MATESL
> Founder, Director
> Are You in Your English File??
> Second Language Learning Research Center
> Eilat, Israel (formerly Milan, Italy)
>
> Member:
> TESOL
> Linguistic Society of America
> American Association for Applied Linguistics
>
> e: myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com
> Skype: myinmi
> c: ++972 053 525 5360
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Thomas Ricento wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is a brief snipet from a chapter I wrote to appear in R.
> Bayley, et al. (editors), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics
> (2013, p. 540):
>
> "Rumbaut, et al. (2006: 458), relying on data from two published
> studies and a
> survey they conducted themselves in Southern California during 2001?
> 2004,
> conclude that ?under current conditions . . . the ability to speak
> Spanish very
> well can be expected to disappear sometime between the second and third
> generation for all Latin American groups in Southern California.? They
> also
> found that ?the average Asian language can be expected to die out at
> or near
> the second generation? (ibid). To account for such a wide discrepancy
> between
> the apparent facts and widely held misperceptions, it is necessary to
> consider
> the influence, and effects, of deeply held beliefs about language and
> identity
> that are resistant to contrary evidence".
>
> It is amazing that someone who has expertise in English language
> teaching also succumbs to the stereotype that 'Latinos refuse to learn
> English'. This
> has been the battle cry of Huntington and others (mostly right wing,
> anti-immigrant advocates) who categorize Latinos as refuseniks. It's
> just not true. Maintaining Spanish (an American Language) alongside
> English should be viewed as a positive outcome, even though, as
> Rumbaut and his colleagues demonstrate, Spanish is being lost. If
> 'experts' make such claims as Myrna does, it shows that we as applied
> linguists have a long way to go to educate the broader public.
>
> Tom Ricento
> Professor and Chair, English as an Additional Language
> Faculty of Education
> University of Calgary
> ________________________________________
> From: edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se [edling-
> bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se] On Behalf Of Myrna Goldstein [myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com
> ]
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 3:21 AM
> To: The Educational Linguistics List
> Subject: Re: [Edling] Political Economy of Culture: Where Should
> President Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent language policy
> or on Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the Path
> of U.S. Citizenship?
>
> Dear David,
>
> I read your piece with interest, trying to understand the
> rationale behind it, beyond the numbers of the Hispanic
> population. Fact is, historically, Hispanics are the only ethnic group
> immigrating to the U.S. that has resisted learning English. I'm not
> sure why this is so, but it might be a good basis for some research if
> it has not already been done or if it is not already in the works.
>
> I'm not judging. I'm curious. In order to get decent jobs, immigrants
> to any country in the world realize that they must learn the L1. If they
> don't, they will always remain in low-level jobs, be isolated from
> society
> at large, and will not be able to study at universities to let their
> talents bloom.
>
> I'm not sure that legislation is the answer; this would have to be
> studied.
> But common sense is. So rather than compelling people from above
> (government)
> to learn English, it would seem more logical that people themselves
> would
> want to learn the nation's common language if those people have a
> vision of a
> better life that they feel they can achieve. I believe this has always
> been the
> basis of every group's immigration everywhere in the world.
>
> Perhaps after the U.S. gets its fiscal house in order, it could finance
> an immigration program that includes ESL courses, thus giving people
> the option
> to attend or not to attend. That way, people who do not want to learn
> the nation's
> L1 would not be compelled to, but people who do, would have free
> lessons, say,
> to get themselves to a B1 (intermediate) level (Common European
> Frameworks). People
> who would like to get to an advanced level could do so either through
> self-study or
> through community language programs.
>
> Let us not forget that non-native speakers must take various
> standardized tests to
> be admitted to many universities and colleges. I'm not sure if
> community colleges
> require TOEFL, GMAT, SAT etc. So, the fact remains, David, that
> English is the nation's
> L1 and the future of every immigrant who wants to better his life and
> the life of his
> children resides in learning that L1.
>
> Linguistically yours,
>
> Myrna
>
>
> Myrna Goldstein, B.S.J., MATESL
> Founder, Director
> Are You in Your English File??
