[lg policy] South Africa: Unisa language fight rages on

[Harold Schiffman]

Unisa language fight rages on
Crime & Courts / 17 September 2016, 4:53pm
*ZELDA VENTER*

Pretoria News - Students at Unisa have only until October 21 to enrol for
courses next year and it is thus extremely urgent that the university be
provisionally interdicted from implementing its new English-only language
policy.

If not, thousands of students who want to study in Afrikaans would be
severely prejudiced, and they may not be able to do so at Unisa.
Picture: Thobile Mathonsi. Credit: PRETORIA NEWS

This is according to advocate Johan du Toit, acting for AfriForum, which
has not given up the fight to have Afrikaans as a language option for
students at Unisa.

On Friday, for the third time, it turned to the Gauteng High Court,
Pretoria, to try to force Unisa to put its all-English language policy on
hold, pending a later application for the court to review and set aside the
new policy.

Du Toit told Judge Roland Sutherland it had no option but to ask for an
urgent order, as Unisa would not relent and wait until the court ruled
before putting the policy in action.

Turning to the court in the normal way would take too long, as the
litigation could take months, Afriforum argued.

Students will enrol for the second semester from April 3 to April 28 next
year and an urgent order could also benefit them.

AfriForum in July lost its first-round effort to provisionally interdict
Unisa from implementing its new language policy on a technical point,.

Judge Nomsa Khumalo found the matter not to be urgent.

This was in spite of the fact that students have started enrolling for the
2017 academic year.

Du Toit said on Friday it was difficult to understand why Unisa was in such
a rush to change its language policy, arguing that the status quo could
continue until there was resolution of what Afriforum believed was a
vitally important constitutional issue - the right of students to study in
the language of their choice.

He claimed Unisa would not be inconvenienced at all if an interim order was
issued, placing the implementation of the new language policy on ice.

On the other hand, if the order was not granted, the prejudice to students
and prospective students would be enormous and irreversible, Du Toit argued.

However, Unisa said that while English was its official medium of study
from now on, the new language policy did not spell the end of Afrikaans as
a language at Unisa.

It was said that while new first-year students enrolling at Unisa did not
have Afrikaans as an option, second- and third-year students would be able
to complete their studies in Afrikaans if they chose to. This exemption
affects about 24 000 students.

It was argued on behalf of AfriForum that it heard for the first time on
June 24 that Unisa was going to become an all-English institution. This
decision was made without consulting with stakeholders involved, it claimed.

AfriForum’s understanding was that the Unisa senate still had to give the
final go-ahead to the new policy in October. But counsel for Unisa said the
decision to adopt the new language policy had been made in April this year.
It was argued that it became policy then, with the senate due to get
feedback on the implementation when it met next month.

According to the university, it was practically not possible to continue
providing Afrikaans as a language of tuition at Unisa, and its policy was
in line with that of other universities.

The court heard that Unisa had considered and debated the updating of its
language policy on an ongoing basis since 2013, with change to the official
language policy an agenda item since that time.

Judgment will be delivered on the matter on September 21.

http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/unisa-language-fight-rages-on-2069491


-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20160918/aad51602/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list