[lg policy] Allister: Belfast Council’s Irish language officer linked to Union Flag vote

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at gmail.com
Thu May 4 10:47:24 EDT 2017


 Allister: Belfast Council’s Irish language officer linked to Union Flag
vote
[image: Protestors in Belfast demanded the introduction of an Irish
language act during a demonstration at the beginning of April]
Protestors in Belfast demanded the introduction of an Irish language act
during a demonstration at the beginning of April

This week’s vote for an Irish language officer at Belfast City Council is
linked to the vote in 2012 to remove the Union Flag from city hall, TUV
leader Jim Allister has said.

He said: “I’ve nothing against people learning a language but the special
place demanded for Irish, and the ocean of public money demanded for it, is
not only totally unreasonable but part of the republican agenda to remove
the British identity of Northern Ireland.

“There is a direct link between this decision at city hall and the decision
a few years ago to remove the Union Flag from the building.”

Belfast councillors voted on Tuesday to put the role of an Irish language
officer out to consultation. Unionists opposed the motion while SF,
Alliance, SDLP and People Before Profit supported it.

Mr Allister said: “This is but the latest manifestation of Sinn Fein’s
aggressive policy of pushing the Irish language and the Alliance Party’s
complicity with the same.

“Bad as it is the £39,000 annual cost will be a drop in the ocean should a
fully fledged Irish language act be foisted upon Northern Ireland.”

Belfast UUP councillor Chris McGimpsey spent five years in the early 1990s
promoting the Irish language, but said he could not support a Sinn Fein
motion attempting to use it as a political weapon.

He said: “When I travelled all over Ireland talking about the Irish
language from a unionist perspective I got a tremendous response. A lot of
people were very unhappy with Sinn Fein for trying to politicise it.

“I think attitudes to the Irish language have improved but we need to see
it promoted in a politically neutral way. Unionists have once again let
Sinn Fein set the agenda.

“Arlene is now listening to Irish language groups, what I was doing 25
years ago.

“For those of us who actually see a value in the Irish language, we’ve got
to see if we can bring it forward.

“The Irish language should be something that unites us, not divides us.”

He said the Alliance Party’s support of the motion was an attempt to
attract more nationalist votes.

Reacting immediately after the vote, DUP councillor Lee Reynolds called it
a “love in” between Alliance and SF.

An Alliance spokesperson said the party backed its “long-standing policy”
when it supported council’s plans for an updated language policy.

They added: “Our best future is one where politicians work for everyone,
not just one section of our community, and while others want to ignore the
positives of this policy for their own gain, Alliance continues to make its
own decisions, aiming to build a welcoming, inclusive diverse city.”

Belfast’s Irish language officer would be treated as a principal officer
receiving between £29,323 and £39,177 per year.

Newry, Mourne and Down District has three staff members in its Irish
language unit.

Its Irish language development officer falls into the £29,323 and £31,601
principal officer grade.

The unit also has a community liaison officer and administrative assistant.

http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/allister-belfast-council-s-irish-language-officer-linked-to-union-flag-vote-1-7944947

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write
directly to the original sender of any offensive message.  A copy of this
may be forwarded to this list as well.  (H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20170504/ccfe4489/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list


More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list