> Second Language Learning Research Center
> Eilat, Israel (formerly Milan, Italy)
>
> Member:
> TESOL
> Linguistic Society of America
> American Association for Applied Linguistics
>
> e: myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com<mailto:myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com>
> Skype: myinmi
> c: ++972 053 525 5360
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:35 AM, David Balosa wrote:
>
>
> Political Economy of Culture: Where Should President Obama Start: By
> Designing a Consistent National Language Policy or by Requiring
> illegal Immigrant to Learn English as a Path to the United States
> Citizenship?
> By
> David Balosa
> University of Maryland
> Baltimore County, (UMBC)
>
>
> Spanish is currently spoken as a first language by
> approximately twenty-two million people
> in the United States. The Hispanics are currently America's
> fastest growing ethnic
> community and their numbers are set to rise to 96.5 million
> by 2050. This is not without
> problems as the United States does not have legislation which
> states that English is the
> official language of the Union; it has always relied on the
> desire of immigrants for social
> assimilation and mobility to consolidate the pre-eminence of
> English.
> (Miranda
> Stewart, 1999: 6-7)
>
> In his address regarding "Fixing broken immigration system" entitled
> "Vision for winning the future" President Obama mentioned four key
> points which he calls accountabilities and responsibilities: 1.
> Responsibility by the federal government to secure our borders, 2.
> Accountability for businesses that break the law by undermining
> American workers and exploiting undocumented workers,
> 3. Strengthening our economic competitiveness by creating a legal
> immigration system that reflects our values and diverse needs, and 4.
> Responsibility from people who are living in the United States
> illegally. My question for discussion and my reflection will focus on
> the president's point number 4. I think that the President plays too
> much politics here and that he is undermining the scholarship on the
> everlasting debate on language policy in the United States. Fixing
> broken immigration system is one thing, but requiring illegal
> immigrants to learn English as one of the requirements is tantamount
> to English-Only America movement. Until there is a coherent language
> policy, by coherent I mean agreed upon by the United States citizens,
> a unidirectional language requirement by federal officials, especially
> the president of the United States is getting out of the house through
> the back door. I am not saying that illegal immigrant should not learn
> English or Spanish, the point is that so far there is no legal basis
> to require any one to learn English for what so ever in the United
> States. If the President is going to initiative a path to language
> policy weather English or English and Spanish as official languages,
> then the United States will make a big step forward in solving big
> issues regarding intercultural relations. To clear understand my
> point, let's analyze the president approach to learning English as a
> requirement to illegal immigrant path to the United States Citizenship.
>
> One of the key requirements that the represent mentioned that
> illegal immigrants living in U.S. must fulfill to the path of U.S.
> citizenship is learning English. The president's statement reads: "
> Those people living here illegally must also be held accountable for
> their actions and get on the right side of the law by registering and
> undergoing national security and criminal background checks, paying
> taxes and a penalty, and learning English before they can get in line
> to become eligible for citizenship. Being a citizen of this country
> comes not only with rights but also with fundamental responsibilities.
> We can create a pathway for legal status that is fair and reflects our
> values." Wait a minute! Is Mr. President here trying to have his cake
> and eat it too? Since the president favorite sentence in this
> immigration debate is "We are a nation of law and a nation of
> immigrants", is the president telling us that English is going to
> become the fundamental language of American values? How about the 55
> millions U.S. Spanish -speakers? Do their language and culture also
> contribute to the American Values? Should U.S. citizens working for
> Univisions, Telemondo, UNI-MAS, etc. who may also contribute to the
> economic competitiveness of U.S. be required to learn English for U.S.
> citizenship? According to Stewart (1999:6-7), "The Hispanics are
> currently America's fastest growing ethnic community and their numbers
> are set to rise to 96.5 million by 2050 (quoting, The Guardian,
> 16.07.98)." Stewart observes that "This is not without problems as the
> United States does not have legislation which states that English is
> the official language of the Union; it has always relied on the desire
> of immigrants for social assimilation and mobility to consolidate the
> pre-eminence of English."
> During the 2008 Democratic presidential election primary debate,
> President Obama, Senator Obama at that time articulated, when he was
> asked by a CNN journalist weather English should be the Official
> language of the United States that, "We should not focus on issue that
> divide us, instead we should focus on how to fix our broken
> immigration system." It has been the politics of escape goat forever
> when it comes to regulating language policy in fair and realistic way
> in the U.S. President Obama, after winning 75 % of Latino votes
> without questioning weather they spoke English or not at the time they
> went voting now is suggesting learning English as a requirement for
> legal immigration status. If learning a language was an easy task,
> most college graduates U.S. would be speaking Spanish fluently. Since
> President Obama likes to look at fair game plays, would not t be a
> fair game to say all illegal immigrants must learn both English and
> Spanish as a requirement to citizenship?
