[lg policy] Arizona: Column: Bilingual Broadcaster Busts Norms

[Harold Schiffman]

Column: Bilingual Broadcaster Busts Norms
------------------------------
By Maddie Pickens <http://www.wildcat.arizona.edu/staff/maddie-pickens> |
Published 22 hours ago
------------------------------

As if calls for deportation and border fences along Mexico and Canada
weren’t already sinking Republican chances of winning over Latino voters in
2016, Republican candidates have recently begun championing a new line of
rhetoric concerning the national language of the United States.

To be clear, the United States doesn’t have an official language. Various
movements have tried over the years to impart English with this honor, but
so far none have been successful, and English, Spanish, Mandarin and every
other language remain equally unofficial. Unfortunately, Carly Fiorina,
candidate for President of the United States, mistakenly identified English
as the official language in a recent television interview. Although this
isn’t a huge deal, it still seems like something someone running for the
most powerful job in the world should know.

What may become problematic for the Republican Party is that Fiorina’s
gaffe was just the beginning.

Soon after came Donald Trump criticizing Jeb Bush for speaking Spanish at
campaign rallies followed by Sarah Palin declaring on national television
that people should “speak American” in this country. It’s these comments,
coupled with the constant calls for deportation from Republican candidates,
that lead many to believe the GOP may struggle quite a bit with Latino
voters in 2016.

In a recent MSNBC/Telemundo/Marist poll Hillary Clinton, the Democratic
frontrunner, led Donald Trump, the current Republican frontrunner, 69-22
percent among Latino voters. Despite winning 44 percent of the Hispanic
vote in 2004, the Republican Party has since seen a steep decline in
support from Hispanics, a phenomena that can be partly attributed to their
far right positions on immigration.

What’s more problematic than the general inaccuracy surrounding U.S.
language policy is the way in which candidates for President are so quick
to label anything other than English as Un-American. The U.S. has long
toted its “Melting Pot” demographics and the diversity that separates it
from other Western countries. A country supposedly rooted in a foundation
of freedom would in theory fight to preserve the right of its citizens to
speak their language of choice.

With that said, the U.S. government, or at least the government of Arizona,
should look into broadening second language requirements in the K-12
system. High school students in Arizona don’t have to take any foreign
language classes to graduate and the Department of Education is unable to
force a state to change its education standards. It shouldn’t come as a
surprise then that only 20 percent of U.S. citizens, according to the 2010
census, speak two languages at home compared to the 60 percent or more in
most European countries.

The benefits to acquiring a second language and bilingualism in general are
numerous. Medically speaking, there is evidence to suggest that learning a
second language can help reduce the risk of Alzheimer’s and dementia as the
population ages. Additionally, learning a second language significantly
increases cognitive ability, which relates to memory, problem solving, and
logic.

And it’s not just health and academic benefits. Omar Pereyra, President of
Club Latino at the UA writes, “As an immigrant from Mexico that grew up
both in a Spanish and English speaking household I found it very beneficial
being able to communicate in both languages, because it allowed me to
connect with those that could not speak English, it helped me learn other
languages, and it allowed me to connect with my culture. It’s both
culturally important and it bridges the gap between cultures and people.”

With immigration debates drawing sizable attention from the media,
hopefully the U.S. can take advantage of this opportunity to engage in
meaningful dialogue about the benefits of bilingualism. For many, language
is a critical piece of their identity and heritage. Cultivating the unique
cultures of Americans, in addition to the medical, cognitive, and
educational benefits of learning a second language, are all testaments to
the ways in which bilingualism would only improve, and not detract from,
the melting pot of the United States. A renewed commitment to second
language programs and bilingualism in the U.S. would certainly mark an
ironic and helpful response to the incessant ignorance and xenophobia found
in the political arena.

http://www.wildcat.arizona.edu/article/2015/09/column-bilingual-broadcaster-busts-norms


-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20150922/e2489f87/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list