<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%" bgColor=#ffffff border=0>
<TD class=teaserText vAlign=top colSpan=2><SPAN class=storyHeadline>L.A.
Times Bans 'Resistance Fighters' in Iraq News</SPAN><BR><SPAN
class=teaserText><I>Wed November 05, 2003 09:21 PM ET
</I></SPAN><BR><BR>By Dan Whitcomb
<P>LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The Los Angeles Times has ordered its reporters
to stop describing anti-American forces in Iraq as "resistance fighters,"
saying the term romanticizes them and evokes World War II-era heroism.
<P>The ban was issued by Melissa McCoy, a Times assistant managing editor,
who told the staff in an e-mail circulated on Monday night that the phrase
conveyed unintended meaning and asked them to instead use the terms
"insurgents" or "guerrillas."
<P>McCoy told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday that the memo followed
a discussion among top editors at the paper and was not sparked by reader
complaints. The memo first surfaced on the Web site L.A. Observed
<P>"(Times Managing Editor) Dean Baquet and I both individually had the
same reaction when we saw the term used in the newspaper," McCoy said.
"Both of us felt the phrase evoked a certain feeling, that there was a
certain romanticism or heroism to the resistance."
<P>McCoy said she considered "resistance fighters" an accurate description
of Iraqis battling American troops, but it also evoked World War II --
specifically the French Resistance or Jews who fought against Nazis in the
<P>"Really, it was something that just stopped us when we saw it, and it
was really about the way most Americans have come to view the words,"
<P>McCoy said she was confident that the Times reporters who used the term
had no intention of romanticizing the Iraqis who have killed more than 100
U.S. soldiers since Washington declared major combat over in May, and that
the paper's Baghdad bureau had no objection to the policy change.
<P>NOT COOL OR NEUTRAL
<P>The policy change reflects the highly politicized atmosphere
surrounding the war in Iraq, which has brought charges of biased reporting
from all sides of the political spectrum.
<P>McCoy said she did not know how many readers had made complaints about
the use of the term.
<P>"We are loath to proscribe the use of just about any word," she said.
"But sometimes certain combinations of words send an unintended signal.
You combine these two seemingly innocuous words and suddenly they have
this unintended meaning."
<P>Allan Siegal, assistant managing editor of the New York Times, told
Reuters that he agreed with the decision made by his West Coast rivals.
<P>"We don't have a policy but when you mentioned the phrase it sounded
like romanticizing to me," Siegal said. "I don't think it's the kind of
cool, neutral language we like to see."
<P>But David Hoffman, foreign editor of the Washington Post, said his
paper had used the phrase "resistance fighters" to describe Iraqi forces
and had no objection to the term.
<P>"They are resisting an American occupation so it's not inaccurate,"
Hoffman said. "We try to be as precise as possible and distinguish whether
they are former Baath party, Fedayeen, outsiders, insiders. But that's not
<P>According to a search of the Lexis-Nexis database, The Los Angeles
Times has employed the term "resistance fighters" dozens of times in the
past six months, including three references on Monday.
<P>On Tuesday, the day after McCoy issued her memo, the paper used it in
an editorial, which criticized the Bush administration for a lack of
humility and candor over Iraq.
<TD vAlign=top colSpan=2>
<TD class=photoCaptionText vAlign=top colSpan=2>© Copyright Reuters
var year = new Date()
2003. All rights reserved. Any copying, re-publication or re-distribution
of Reuters content or of any content used on this site, including by
framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without prior written
consent of Reuters.
<P>Quotes and other data are provided for your personal information only,
and are not intended for trading purposes. Reuters, the members of its
Group and its data providers shall not be liable for any errors or delays
in the quotes or other data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
var year = new Date()
2003. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the
Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the
Reuters group of companies around the world.