> One may infers that requiring learning English alone is a support
> to English -Only movement. This approach undermines the substantial
> contribution of Hispanic culture to the values of the United States.
> The "Latinazization" (Benitez, 2007) of illigal immigrants may also be
> a valuable inference if we don't require illegal immigrant to learn
> Spanish as well. Will various English dialect speakers be required to
> learn American Standard English if that what Mr. President meant? The
> "World Englishes" (Mesthrie & Bhatt, 2008) as well as the world
> Spanishes (Stewart, 1999; Lorenzo-Dus, 2011) can only be used as
> requirement for national immigration legal status after they have been
> adopted as Official language of the nation. Otherwise they should not
> be mentioned in the fixing broken immigration system.
>
> In Conclusion, It is not only the immigration system that is
> broken, it is the entire public policy system that is broken. If Mr.
> President wants to start fixing this broken system of public policy
> the workable strategy would be looking at the policy of that public or
> social sector setting, fix it, that is, make it if it is a
> commonsensical argument and truly reflective of U.S. values, a law of
> the nation. Since thee is no federal law regulating languages in U.S.,
> it would illegal to require a given language learning as a
> requirement to U.S. citizenship. Requiring learning English will sound
> like a cultural hegemonic strategy and it will not reflect what the
> president calls "A smart 21st century" - a century of people and
> communities cohesion by consensus, that is people decide their
> intercultural democratic rules of governance not bias policy makers.
> Either English alone or English and Spanish as co-official languages
> for the United States- why not create a referendum on this issue and
> stick to what the U.S. diverse population decide. It will make more
> sense after people will look at these two global languages - both
> spoken by significant numbers of legal U.S. citizens in the ballot and
> let the people decide. It is only after that referendum that all
> cultural groups will live with the decision weather they like it or
> not. Because it will become the law of the land. Leaving the issue on
> the policy makers whose bias attitude and cultural hegemony have been
> demonstrated through centuries will never lead the U.S. to the Smart
> 21st century language policy. Should not a true vision for the future
> of the United States plan also for a language which the numbers of its
> speakers will reach 96.5 million in 2050? Should the U.S. language
> policymakers understand that a language policy that reflects the
> cultural reality of the country makes the country more prosperous
> economically and culturally? May be the example of Luxembourg, South
> Africa, Paraguay, and Switzerland will inspire us as we plan for a
> "smart 21st century". What do you think?
>
>
> References
>
> Benitez, C. (2007). Latinization: How Latino culture is transforming
> the U.S. New York: Paramount
> Market Publishing.
> Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights: In theory and practice
> (2nd. ed.). New York: Cornell
> University Press.
> Lorenzo-Dus, N. (ed.) (2011). Spanish at work: Analyzing institutional
> discourse across the Spanish-
> speaking world. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
> Mesthirie, R. & Bhatt, R. M. (2008). World Englishes: The study of new
> linguistic varieties. New York:
> Cambridge University Press.
> Stewart, M. (1999). The Spanish language today. New York: Routledge.
>
> www.whitehouse.gov/issues/fixing-immigration-system-america-s-21st-century-Economy
> <http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/fixing-immigration-system-america-s-21st-century-Economy
>
> --
> *David M. Balosa*
> *Doctoral Student, PhD Program in Language, Literacy and Culture (LLC)*
> Research Focus: Intercultural Communication & Cultural Exchange
> Interculturalists GSO President 2012-2013
> *University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
> **1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Edling mailing list
> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
>
> _______________________________________________
> Edling mailing list
> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
>
> _______________________________________________
> Edling mailing list
> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
> _______________________________________________
> Edling mailing list
> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 14:00:19 +0000
From: Jeff MacSwan <macswan at umd.edu>
Subject: [Edling] Clinical Assistant Professor of TESOL (two
positions), University of Maryland
To: The Educational Linguistics List <edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
Message-ID:
<352E4DFB68990544933B6804B47DEDDC12C49B at OITMX1007.AD.UMD.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Apologies for any cross-postings. Please help spread the word.
