[lg policy] EU: Why maintaining multilingualism is better for social inclusion
hfsclpp at gmail.com
Thu Aug 25 11:08:44 EDT 2016
Why maintaining multilingualism is better for social inclusion
Research from the EU-funded MIME project has rejected the idea that
reducing the number of official EU languages would be more effective,
efficient and inclusive. Rather, they argue that such a policy would
exclude approximately four out of five Europeans from having a deep
understanding of official EU information.
[image: Why maintaining multilingualism is better for social inclusion]
The EU-funded MIME project is a four-year project that is studying
multilingualism in Europe, with a particular focus on its implications for
inclusion and social mobility, and as such is a prime position to be able
to offer solutions and suggestions to possible conflicts over official
language use in the EU. In a recent study led by the project’s coordinator,
Michele Gazzola, the argument for consolidating the official number of EU
languages was rejected as being socially divisive and would lead to many
millions of European citizens being linguistically excluded.
>From 24 to one (or three)?
The study was responding to a growing argument over recent years that the
EU should fully acknowledge the role of English as the continent’s
prevailing language, with the most radical commentators arguing that
English should become the EU’s sole official language (possibly regardless
of the recent Brexit vote). Less radical observers instead have argued for
a trilingual policy based on English, French and German.
Using data collected by Eurostat on almost 170 000 residents and their
language skills in 25 EU Member States, the study showed that if English
became the sole official language of the EU, 45 % of residents would have
no access to legal documents, EU institutional websites and to streamed
debates carried out in the European Parliament, due to not being able to
understand English. In essence, they would become linguistically excluded,
which could be viewed as a form of political disenfranchisement.
Additionally, when looking at EU residents who are neither native speakers
nor proficient in English, the proportion of residents who would have
difficulties in understanding political and legal EU documents increases to
79 %. This is four out of five Europeans. Thus, contrary to what is
commonly believed, proficiency in English is not a basic skill in Europe,
not even amongst younger adults.
Indeed, over 30 % of respondents aged 25-34 have no knowledge of English,
which is admittedly lower than the average of 45 %, but 74 % of respondents
in that age group do not speak English at a native or proficient level.
This corresponds closely to the average for the whole population at 79 %.
In essence, these percentages indicate that the young are more likely to
speak foreign languages than the older generations, but that doesn’t mean
that they better master them.
Although less drastic, an EU language policy based on English, French and
German would also be highly exclusionary too, as it would disenfranchise 26
% to 49 % of residents, depending on the indicator used, and these
percentages are going to increase considerably after the withdrawal of the
UK from the EU.
Instead, the study argues that multilingualism is not only the most
effective policy to convey information about the EU to its citizens, but it
is also the only truly inclusive policy. It is also a cost-effective
policy, at 1 % of the EU’s budget. A reduction in the EU’s official
languages would have regressive effects, particularly the least-educated EU
citizens (17 % of respondents with a university education had no knowledge
of English, compared to 47 % of respondents who only finished secondary
education). Thus, a contraction in official EU languages would hit the
poorest Europeans – residents in the higher income brackets are much more
likely to speak additional languages than those in the lowest.
With Eurosceptic movements and parties gaining prominence across Europe,
perhaps it has never been as urgent as now for the EU to ensure that it can
effectively communicate with all of its citizens through their native
languages. To do this, there must be clear political support for an
inclusive language policy that places top priority on fostering
For more information please see:
project website <http://www.mime-project.org/>
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list