RE: [lg policy] Pakistan: ‘More than one national language will not threaten security’
dzo at bisharat.net
Thu Sep 7 09:09:33 EDT 2017
Quick reflection on this item Hal shared earlier this year. Three items:
1. The term “national language” has more than one meaning or application. There are at least 2 ways of using it, one unique and exclusive (the one language of all the nation), and the other multiple and potentially inclusive (languages that are part of the nation, generally spoken by a particular demographic, but perhaps by other groups). In either case one or more national languages may be designated by legislation.
2. The terms and concepts of “national language” on the one hand, and “official language” on the other, are frequently equated or confused (one gets that impression with this article). This is perhaps understandable in popular discourse, though not helpful. However, since the terms are used differently and even given more or less precise definitions in various contexts, it behooves those of us with more understanding of the subject to define what we mean when using them, and to clarify the differences where both are used.
3. Mr. Sufi’s remarks about many languages and national unity in Pakistan recall Nigerian linguist Ayo Bamgbose’s discussion of the “myth of divisiveness” that one language always unites and many languages necessarily divide.
From: lgpolicy-list-bounces at groups.sas.upenn.edu [mailto:lgpolicy-list-bounces at groups.sas.upenn.edu] On Behalf Of Harold Schiffman
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 10:37 AM
To: lp <lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu>
Subject: [lg policy] Pakistan: ‘More than one national language will not threaten security’
‘More than one national language will not threaten security’ <http://www.dawn.com/news/1316079/more-than-one-national-language-will-not-threaten-security>
Ikram Junaidi <http://www.dawn.com/authors/263/ikram-junaidi> — Updated about 11 hours ago
ISLAMABAD: Decision makers should know that having more than one national language will not pose a threat to national security, and history shows that one language does not ensure a country will remain intact, said Punjabi writer Mushtaq Sufi.
“A narrative is being constructed for the last 70 years that there should be one national language because that is the only way the country can remain strong,” Mr Sufi said while speaking at a two-day symposium held at the Pakistan Academy of Letters (PAL) on Monday.
“Urdu was imposed as the only national language in the country, a move which invited resistance in East Pakistan from the very beginning. So that narrative is not correct historically,” he said.
Mushtaq Sufi said many countries have various official languages including Canada, Iran, Russia, Belgium, India and Afghanistan among others and that the plurality of their national languages has not posed a threat to their national security.
On the other hand, only one of 22 languages are spoken in the Arab world, where a single language has not guaranteed security, he argued.
Writers, literati gather to draft policy for government regarding the status of languages in Pakistan
“Pakistan is situated in an area where multiple languages have been spoken for centuries and scholars say this diversity is an asset. I am a Punjabi and I am not afraid of the other languages in the country. I believe that there is no alternate for any language because languages are more of a way to see the world that they are a way to communicate,” he said.
“It is unfortunate that the languages of those who helped build the country, including the Bengalis, Baloch, Sindhi and Pakhtoon, are considered a threat to the country,” he added.
Baloch writer Panah Baloch said terrorism can only be eradicated by promoting local languages which impart the message of the sufis.
“The local language is taught in Sindh which is why we can hardly find a Sindhi terrorist. Iran included Balochi in the curriculum due to which many issues have been addressed,” he said.
Pakhtun writer Noorul Amin Yousafzai said people should have the right to receive education in any language. He said five languages have been included in the curriculum in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and that the curriculum board is working on the matter.
Educationist Prof Dr Javed Iqbal pointed out that the Khushal Khan Khattak University in KP does not have a Pashto department.
Two participants said Urdu is spoken across the country and should not be referred to as a foreign language.
“Urdu is the language of Punjab and was spoken here before Pakistan came into being. There are many dialects in Punjabi which means Punjabi cannot replace Urdu, not even in Punjab,” said a participant, Arshad Mehmood.
Writer Tariq Rehman said the ruling elite thinks adopting more languages will not be in their interests.
“These kinds of decisions are not feasible for multilingual states and that is why the problem in Bengal started,” he said.
PAL Chairman Dr Qasim Bugio said that the PPP had made many efforts for drafting a language policy and that the PML-N had included addressing the issue on its mandate. Efforts were also made in the National Assembly and the Senate to declare more languages as national languages, which could so far not be done.
“PAL therefore decided to invite literary figures to discuss the issue during a two day symposium, which is being held in connection with mother languages day, and prepare a draft policy for the government. We hope that political parties will consider the draft because it will be prepared by the academia,” he said.
On Feb 21, 1952, students of the Dhaka University had held a protest, demanding that Bangla be declared a national language of Pakistan because 56pc of the country’s population spoke the language.
The police opened fire at them during which five students were killed. Unesco declared the day the students were killed the International Day of Mother Languages, which is now observed worldwide.
Published in Dawn, February 21st, 2017
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal, and to write directly to the original sender of any offensive message. A copy of this may be forwarded to this list as well. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list
More information about the Lgpolicy-list