------------------------
The Department of Teaching and Learning, Policy and Leadership (TLPL)
in the College of Education at the University of Maryland seeks to
hire two Clinical Assistant Professors of TESOL. Both positions
require a doctorate in language education, applied linguistics, or
closely related field, and both involve significant coordination and
oversight responsibilities.
Position #1: Clinical Assistant Professor of TESOL (1)
Clinical Assistant Professor of TESOL and PDS Coordinator (Position
#1). The TESOL Program/PDS Coordinator works collaboratively with
other faculty in the Division of Language, Literacy, Culture, and
Social Inquiry (LLCSI) to coordinate the day-to-day activities of
three TESOL masters programs and an undergraduate TESOL minor, both
on-campus and in Professional Development School (PDS) sites. The
TESOL Program/PDS Coordinator assists in recruitment and program
improvement initiatives, completes TESOL-NCATE reports, communicates
regularly with students about upcoming deadlines and opportunities,
collaborates with program partners, and performs other related duties.
Teaching responsibilities include two 3-credit courses each year, a
1-credit internship seminar each semester, and supervision of two
interns for fall or spring semester. This is a 9-month, non-tenure
accruing academic appointment with limited, separately compensated
summer commitments.
Minimum Qualifications (Position #1): K-12 classroom teaching
experience; PhD or EdD in TESOL, language education, or related field;
experience working collaboratively with local schools; evidence of
capacity to manage program details effectively.
Desired Qualifications (Position #1): Experience teaching in a
teacher education program at the Masters level.
Position #2: Clinical Assistant Professor of TESOL (2)
Clinical Assistant Professor of TESOL and TESOL Outreach Program
Coordinator (Position #2). A new position, the TESOL Outreach Program
Coordinator plans and implements short-term TESOL institutes for
groups of international visitors in collaboration with the Center for
Language, Literacy and Culture (CLLC) in the Department of Teaching
and Learning, Policy and Leadership (TLPL) and in partnership with the
Maryland English Institute (MEI), and plans, staffs, and implements a
planned online TESOL Masters program. The TESOL Outreach Program
Coordinator is responsible for building the outreach efforts of the
CLLC and TLPL. Teaching responsibilities are balanced with program
coordination responsibilities. This is a 12-month, non-tenure accruing
academic appointment.
Minimum Qualifications (Position #2): PhD or EdD in TESOL, language
education, or related field; evidence of capacity to manage program
details effectively.
Desired Qualifications (Position #2): Proficiency in a language other
than English; international experience; experience with online
teaching.
How To Apply
For best consideration, please submit all materials by February 22, 2013.
Applicants may apply for either or both positions, as appropriate. To
be considered for both positions, applicants must separately submit
their materials for each. Applications for either position should
include a cover letter, curriculum vitae, and the names and email
addresses of three individuals who can provide letters of
recommendation. The cover letter should relate the applicant's
qualifications to the set of responsibilities for the position, and
should describe the applicant's intellectual interests in the field,
and how these might fit within a community of scholars in TESOL and
Applied Linguistics.
To apply for Position #1 (job posting # 118845), visit this link:
https://jobs.umd.edu/applicants/Central?quickFind=58364
To apply for Position #2 (job posting # 118872), visit this link:
https://jobs.umd.edu/applicants/Central?quickFind=58411
For inquiries, please contact Jeff MacSwan, search committee chair, at
macswan at umd.edu.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 14:05:06 -0500 (EST)
From: kaboyates at charter.net
Subject: Re: [Edling] Political Economy of Culture: Where Should
President Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent language policy or on
Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the Path of U.S.
Citizenship?
To: The Educational Linguistics List <edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
Message-ID: <192837e5.434b17.13cb60c0630.Webtop.47 at charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=no
Colleagues,
If you reflect on American history, Christian Faltis's point that "a
national language unifies" is a debatable point is clearly supported.
Of course, English did not prevent the Civil War. And, at the time of
the greatest crisis in American history, entire regiments, brigades,
divisions, and almost an entire corps spoke another language: German.
They did not fight to PRESERVE the Union because English was unifying
factor.
