[Linganth] LLMs and Linguistic Anthropology Reading Group - September 23 - 18:00-20:00 CET
Anna Weichselbraun
anna.weichselbraun at univie.ac.at
Thu Sep 5 09:08:25 UTC 2024
Dear members of the listserv,
In order to continue the discussions started with our Panel 296 at the
recent 4S/EASST Conference in Amsterdam entitled "LLMs and the Language
Sciences <https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/easst-4s2024/p/14375>", we'd
like to invite you to a monthly reading workshop. The aims of this
seminar are to bring together STS and Linguistic Anthropology in order
to think through LLMs as sociotechnical artefacts, largely structured by
language ideologies.
First online meeting:*September 23, 2024 - 18:00-20:00 Central European
Time (CET)*
Zoom link:
RSVPhere: *languagemachinesnetwork at gmail.com
<mailto:languagemachinesnetwork at gmail.com>*by September 20th to receive
the*Zoom*link and the*paper*.
Our first meeting will discuss Michael Castelle's (Warwick) paper:
Contextualizing high-dimensional communication: the relevance of
linguistic anthropology for theorizing large language models
Short abstract:
This paper provides an overview of the fundamental relevance of the
field of linguistic anthropology to the understanding and/or
critique of Large Language Models, clarifying aspects of current
debates about LLMs within NLP research as well as among those in the
social science and humanities.
Long abstract:
At the core of the controversiality of Large Language Models (LLMs), on
the one hand, their implicit rejection of influential theories in
mainstream linguistics and cognitive science; and on the other, the
unconscious adoption of interactional paradigms — such as the overt
dialogicality of the "instruction-tuned" ChatGPT — championed more
frequently in the humanities and social sciences as fundamental to
sense-making. Indeed, many computer scientists in contemporary NLP do
not find it necessary to concern themselves with the wide variety of
past or present theories of language and learning. However, a prominent
and arguably misguided assumption has been made by members of the AI
research community that applying increasing scale to these models'
training data, training time, and/or architectural size is likely to
lead to the achievement of superhuman intelligence; this perspective,
like many individualist approaches to cognition, necessarily downplays
the role of indexical embodiment, social interaction, and contextually
reflexive cultural practices in already-sociotechnical human
communication. I will argue that a better understanding of the field
known as linguistic anthropology can help understand both current and
future successes and failure modes of LLMs, as well as helping social
scientists and humanists to avoid some common, but misguided, avenues of
critique for LLMs. From century-old works of American anthropological
linguistics to the more contemporary insights of Michael Silverstein's
theories of pragmatics and metapragmatics, this resolutely empirical —
but semiotically and ethnographically well-grounded — school of thought
provides surprising insights into both the intriguing strengths and
fundamental limits of these computational artifacts.
Please feel free to circulate this call for participation. If you intend
to join the meetings, pleaseRSVP here:languagemachinesnetwork at gmail.com
<mailto:languagemachinesnetwork at gmail.com> by September 20th to receive
the paper and the Zoom link!
Hoping to see you all there!
Siri, Anna and Michael
--
Universitätsassistentin (post-doc) | Department of European Ethnology |
University of Vienna
Twitter <https://twitter.com/annaweichselb>
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/anna-weichselbraun/>
http://www.annaweichselbraun.com <http://www.annaweichselbraun.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/linganth/attachments/20240905/83b346c6/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Linganth
mailing list