[Linganth] Fwd: [PHILOS-L] The Lex Academic Essay Prize on Linguistic Discrimination

[Yael Peled]

The following announcement may be of interest to list subscribers.

All good wishes,


Yael



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Lisa Bortolotti <L.Bortolotti at BHAM.AC.UK>
> Subject: [PHILOS-L] The Lex Academic Essay Prize on Linguistic Discrimination
> Date: March 7, 2022 at 08:59:49 EST
> To: PHILOS-L at liverpool.ac.uk
> Reply-To: Lisa Bortolotti <L.Bortolotti at BHAM.AC.UK>
> 
> Dear all
>  
> As part of the special issue "Understanding Bias" edited by Katherine Puddifoot at Durham University,Philosophical Psychology is delighted to announce the Lex Academic® <http://www.lexacademic.com/?utm_source=CPB&utm_medium=cms&utm_campaign=JPG15743%20> Essay Prize.
> This prize will be awarded to the author of the best essay on the understanding of linguistic discrimination, a philosophical preoccupation of both the journal and Lex Academic.
>  
> Benefits include:
> Editorial services on the prize-winning submission provided gratis by Lex Academic
> £1000 awarded to the author of the prize-winning submission
> Free access to the prize-winning submission granted by Philosophical Psychology for one year from the date of online publication
>  
> Eligible submissions are expected to focus on linguistic discrimination.
> Topics may include – but are not limited to – the following:
> Intentional and unintentional linguistic discrimination
> Linguistic bias in philosophy and/or academia more generally
> Does Anglophone philosophy have a problem with linguistic bias?
> Are there sources of evidence or methods that can fruitfully be used to understand unintentional linguistic discrimination that have not previously been used?
> Are there any issues of linguistic justice/injustice surrounding the use of some approaches to academia over others?
> How, if at all, can insights gleaned using different methodologies and evidence-sources be integrated into a coherent picture of unintentional linguistic discrimination?
> What should happen if different approaches to linguistic discrimination yield different accounts of what linguistic discrimination is like?
> How is it possible to adjudicate between different accounts developed using different methodologies or evidence?
> Should some approaches to combatting unintentional linguistic discrimination be prioritised over others?
> Do the Barcelona Principles for a Globally Inclusive Philosophy <http://www.ub.edu/biap/bp/?utm_source=CPB&utm_medium=cms&utm_campaign=JPG15743%20> go far enough? Do they go too far?
> What can institutes of higher education and related funding bodies do to help level the linguistic playing field in academia?
>  
> Lex Academic® <http://www.lexacademic.com/?utm_source=CPB&utm_medium=cms&utm_campaign=JPG15743%20> is a specialist author services firm supporting thousands of academics and global institutions with the finest English academic copy-editing, indexing, and translation. 
> Their mission is to level the playing field for international researchers in the social sciences, arts, and humanities.
>  
> Find out more about the prize and the CFP on Understanding Bias (deadline 28 February 2023):https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/philosophical-psychology-understanding-bias <https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/philosophical-psychology-understanding-bias>
>  
> Check out other CFPs for special issues in Philosophical Psychology:
> COVID-19 Collective Irrationalities (deadline 31 March 2022)https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/philosophical-psychology-covid-19-collective-irrationalities <https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/philosophical-psychology-covid-19-collective-irrationalities>
> Philosophy and Psychopathology (deadline 30 June 2022)https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/philosophical-psychology-philosophy-psychopathology <https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/philosophical-psychology-philosophy-psychopathology>
> Trustworthiness: Individual and Institutional Dimensions (deadline 31 October 2022)https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/trustworthiness-individual-institutional-dimensions <https://think.taylorandfrancis.com/special_issues/trustworthiness-individual-institutional-dimensions>
>  
> With all best wishes
> Lisa Bortolotti
>  
>  
>  
> Philos-L "The Liverpool List" is run by the Department of Philosophy, University of Liverpool https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy/philos-l/ <https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/philosophy/philos-l/> Messages to the list are archived at http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html <http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/philos-l.html>. Recent posts can also be read in a Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/PhilosL/ <https://www.facebook.com/PhilosL/> Follow the list on Twitter @PhilosL. Follow the Department of Philosophy @LiverpoolPhilos To sign off the list send a blank message to philos-l-unsubscribe-request at liverpool.ac.uk <mailto:philos-l-unsubscribe-request at liverpool.ac.uk>.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/linganth/attachments/20220307/35b41a7a/attachment.htm>