In Missouri, the German speakers were crucial in keeping it in the
Union. After the Civil War, besides cities like Milwaukee and
Cincinnati (and at times St. Louis), there were communities in rural
parts of Ohio, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Missouri (and I'm sure other
states in the Midwest) that had public bilingual schools. (I have
visited cemeteries in rural Missouri around Lutheran and Catholic
Churches where almost all the headstones from the 1870s to the early
1920s are all in German.) I don't think those people were consider
unAmerican until the outbreak of WW I. Of course, when the US entered
the Great War, that bilingualism ended almost overnight.
There are some areas where I live in Missouri that try to celebrate
their bilingual past. There is a theater that puts on plays in a dialect
of German and a community that has people tell stories in German about
what it was like in that community during the Civil War. Hermann,
Missouri is a tourist destination that celebrates its German past some
of the people will talk about the historic buildings in German.
I often wonder if the ending of German-English bilingualism had not
happened and there were still some areas in the Midwest (beside some
small Amish and Mennonite communities) that still had bilingual programs
would we be so concerned about Spanish-bilingualism today.
Bob Yates, University of Central Missouri
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Christian Faltis wrote:
> I have to agree completely with Tom on this. Once you start with the
> proposition that minority group doesn't want to learn the national
> language, the assumption is that a national language unifies, and
> there is much debate about that. Studying the history of the treatment
> of indigenous and other minoritized groups in the US will show that
> that the dominant groups will promote policies and practices that
> ensure their dominance. One strategy is to espouse the belief that
> certain minoritized groups don't want do belong, hence placing the
> blame on them.
>
>
> Chris Faltis
> Professor, language, literacy, and culture
> University of California, Davis
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Thomas Ricento <tricento at ucalgary.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> HI MYRNA,
>>
>> Here are your exact words in your e mail:
>>
>> "Fact is, historically, Hispanics are the only ethnic group
>> immigrating to the U.S. that has resisted learning English. I'm not
>> sure why this is so, but it might be a good basis for some research
>> if
>> it has not already been done or if it is not already in the works."
>>
>> Your statement is categorical, whatever your intentions might have
>> been, and it is contradicted by evidence (if that matters).
>>
>> There is a TON of research on this topic; there ARE government
>> programs providing ESL classes for immigrants in the US (but not
>> nearly enough); this IS a political history with a deep and
>> contentious history in the US, which I and many others have spent
>> many years studying and writing about. If you are interested in
>> learning more, then there is a wealth of literature to read. My
>> comment about Huntington and anti-immigrant zealots was not directed
>> to you personally; rather, it was describing a political reality in
>> the U.S. If you look at the latest poll numbers on how Obama is
>> graded on his position re. a path for citizenship for undocumented
>> Americans (mostly Latinos), Republican (white) conservative males are
>> the only group strongly opposed to his position on immigration
>> reform.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se
>> [edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se] On Behalf Of Myrna Goldstein
>> [myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 8:18 AM
>> To: The Educational Linguistics List
>> Subject: Re: [Edling] Political Economy of Culture: Where Should
>> President Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent language
>> policy or on Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the
>> Path of U.S. Citizenship?
>>
>> HI TOM,
>>
>> You quoted me wrong.
>> And distorted what I wrote creating a fictitious context.
>>
>> I believe that stereotyping is so very negative and have
>> never done so in my life.
>>
>>
>> Myrna
>>
>>
>>
>> Myrna Goldstein, B.S.J., MATESL
>> Founder, Director
>> Are You in Your English File??
>> Second Language Learning Research Center
>> Eilat, Israel (formerly Milan, Italy)
>>
>> Member:
>> TESOL
>> Linguistic Society of America
>> American Association for Applied Linguistics
>>
>> e: myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com
>> Skype: myinmi
>> c: ++972 053 525 5360
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Thomas Ricento wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is a brief snipet from a chapter I wrote to appear in R.
>> Bayley, et al. (editors), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics
>> (2013, p. 540):
>>
>> "Rumbaut, et al. (2006: 458), relying on data from two published
>> studies and a
>> survey they conducted themselves in Southern California during 2001?
>> 2004,
>> conclude that ?under current conditions . . . the ability to speak
>> Spanish very
>> well can be expected to disappear sometime between the second and
>> third
>> generation for all Latin American groups in Southern California.?
>> They
>> also
>> found that ?the average Asian language can be expected to die out at
>> or near
>> the second generation? (ibid). To account for such a wide discrepancy
>> between
>> the apparent facts and widely held misperceptions, it is necessary to
>> consider
>> the influence, and effects, of deeply held beliefs about language and
>> identity
>> that are resistant to contrary evidence".
