[lg policy] Tennessee’s new “plain meaning” law is plainly ambiguous and discriminatory
Baron, Dennis E
debaron at illinois.edu
Mon May 1 03:08:15 UTC 2017
There’s a new post on the Web of Language: http://bit.ly/2oZ831v
Tennessee’s new “plain meaning” law is plainly ambiguous and discriminatory
When laws don’t define the words that they contain, we’re supposed to give those words their plain or ordinary meaning. A Tennessee bill, passed on April 27 and awaiting the governor’s signature, would take this common practice of legal interpretation and turn it into a law, only with a twist: the Tennessee plain meaning law has a hidden meaning that is plainly discriminatory.
Read the full post on the Web of Language: http://bit.ly/2oZ831v
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20170501/8c4a309a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list
mailing list