[lg policy] Oh, the Humanities! Disciplines Survived, Even Thrived, Despite Recession
haroldfs at GMAIL.COM
Mon Sep 8 15:00:26 UTC 2014
Oh, the Humanities! Disciplines Survived, Even Thrived, Despite Recession
By Max Lewontin
For humanities departments that are still struggling with the lingering
effects of the 2008 recession, it appears no news is the best news.
That’s one of the chief conclusions of a report released on Monday by the
American Academy of Arts and Sciences. The report stems from a survey of
the state of the humanities across 13 disciplines.
Despite continuing debates about the decline of the humanities and
heightened interest in STEM education and professional programs, the
authors of the report found that some of the oldest academic disciplines
had survived and even prospered in the face of the difficult recession
years, in which many colleges faced budget cuts and calls to revamp their
"We expected there would be more change," said Robert B. Townsend, director
of the academy’s office in Washington. "That was one of the surprises
coming out of this report."
The new survey results build on a previous one conducted during the 2007-8
academic year. This time around, the academy added five new disciplines to
its look at the humanities: classical studies, communication, folklore,
musicology, and philosophy.
The report does not incorporate any new departments beyond the programs
surveyed in 2007-8: art history, English, foreign languages, history,
history of science, linguistics, religion, and combined English and
foreign-language programs. Instead, it serves as another snapshot in time,
with updated information about the eight original disciplines, collected
during the 2012-13 academic year.
- Humanities Scholars See Declining Prestige, Not a Lack of Interest
- Humanities and Social Sciences Are Central to National Goals, Report
- Harvard Mounts Campaign to Bolster Undergraduate Humanities
- First National Picture of Trends in the Humanities Is Unveiled
- Opinion: The Humanities, Declining? Not According to the Numbers.
- A Collection of Articles and Commentaries on the Debate
The new data show that the unease of the recession years was not without
Foreign Languages Feel the Heat
The economic crunch between the two surveys delivered a sharper blow to
some departments than others, with foreign-language programs particularly
feeling the heat. By contrast, the number of students majoring in
linguistics increased slightly, the report says.
Colleges and universities cut 12 percent of their foreign-language degree
programs from 2007 to 2012 while canceling 21 percent of combined English
and foreign-language programs. Eighteen percent of those programs were at
public institutions. By contrast, the colleges and universities surveyed
cut about 6 percent of degree programs over all by 2013.
In the immediate wake of the recession, the future of foreign-language
education looked brighter.
A 2010 study by the Modern Language Association found that enrollment in
foreign-language and combined English and foreign-language programs had
increased 6.6 percent from 2006 to 2009, with more than 1.6 million
students enrolled in programs across the country.
A number of factors could be at the heart of the more recent cuts in
foreign-language programs, according to S. Paul Sandrock, director of
education at the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages,
which tracks teaching in elementary, secondary, and higher education.
Some programs might have been canceled because of a lack of teaching staff,
or consolidated into other programs. But the cuts remain sporadic over all,
Mr. Sandrock said.
Across the eight original disciplines, the humanities appeared to remain
relatively stable in terms of the number of departments and faculty
members, though the number of students majoring in humanities disciplines
The report had more-hopeful news for faculty members concerned about the
availability of stable employment in the humanities: Seventy-one percent of
those in the survey were employed in full-time positions, while less than
half had non-tenure-track or other part-time positions. In English the
number of full-time faculty members increased by 3 to 4 percent, while
part-time positions decreased by the same amount.
The number of female professors in tenure-track jobs increased across
nearly every original discipline, while the number of women receiving
tenure in history increased 3 to 4 percent.
Teaching Still a Priority
The report also asserts that, in the humanities, teaching remains a
priority, in addition to research. Full-time faculty members teach 86
percent of non-introductory courses to undergraduate students, and teaching
is considered an "essential" factor in making tenure decisions 78 percent
of the time across all the disciplines surveyed, the academy found.
In many departments, the use of new technology in teaching and scholarship
remains somewhat limited.
While nearly a third of the departments surveyed by the academy said they
had some form of online education in place during the 2012-13 academic
year, there was resistance to the use of digital-humanities technology when
it came to publishing and scholarship.
Nearly a quarter of the colleges surveyed reported having a center on the
campus dedicated to digital humanities, but only 15 percent offered a
seminar on the use of digital humanities in research and teaching.
Mr. Townsend, the academy researcher, said he wasn’t surprised.
While working on a report on job prospects for historians published by the
American Historical Association last spring, he found that many scholars
remained skeptical about books and journals published solely in an
"It took a lot of handholding to say, Look, these books are legitimate,
they’ve been vetted by a blue-ribbon commission," Mr. Townsend said.
But for now, despite the cuts in some foreign-language departments, the
humanities appear to have survived the initial years of the recession
"In some ways what was most striking," Mr. Townsend said, "is how little
difference there was."
Harold F. Schiffman
Professor Emeritus of
Dravidian Linguistics and Culture
Dept. of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305
Phone: (215) 898-7475
Fax: (215) 573-2138
Email: haroldfs at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list