>>
>> It is amazing that someone who has expertise in English language
>> teaching also succumbs to the stereotype that 'Latinos refuse to
>> learn
>> English'. This
>> has been the battle cry of Huntington and others (mostly right wing,
>> anti-immigrant advocates) who categorize Latinos as refuseniks. It's
>> just not true. Maintaining Spanish (an American Language) alongside
>> English should be viewed as a positive outcome, even though, as
>> Rumbaut and his colleagues demonstrate, Spanish is being lost. If
>> 'experts' make such claims as Myrna does, it shows that we as applied
>> linguists have a long way to go to educate the broader public.
>>
>> Tom Ricento
>> Professor and Chair, English as an Additional Language
>> Faculty of Education
>> University of Calgary
>> ________________________________________
>> From: edling-bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se [edling-
>> bounces at bunner.geol.lu.se] On Behalf Of Myrna Goldstein
>> [myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com
>> ]
>> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 3:21 AM
>> To: The Educational Linguistics List
>> Subject: Re: [Edling] Political Economy of Culture: Where Should
>> President Obama Start: By Designing a Consistent language policy
>> or on Imposing English Language as a Requirement to the Path
>> of U.S. Citizenship?
>>
>> Dear David,
>>
>> I read your piece with interest, trying to understand the
>> rationale behind it, beyond the numbers of the Hispanic
>> population. Fact is, historically, Hispanics are the only ethnic
>> group
>> immigrating to the U.S. that has resisted learning English. I'm not
>> sure why this is so, but it might be a good basis for some research
>> if
>> it has not already been done or if it is not already in the works.
>>
>> I'm not judging. I'm curious. In order to get decent jobs, immigrants
>> to any country in the world realize that they must learn the L1. If
>> they
>> don't, they will always remain in low-level jobs, be isolated from
>> society
>> at large, and will not be able to study at universities to let their
>> talents bloom.
>>
>> I'm not sure that legislation is the answer; this would have to be
>> studied.
>> But common sense is. So rather than compelling people from above
>> (government)
>> to learn English, it would seem more logical that people themselves
>> would
>> want to learn the nation's common language if those people have a
>> vision of a
>> better life that they feel they can achieve. I believe this has
>> always
>> been the
>> basis of every group's immigration everywhere in the world.
>>
>> Perhaps after the U.S. gets its fiscal house in order, it could
>> finance
>> an immigration program that includes ESL courses, thus giving people
>> the option
>> to attend or not to attend. That way, people who do not want to learn
>> the nation's
>> L1 would not be compelled to, but people who do, would have free
>> lessons, say,
>> to get themselves to a B1 (intermediate) level (Common European
>> Frameworks). People
>> who would like to get to an advanced level could do so either through
>> self-study or
>> through community language programs.
>>
>> Let us not forget that non-native speakers must take various
>> standardized tests to
>> be admitted to many universities and colleges. I'm not sure if
>> community colleges
>> require TOEFL, GMAT, SAT etc. So, the fact remains, David, that
>> English is the nation's
>> L1 and the future of every immigrant who wants to better his life and
>> the life of his
>> children resides in learning that L1.
>>
>> Linguistically yours,
>>
>> Myrna
>>
>>
>> Myrna Goldstein, B.S.J., MATESL
>> Founder, Director
>> Are You in Your English File??
>> Second Language Learning Research Center
>> Eilat, Israel (formerly Milan, Italy)
>>
>> Member:
>> TESOL
>> Linguistic Society of America
>> American Association for Applied Linguistics
>>
>> e: myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com<mailto:myrnaenglishfile at gmail.com>
>> Skype: myinmi
>> c: ++972 053 525 5360
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:35 AM, David Balosa wrote:
>>
>>
>> Political Economy of Culture: Where Should President Obama Start: By
>> Designing a Consistent National Language Policy or by Requiring
>> illegal Immigrant to Learn English as a Path to the United States
>> Citizenship?
