[lg policy] India: Cow belt’s hypocrisy over three-language formula exposed

Fri Apr 21 15:07:01 UTC 2017

 Cow belt’s hypocrisy over three-language formula exposed  The
three-language formula has been subverted in Hindi-speaking states where
students opt for Sanskrit but can neither read, speak or write in it
Ashlin Mathew
Apr 20th 2017, 09.26 PM
SHARE

The last comprehensive language Census, carried out in 2001, had put the
number of Sanskrit speakers in the country at just 14,000. These numbers
were less than anticipated since many students in the Hindi-speaking
states, as well as the national capital Delhi, opt to study Sanskrit.

In Delhi alone, in 2015-16, as many as 1,94,801 students were enrolled to
study Sanskrit, which was being taught in 98% of the schools. In 1,024
government schools in the national capital, official records put the number
of Sanskrit teachers at 4,296 which translates into one Sanskrit teacher
for every 45 students.

The figures acquire significance because of the renewed debate on the
three-language formula implemented in 1968, following recommendation by the
Kothari Commission. The recent debate has been triggered by media reports
that Hindi has been made mandatory up to Class 10 and that the ‘President
has accepted recommendations made by the Parliamentary Standing Committee
on *Raj Bhasha*’.

A major recommendation floated by the Standing Committee was that people
occupying Constitutional posts should deliver addresses in Hindi, even in
cases they are not able to read and speak the language.

The proposal was made way back in 2011 and it is still not clear why the
reports have begun to surface only now.

Predictably, however, the reports have still caused an uproar.

The ‘imposition’ of Hindi on South Indians, the predominant language in 10
out of 29 states, coupled with the reluctance of North Indians to learn a
‘South Indian’ language has thrown the debate wide open. The language
Census of 2001 recorded that 25% of the population had Hindi as their
mother tongue.

While Indian students have been expected to learn their mother tongue,
Hindi, and one other language under the 1968 formula, school-goers in
Hindi-speaking states seem to have got away by opting for Sanskrit and not
learning English either.

In other words, judging by the Census figures
<http://www.nationalheraldindia.com/news/2017/04/20/*http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_Data_Online/Language/Statement3.htm>,
a vast majority of students in the cow-belt are neither literate in
English, nor proficient in Sanskrit
<http://www.nationalheraldindia.com/news/2017/04/20/*http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_Data_Online/Language/Statement1.aspx>
.

When an attempt was made to end the use of English as the language for
official communication back in 1965, Tamil Nadu erupted in protests which
even sparked off riots in Madurai. Peace could only return after then Prime
Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri assured state residents that English would
continue to be used as the official language until the nation reached a
consensus over Hindi.

“I am happy with the three-language formula, whereby every Indian child
would compulsorily learn three languages in school – English, Hindi and a
regional language of their choice (usually the language of the state).
Where the language of the state is already Hindi, children could be
encouraged to learn a South Indian language just as South Indian children
have to learn Hindi. This would eliminate concerns about marginalisation.
But Sanskrit could also be an acceptable substitute,” Shashi Tharoor, the
Lok Sabha MP from Thiruvananthapuram, told *National Herald* in an email
interview.

Tharoor remarked that pushing people in high offices to make speeches in
Hindi was silly. “The language chosen should vary according to the fluency
of the speaker, the nature of the occasion and the identity of the
audience.”

Rajya Sabha MP Swapan Dasgupta agreed with Tharoor.

“The three-language formula exists and it is possible to find a workable
solution within the existing framework. There was no compelling need to
revisit the issue,” said Dasgupta.

A Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader, NS Kanimozhi, however, reckoned
that the three-language formula has been “subverted” in the northern states.

“Why should one language be given preference, when many languages exist?
Making anything compulsory doesn’t help. The three-language formula is in
place, but this formula has been subverted in northern parts of the
country, especially rural areas, where children are taught Hindi, English
and Sanskrit. No one cares to opt for any other language,” Kanimozhi
told *National
Herald*.

Professor Apoorvanand, a Hindi professor at Delhi University, believed that
lax enforcement of the three-language policy in the North was leading to
“many native languages dying out.”

“In many of the states in South India, except for Tamil Nadu, Hindi is
being taught, but those from the Hindi-speaking areas are not learning any
other language,” the academic said.

“There was no need for the notification now, but there has been a move to
make the country Hindi-dominated. It would create nothing but suspicion.
Look at our currency notes. Devanagari numerals have replaced the
Constitution-approved international numerals, which are of Indian origin.
It is an unconstitutional move,” Apoorvanand added.

A supporter of the three-language policy, Congress MP Tharoor remarked that
“homogenisation” stood no chance in a diverse country like India, saying,
“If such decisions are part of a BJP-led project of Hindi, Hindu,
Hindustan, it will only divide the nation at a time when unity is what we
all need.”

http://www.nationalheraldindia.com/news/2017/04/20/cow-belt-hypocrisy-over-three-language-formula-exposed-sanskrit-hindi-english-india-tamil-nadu

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20170421/128a7009/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list