[lg policy] Washington State: Official language policy needed

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at GMAIL.COM
Fri Aug 29 14:51:36 UTC 2014

Official language policy needed to unite Washington residents | GUEST

   - inShare0

   - Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00PM

 *By Mauro E. Mujica*
*For the Reporter *

When it comes to cultivating a welcoming environment for immigrants,
policymakers in Washington are lacking.

Yes, the Evergreen State is home to a diverse group of residents.
Washingtonians speak 167 different languages, according to the United
States Census Bureau, and nearly 60 languages are spoken by more than 1,000
residents. But as one of just 19 states without an official language
policy, Washington's immigrants are met with little assistance to help them

More than 8 percent of Washington residents are considered limited English
proficient, meaning they would struggle to carry on more than a basic
conversation in English.

Currently, in an effort to include these residents, the state offers
driver's license examinations in six languages other than English.
Countless state documents and services are offered in foreign languages for
the same reason. Unfortunately, as well intentioned as these translations
may seem, they are misguided when it comes to creating a unified
environment for all residents.

As an immigrant myself, I know that to succeed in the United States,
English proficiency is key. As someone who came to the United States before
the government provided the crutch of native language translations, I also
know that delaying English acquisition does immigrants no favors.

Without an official language policy, immigrants receive the message that
English is optional, not essential. Without English proficiency, immigrants
are often held back from better, higher paying jobs, health insurance and
more. They are likely to encounter language barriers on a daily basis at
the grocery store, the doctor's office or a child's school.

Conversely, if Washington's state government agencies offered services in
English, rather than an abundance of foreign languages, immigrants would
face an added incentive to learn English sooner. With the money saved on
translations, the state government could even designate funding to create
additional English language learning classes or invest in education,
infrastructure or other areas in need.

In other words, declaring English the official language of Washington is a
win-win situation for all parties involved. With an Official English
policy, residents are still free to speak the language of their choosing,
but will also benefit from an added incentive to learn English. That
English proficiency can lead to a 30 percent increase in income,
contributing to a better life for the immigrant population and an improved
economic outlook for the state.

Best of all, declaring English the official language is a measure that is
widely supported by citizens of all backgrounds. A Rasmussen Reports poll
conducted on Aug. 9-10 found that 83 percent of Americans support the
policy, and an even more overwhelming 94 percent believe English
proficiency is important to succeed in the United States.

While policymakers may believe they are benefiting Washington's immigrant
population by providing native language translations, reality could not be
farther from the truth. Diversity is an asset, and we should respect the
linguistic and cultural differences among residents of the United States.
But without a common factor to unite us in our diversity, we remain divided.

I encourage the Washington State Legislature to take action this year and
send a message to all residents that we are united through a common, shared
language, English.

*Mauro E. Mujica is the chairman of U.S. English, Inc., one of the nation's
oldest and largest nonpartisan citizens' action groups dedicated to
preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States.
Founded in 1983 by the late Sen. S.I. Hayakawa of California, U.S. English,
Inc. (www.usenglish.org <http://www.usenglish.org>) has more than 1.8
million members.*


N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20140829/480723f0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list

More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list