>> By
>> David Balosa
>> University of Maryland
>> Baltimore County, (UMBC)
>>
>>
>> Spanish is currently spoken as a first language by
>> approximately twenty-two million people
>> in the United States. The Hispanics are currently America's
>> fastest growing ethnic
>> community and their numbers are set to rise to 96.5 million
>> by 2050. This is not without
>> problems as the United States does not have legislation which
>> states that English is the
>> official language of the Union; it has always relied on the
>> desire of immigrants for social
>> assimilation and mobility to consolidate the pre-eminence of
>> English.
>>
>> (Miranda
>> Stewart, 1999: 6-7)
>>
>> In his address regarding "Fixing broken immigration system" entitled
>> "Vision for winning the future" President Obama mentioned four key
>> points which he calls accountabilities and responsibilities: 1.
>> Responsibility by the federal government to secure our borders, 2.
>> Accountability for businesses that break the law by undermining
>> American workers and exploiting undocumented workers,
>> 3. Strengthening our economic competitiveness by creating a legal
>> immigration system that reflects our values and diverse needs, and 4.
>> Responsibility from people who are living in the United States
>> illegally. My question for discussion and my reflection will focus
>> on
>> the president's point number 4. I think that the President plays too
>> much politics here and that he is undermining the scholarship on the
>> everlasting debate on language policy in the United States. Fixing
>> broken immigration system is one thing, but requiring illegal
>> immigrants to learn English as one of the requirements is tantamount
>> to English-Only America movement. Until there is a coherent language
>> policy, by coherent I mean agreed upon by the United States citizens,
>> a unidirectional language requirement by federal officials,
>> especially
>> the president of the United States is getting out of the house
>> through
>> the back door. I am not saying that illegal immigrant should not
>> learn
>> English or Spanish, the point is that so far there is no legal basis
>> to require any one to learn English for what so ever in the United
>> States. If the President is going to initiative a path to language
>> policy weather English or English and Spanish as official languages,
>> then the United States will make a big step forward in solving big
>> issues regarding intercultural relations. To clear understand my
>> point, let's analyze the president approach to learning English as a
>> requirement to illegal immigrant path to the United States
>> Citizenship.
>>
>> One of the key requirements that the represent mentioned that
>> illegal immigrants living in U.S. must fulfill to the path of U.S.
>> citizenship is learning English. The president's statement reads: "
>> Those people living here illegally must also be held accountable for
>> their actions and get on the right side of the law by registering and
>> undergoing national security and criminal background checks, paying
>> taxes and a penalty, and learning English before they can get in line
>> to become eligible for citizenship. Being a citizen of this country
>> comes not only with rights but also with fundamental
>> responsibilities.
>> We can create a pathway for legal status that is fair and reflects
>> our
>> values." Wait a minute! Is Mr. President here trying to have his cake
>> and eat it too? Since the president favorite sentence in this
>> immigration debate is "We are a nation of law and a nation of
>> immigrants", is the president telling us that English is going to
>> become the fundamental language of American values? How about the 55
>> millions U.S. Spanish -speakers? Do their language and culture also
>> contribute to the American Values? Should U.S. citizens working for
>> Univisions, Telemondo, UNI-MAS, etc. who may also contribute to the
>> economic competitiveness of U.S. be required to learn English for
>> U.S.
>> citizenship? According to Stewart (1999:6-7), "The Hispanics are
>> currently America's fastest growing ethnic community and their
>> numbers
>> are set to rise to 96.5 million by 2050 (quoting, The Guardian,
>> 16.07.98)." Stewart observes that "This is not without problems as
>> the
>> United States does not have legislation which states that English is
>> the official language of the Union; it has always relied on the
>> desire
>> of immigrants for social assimilation and mobility to consolidate the
>> pre-eminence of English."
>> During the 2008 Democratic presidential election primary debate,
>> President Obama, Senator Obama at that time articulated, when he was
>> asked by a CNN journalist weather English should be the Official
>> language of the United States that, "We should not focus on issue
>> that
>> divide us, instead we should focus on how to fix our broken
>> immigration system." It has been the politics of escape goat forever
>> when it comes to regulating language policy in fair and realistic way
>> in the U.S. President Obama, after winning 75 % of Latino votes
>> without questioning weather they spoke English or not at the time
>> they
>> went voting now is suggesting learning English as a requirement for
>> legal immigration status. If learning a language was an easy task,
>> most college graduates U.S. would be speaking Spanish fluently. Since
>> President Obama likes to look at fair game plays, would not t be a
>> fair game to say all illegal immigrants must learn both English and
>> Spanish as a requirement to citizenship?
