[lg policy] The case of English in Namibia

Harold Schiffman haroldfs at gmail.com
Sat Oct 27 10:10:59 EDT 2018

 The case of English in Namibia

Oct 26, 2018Admin <https://thepatriot.com.na/index.php/author/admin/>Opinions
& Analysis <https://thepatriot.com.na/index.php/category/opinions-analysis/>

Placed on a podium and yet, blamed for doing what should be done on the

The lack of interest and love for our indigenous languages; the increased
number of indigenous Namibians who are unable to speak, and lack interest
in the use of their native languages and the lack of growing our indigenous
languages are commonly blamed on the prominence of the English language
within the Namibian linguistic landscape. To begin with, it is not uncommon
in our country to find citizens regarding speaking indigenous languages as
a sign of weakness, inferiority, uneducatedness; and of recent a sign of
tribal eccentricity. The latter is even alluded to by distinct high office
bearers in Government, who publicly declare that to build “the Namibian
house” we need to use English (only), because if we use our individual
indigenous (ethnic) languages we are promoting “tribalism”. I leave this
one here.
In Namibia, the English language is fortunately highly celebrated. While it
is a foreign language and of course our official language and a language of
wider communication and commerce, English continues to play key roles in
our beloved society. One, it is a language which enables us to communicate
with each other within this multilingual and multicultural society, as well
as with the wider global village. Two, it is one language most preferred
than other languages; including our own indigenous languages. Therefore I
say, there is nothing wrong with English. What the English language does,
is to perform the roles given it and occupy the space allocated for it
(does what should be done when placed on the podium all alone).
At independence, the Government of the Republic of Namibia adopted English
as an official language, a language of wider communication and a language
of instruction in schools. This was done through the language policy which
was adopted soon after independence, as a means to meet societal needs in a
newly independent Namibia. In deciding to make English the official
language, the Government was guided by several understandings.
Two such understandings are that the official language should be 1. A
medium of cultural transmission, 2.  A language of international
connections, NOT foreign cultural domination (Ministry of Education and
Culture, 1993). These two understandings differ from what transpired on the
ground with regard to implementing English as a language of instruction and
an official language; especially in relation to indigenous languages use,
uplifting and maintenance (The portion allocated for indigenous languages
as per language policy and the relationship they share with English, will
be further discussed as a single subject; for today we leave it here).
Notice the element in the above understandings… a medium of cultural
transmission… Whose culture do we want to promote with English? In my
understanding, language is part of a culture of its given speakers, and we
promote culture by the use of the language of a specific ethnic
divide/group. The second understanding is that English be A language of
international connections, NOT foreign cultural domination… The last part
here is of distinct interest, in my view. It was intended that with the
English language we should not promote foreign cultural domination.
What I want to mention here is that, as long as you own and use a foreign
language you are inevitably promoting a foreign culture, and in many events
foreign domination. Remember that language is a medium of cultural
transmission and power. No language promotes a culture different from that
of its native speakers. That is why a distinct African writer/novelist
Ngugi wa Thiongo from Kenya opted to begin to write in Kikuyu around the
1970s, as can surely be agreed, for political reasons. His essay
“Decolonising the mind” speaks volumes.
Yes, we are aware that more value is placed on the English language. But
let me be quick to say here that, the value placed on English, is so done
by us, not by itself. It shows who we are, what we regard our own and
others’.  Indigenous languages on the other hand, are faced with so many
shifts as currently observed from their use, to the use of English. In line
with the latter, the likelihood of language “desertion” for our indigenous
languages is foreseen if nothing is done to stop this trend. Many of our
children and youth do not speak, understand and even care about their
native languages. This is not their fault, it is what we made them to see,
believe and understand.
The onus, therefore, of reversing the on-going trend of indigenous
languages polarisation due to English preference lies within mother tongue
speakers. There is need for (it is up to) individual speakers to preserve
and retain their languages which are carriers of their heritage, culture
and identity as a people; so that these languages do not completely
disappear. Remember that when a language disappears, dies, extinct, it does
so with the culture, values and even the cultural education and artefacts
of its speakers.
While the decline of the Namibian indigenous languages is blamed on the
English language many critics and language scholars have taken a different
stance regarding this issue in recent times. They argue that the blame for
the decline and at times stagnation of our indigenous languages should
instead be placed on the people themselves for not doing much to maintain,
develop and promote their own languages. We should stop blaming English for
our lack of interest in our own languages and start to find ways to make
our languages equally enticing and grow them.
It is common that one observes pathetically situations where speakers
cannot consistently express themselves in their native (indigenous)
language without borrowing word(s) or phrases from English. Such speakers
seem to be comfortable with this trend, therefore perceive it as normal.
Mention be further made that, to many Namibians, English is regarded as the
language of status, of the educated and the privileged. Unfortunately, the
same cannot be said about our indigenous languages. Therefore, one should
not be surprised to find speakers of the same language, (let us say
Oshiwambo), speaking to each other in English instead of doing so in
Oshiwambo even if it is in unofficial contexts.
Many Namibians rarely speak their native languages, but English. The
question I want to ask is; does this have to do with the status placed on
the English language? The answer is yes, and this has everything to do with
us who placed English that high, and not with English itself. Speaking
English is mistakenly equated with being educated and civilised. At times
using indigenous languages is prohibited, discouraged or just ignored. It
is looked down upon. English is accorded a higher status over and above
indigenous languages, and yet blamed for the current stagnating status of
our indigenous languages.
When he was honoured with an honorary doctorate from the University of
Namibia, a successful business man Frans Aupa Indongo, made his reception
speech in Otshikwambi. Many of his audience in the graduation ceremony
including those who can understand Oshiwambo did not want to listen to what
he was saying simply because he was not speaking English. Does this mean
that we feel, and come to believe that our own languages; and therefore we
are inferior? Do we want to say that, unless an individual can express
him/herself in English, his/her views should and shall go unheard?
Going back to the situation in our local schools. Scholars such Harleck
Jones recommend the use of local languages in classrooms, for teachers to
help learners understand difficult concepts; teachers never do this; if
they do, they will be labelled that they are teaching kids in the
vernacular language and might even lose their jobs. I can frankly mention
here that there is a worrisome trend of the decline and stagnation in the
use and advancemnet of indigenous languages or half use thereof, a trend
which needs to be reversed. Blame it on us and not on the English language.


 Harold F. Schiffman

Professor Emeritus of
 Dravidian Linguistics and Culture
Dept. of South Asia Studies
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305

Phone:  (215) 898-7475
Fax:  (215) 573-2138

Email:  haroldfs at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20181027/ef06d83f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list

More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list