[lg policy] Pakistan: Supreme Court’s Urdu verdict: No language can be imposed from above

Wed Sep 16 15:53:41 UTC 2015

Supreme Court’s Urdu verdict: No language can be imposed from above

The Court has sadly overreached and ventured into the domain of executive.
But that is not the only issue with the apex Court’s decision

September 15, 2015, 6:01 pm
SHARE :
<http://nation.com.pk/Blogger/ummar-ziauddin2> Ummar Ziauddin
<http://nation.com.pk/Blogger/ummar-ziauddin2>

The recent Supreme Court decision in Constitution petition No.56 of 2003
has triggered debate on the language issue afresh. The decision aims to
implement Article 251 of the Constitution that provides for, inter alia,
arrangements to be made for Urdu to be used for official and other
purposes. The Court has sadly overreached and ventured into the domain of
executive. But that is not the only issue with the apex Court’s decision.

The Court opined that due to “non- implementation of this provision
[Article 251] a societal and linguistic divide has been created in
society…” This view is not tenable given the linguistic history of the
country. Pakistani state has been criticised in the past for its policy of
“Urdu Imperialism” by the dissidents. After independence, Urdu was
perceived as the language of “Mohajirs” and preferred language of educated
Punjabi elite who at the time controlled the power politics from western
egg. The implementation of it as national language was strongly resisted by
Bengali intelligentsia. They started a popular movement called the Bhasha
Ondolan which gained significant momentum by 1952. The state eventually had
to cave in and it made Bengali the national language alongside Urdu (from
1955 to 1971). Later on, similar but less driven reaction came from Sindhi
nationals.  In the seventies, language riots took place in Sindh in January
1971 and July 1972. It should have been appreciated by the Court that
“linguistic divide” and “classe[s]” are created only when one language
alone is promoted to the exclusion of others. This inevitably results in
marginalisation of communities who are not in dominant position and resist
the state measure associating their native language with their identity.

Pakistan is a heterogeneous society that is home to multiple languages.
Urdu is the mother tongue of only about 7.57% of the population today.
Apart from major languages like Punjabi, Pashto, Sindhi, Saraiki and
Balochi; there are 55 other languages spoken in the country. The Court is
right to emphasise:  “Empirical studies throughout the world (including
those by UNESCO) advocate the use of a child’s native language in
instruction since this is the language the child grows up with and which is
in use in his home and around him.” In Pakistani context, the native
language of a vast majority is not Urdu. Instead of taking a simplistic
view that Urdu language would have “real practical implications for the
Pakistani public” as it will optimise human and financial resources, the
Court should have deferred to executive discretion in creating pluralistic
culture in the society that seeks to abolishing the divide created by
state’s language policies. At most, the Court should have restricted itself
to the principle that lower classes ought to have access to what is
available to the elites in knowledge-acquisition.

Language grows on the creation of larger community. English has that
community. An estimated quarter of mankind is familiar with it. It has
emerged as the language of wider inter-cultural communication and has more
linguistic capital than any of the other languages in the global context.
As corollary of globalisation, English has been de-imperialised. And non-
English speaking world has played a pivotal part in this. It does not
belong to English speaking world anymore. Even in a country like Pakistan,
English language is no more an elitist preserve. It offers opportunities to
middle classes to get lucrative employment both in the public and private
sectors. Given the liberal trends of globalisation, as the country wrestles
to integrate in the world economy, English would only foster its linguistic
capital. Why should people develop their skills in English language today?
Simply for pragmatic reasons. The state should allow markets conditions to
influence the choice of people. At the same time, it should make efforts to
popularise all major languages, including Urdu, to a degree that no
language is perceived to be superior to any other language. This would
diminish the apparent linguistic and class divide in the country.

No language can be imposed from above. Languages don’t need elites and
their decrees for survival and popularity. They need social conditions to
thrive. The voluntary shift to opt for a certain language is only succeeded
by the enabling environment. It has to be made popular through culture.
Hebrew was revived after it had extinguished. Great efforts were made to
popularise the historic language before it served as the binding force for
modern Israel. By no account a dying language, Urdu can be further
popularised too through literature, songs, poetry, theatre and cinema etc
before any strict time frames are given for its usage for official and
other purposes. And that was the intention of the framers behind Article
251 of the Constitution. In this regard language policies, a sole
discretion of executive, can be formulated as they have been around the
world. For instance, the Court could have cited the works of leading
linguist Dr Tariq Rehman, Khaled Ahmed and Sahiba Mansoor –to name a few,
instead of relying on the letter of 1981 by the National Language Promotion
Department as possible state policy. Judges are not trained to draft
policies and every time, they overstep into the domain of executive,
despite noble intentions, they cause chaos.

*End piece:   *

In Pakistan Urdu has been the official carrier of the reductionist and
regressive ideology of the state. After partition, the state progressively
removed Hindi words from Urdu language apparently to purify it. With time
large number of official discourses have been disseminated and distributed
in Urdu to spread schizophrenic worldview. Languages don’t just reflect
social realties; they also construct them. Any effort to popularise the
language today must also deconstruct its unwarranted ideological baggage.
http://nation.com.pk/blogs/15-Sep-2015/supreme-court-s-urdu-verdict-no-language-can-be-imposed-from-above

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20150916/bbfe7fca/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list