>> One may infers that requiring learning English alone is a support
>> to English -Only movement. This approach undermines the substantial
>> contribution of Hispanic culture to the values of the United States.
>> The "Latinazization" (Benitez, 2007) of illigal immigrants may also
>> be
>> a valuable inference if we don't require illegal immigrant to learn
>> Spanish as well. Will various English dialect speakers be required to
>> learn American Standard English if that what Mr. President meant? The
>> "World Englishes" (Mesthrie & Bhatt, 2008) as well as the world
>> Spanishes (Stewart, 1999; Lorenzo-Dus, 2011) can only be used as
>> requirement for national immigration legal status after they have
>> been
>> adopted as Official language of the nation. Otherwise they should not
>> be mentioned in the fixing broken immigration system.
>>
>> In Conclusion, It is not only the immigration system that is
>> broken, it is the entire public policy system that is broken. If Mr.
>> President wants to start fixing this broken system of public policy
>> the workable strategy would be looking at the policy of that public
>> or
>> social sector setting, fix it, that is, make it if it is a
>> commonsensical argument and truly reflective of U.S. values, a law of
>> the nation. Since thee is no federal law regulating languages in
>> U.S.,
>> it would illegal to require a given language learning as a
>> requirement to U.S. citizenship. Requiring learning English will
>> sound
>> like a cultural hegemonic strategy and it will not reflect what the
>> president calls "A smart 21st century" - a century of people and
>> communities cohesion by consensus, that is people decide their
>> intercultural democratic rules of governance not bias policy makers.
>> Either English alone or English and Spanish as co-official languages
>> for the United States- why not create a referendum on this issue and
>> stick to what the U.S. diverse population decide. It will make more
>> sense after people will look at these two global languages - both
>> spoken by significant numbers of legal U.S. citizens in the ballot
>> and
>> let the people decide. It is only after that referendum that all
>> cultural groups will live with the decision weather they like it or
>> not. Because it will become the law of the land. Leaving the issue on
>> the policy makers whose bias attitude and cultural hegemony have been
>> demonstrated through centuries will never lead the U.S. to the Smart
>> 21st century language policy. Should not a true vision for the future
>> of the United States plan also for a language which the numbers of
>> its
>> speakers will reach 96.5 million in 2050? Should the U.S. language
>> policymakers understand that a language policy that reflects the
>> cultural reality of the country makes the country more prosperous
>> economically and culturally? May be the example of Luxembourg, South
>> Africa, Paraguay, and Switzerland will inspire us as we plan for a
>> "smart 21st century". What do you think?
>>
>>
>> References
>>
>> Benitez, C. (2007). Latinization: How Latino culture is transforming
>> the U.S. New York: Paramount
>> Market Publishing.
>> Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights: In theory and practice
>> (2nd. ed.). New York: Cornell
>> University Press.
>> Lorenzo-Dus, N. (ed.) (2011). Spanish at work: Analyzing
>> institutional
>> discourse across the Spanish-
>> speaking world. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
>> Mesthirie, R. & Bhatt, R. M. (2008). World Englishes: The study of
>> new
>> linguistic varieties. New York:
>> Cambridge University Press.
>> Stewart, M. (1999). The Spanish language today. New York: Routledge.
>>
>>
>> www.whitehouse.gov/issues/fixing-immigration-system-america-s-21st-century-Economy
>>
>> <http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/fixing-immigration-system-america-s-21st-century-Economy
>>
>> --
>> *David M. Balosa*
>> *Doctoral Student, PhD Program in Language, Literacy and Culture
>> (LLC)*
>> Research Focus: Intercultural Communication & Cultural Exchange
>> Interculturalists GSO President 2012-2013
>> *University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
>> **1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250*
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Edling mailing list
>> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se<mailto:Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se>
>> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Edling mailing list
>> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Edling mailing list
>> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
>> _______________________________________________
>> Edling mailing list
>> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
>> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
> _______________________________________________
> Edling mailing list
> Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
> http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Edling mailing list
Edling at bunner.geol.lu.se
http://bunner.geol.lu.se/mailman/listinfo/edling
End of Edling Digest, Vol 7, Issue 13
*************************************
--
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal,
and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message.
A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman,
Moderator)
For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list
mailing list