[lg policy] Philippines: Proudly Multilingual

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at gmail.com
Wed Aug 19 14:48:11 UTC 2015


Proudly multilingual

I was lecturing recently in a class
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#> on linguistic
anthropology and using “Ilonggo” and “Hiligaynon” to refer to one of our
languages in the Visayas when a student raised his hand to clarify that
“Hiligaynon” should refer to the language and “Ilonggo” to the people whose
native language is Hiligaynon.

That was a useful reminder about how important language is for many people,
a sentiment that includes how one’s native language should be called.

August is “Buwan ng Wikang Filipino” or National Language Month, when
schools, in a burst of nationalism, have their students
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#> wear a barong or
baro’t saya to render a folk dance or play musical instruments.

I hope schools will remember that the original intention of a month for
language was to get people to link language to nationhood. That means
talking about the power of languages in our national life, including
English, and why, like it or not, it plays such an important role in our
public and private lives.

For starters, we could teach students (and fellow faculty) to stop using
“national costume” to refer to the barong and baro’t saya because, quite
simply, they are not theater clothes. You don’t hear Americans referring to
a coat and tie as “American costume,” do you? “Costume” was, consciously or
not, part of making non-Americans exotic, almost suggesting a “play time”
culture <http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#>.

Even the American description of our language situation was demeaning, with
Tagalog, Ilokano, Hiligaynon and all our other languages referred to as
“dialects.” Dialects are variations on a language, as in Metro Manila
Tagalog, Batangas Tagalog, Marinduque Tagalog, and so forth.

Calling a language a “dialect” is a demotion. Note the tone in people’s
voice when they ask, in English, “Do you speak the dialect?” (“the dialect”
suddenly a generic term that could mean any of the local—uttered,
low-kal—languages). It’s even worse when people say “the native dialect” as
a way of referring to the languages spoken by indigenous peoples.

*Linguistic pride*

Let’s be proud of our many languages. I think of August as a “Buwan ng mga
Wikang Filipino,” the use of the plural “mga” a way to celebrate our many
languages. The Department of Education’s requiring the use of a mother
language as the medium of instruction up to Grade 3 is a recognition of the
realities of multilingualism in the country.

In case there are readers not yet updated on this policy, the mother
language refers to the most frequently used language in a place. It can be,
for example, Hiligaynon, which means classes
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#> in places like
Iloilo and Bacolod would have to use that language.

The mother language policy will, undoubtedly, strengthen pride in mother
languages, but I’d like to see the “wikang Filipino” aspect strengthened in
the sense that we are referring to “Philippine languages”—languages spoken
by Filipinos.

Our identity as Filipino must include a respect for all Philippine
languages, including their potential for contributing to Filipino, the
national language. Note how people still tend to refer to Filipino as
Tagalog, which is not accurate because there is a still-emerging national
language that has incorporated words from different Philippine languages,
albeit Tagalog being the main source.

Let’s return to the preference of many Ilonggo folk to use “Hiligaynon” to
refer to their language, and “Ilonggo” to a kind of cultural
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#> identity based on
a common use of Hiligaynon.

It can be tricky here because I have heard many Ilonggos referring to their
language as Ilonggo, and sometimes even as “Bisaya,” a term that further
complicates matters. I’ve had repeated inquiries from readers whenever I
use the term “Cebuano.” Why, they ask, don’t I just use “Bisaya” or
“Binisaya?”

My reply is that “Bisaya” should not be reserved just for Cebuano because
there are many Visayan languages, the three most widely spoken ones being
Cebuano, Hiligaynon and Waray (spoken in Samar and Leyte). Using the
specific language name is important to declare its uniqueness, and its use
as a marker of one’s identity, something to the effect of “I am proudly
Waray.”

We should also work harder to counter ethnic prejudice that is tied to
language. Non-Bisayans, Tagalogs especially, are notorious for putting down
Cebuano and other Visayan languages, with snide jokes about the
pronunciation and intonation. The prejudice is often class-based. Note how
people will put down Cebuano and then praise Hiligaynon for being malambing
(affectionate). I tease people, arguing that when you hear Hiligaynon and
appreciate its lilt, you’re thinking of some rich hacendero from Ilonggo
areas.

*‘Pangalatok,’ ‘Intsik’ and other insults*

Linguistic sensitivity is part of something broader called cultural
competence, which is understanding and appreciating cultural differences.
This goes beyond political
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#> correctness.
Words are labels or tags, reflecting and shaping the way we look at the
world, and the people around us.

As an anthropologist, I teach
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#> students how to
be linguistically competent, the words to use and to avoid, starting with
language names. Use “Pangasinense” and never “Pangalatok,” a term that the
Pangasinense detest.

Your use of language names say something about you as well. Referring to
“salitang Muslim” will reflect your ignorance because there is no such
thing as a “Muslim language.” Even Arabic is not a “Muslim language.”
“Arabic” and “Arabs” refer to people who are not necessarily Muslim.

Similarly, there is no language called “Intsik,” which unfortunately is the
name of courses <http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#>
taught at the University of the Philippines Diliman. Many years back, when
I became dean of the College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, I received
letters from Chinese-Filipinos protesting “Intsik 10” and “Intsik 11.”

“Intsik” started out as a term of respect—in chiek, or his/her uncle—but,
through the decades, took on anti-Chinese meanings.

I used an academic argument in seeking a change of the “Intsik” course
names because “Intsik” in one’s transcript of grades confuses universities
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#> in other
countries, where language experts have never heard of a language called
Intsik. The proper course name should be Mandarin or Chinese, even
Putonghua, which is the Chinese way of referring to the language.

There was strong resistance to changing “Intsik.” I choose my battles and
didn’t pursue the matter so the course name stays, a painful affront to
many Intsik.

Let me end on a lighter note. I referred to language names as tags or
labels, and sometimes they are used with ambivalence, neither in praise nor
in contempt.

“Inglisero” is an extended—and loaded—tag. When used to refer to an adult,
it’s a gentle way of chiding the person for not being proficient in
Filipino. (Ouch, oops, I meant aray.) Used to refer to a child, though, it
can still be a way of praising, or criticizing, the parents, but with some
amazement at the child’s ability to use English.

I’m proud to say that with my kids
<http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#>, people will say,
“Ay, inglisero” (or “inglisera”) and then express more awe when they switch
to flawless Filipino. It’s good for the kids to feel the “wow” factor as
they switch from one language to another. Languages fascinate children, and
we owe it to them to help them discover what it means to be Filipino,
through the wealth of our many languages.

Read more:
http://opinion.inquirer.net/87732/proudly-multilingual#ixzz3jGwyin8t
Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bSAw-mF-0r4Q-4acwqm_6r&u=inquirerdotnet> |
inquirerdotnet
on Facebook
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bSAw-mF-0r4Q-4acwqm_6r&u=inquirerdotnet>



-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20150819/796c4648/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list


More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list