[lg policy] South Africa: Compulsory indigenous language plan delayed
hfsclpp at gmail.com
Mon Jan 19 20:43:28 UTC 2015
Compulsory indigenous language plan delayed January 19 2015 at 02:35pm
By LAUREN ANTHONY Comment on this story
hopscotch sxc] sxc.hu
Durban - The roll-out of the national Incremental Introduction of African
Languages (IIAL) has been delayed by a year to allow education departments
to iron out any issues with the implementation.
A decision was taken in 2013 to introduce a compulsory indigenous language
to the school curriculum, piloted at Grade 1 level in 251 select schools
across the country.
The drive behind the African Languages policy was to create a more cohesive
society, breaking down language barriers across race and culture lines.
The three-language plan was initially to be implemented last year, however
this was changed to a pilot project with 15 schools in the uMlazi, Pinetown
and Umgungundlovu school districts volunteering for the project.
National roll-out of the policy, which would be incrementally introduced at
all schools, was set for this year, however, it was decided in the latter
part of last year that another pilot year was needed.
Spokesman for the provincial department of education, Muzi Mahlambi, said
the department was still sorting out logistics for the project.
“The relevant educators who are proficient in the language must be sourced
and this affects funding.”
The curriculum would also need to be assessed and the subject worked into
He said the pilot would continue at the 15 schools at grades 1 and 2
“In a meeting held last year with the schools’ stakeholders it was
indicated that everyone was happy with the programme and that it was
beneficial to the learners and community.
“The project has such a positive effect on those learning another language
and is fostering national integration.”
The Department of Basic Education (DBE) was working closely with the
Department of Higher Education and Training to ensure higher education
institutions have appropriate teacher training programmes for African
languages for grades 1 to 9.
It also plans to offer the Funza Lushaka Bursary to potential students with
a National Senior Certificate (NSC) to train as specialist African language
Spokesman for the DBE, Elijah Mhlanga, said feedback had shown strong
support for the programme.
“The IIAL programme has been well received and supported by parents,
pupils, teachers and principals,” Mhlanga said.
“Learners were able to perform rhymes and songs and also read simple texts
in the new language in a period of eight to 10 weeks. Parents were
unanimous in their support for the continuation of the IIAL beyond Grade
Tim Gordon, chief executive of the national governing body foundation, said
the extra year for the pilot was welcomed.
“Every organisation that had input on this project said it shouldn’t be
rushed, rather take two years to do it so that staff and textbooks could be
He said the first pilot year had varying results across the country as it
had been implemented differently in different provinces.
“In the Western Cape 10 schools were selected and the education department
hired teachers who worked on an itinerant basis so one teacher would teach
at different schools on different days. This seems to have worked
effectively, whereas in the Eastern Cape it was piloted at 116 schools and
although they said it worked fine, we never saw credible reports of
Gordon said besides staffing and textbooks, there were other practical
issues that needed to be considered.
“The further you go with the project, it does get trickier. What do you do,
for example, if somebody has been learning Zulu for seven years and then
moves to another province where Sotho is being taught. It’s a compulsory
subject but unlike other subjects, languages aren’t something you can just
Gordon said because it was a compulsory subject it meant matric pupils
would eventually write eight subjects with the consensus currently being
that seven was already too many.
“There’s also the question of whether it should be an academic or
communicative subject. It’s a good project, which is why it’s encouraging
that the roll-out was not half-baked.”
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list