Channel PERFECTIVE > MIDDLE
Wolfgang Schulze
W.Schulze at LRZ.UNI-MUENCHEN.DE
Tue Oct 6 04:40:57 UTC 2009
Dear Enrique,
I think, Indo-European is a slightly different case. Diego talked about
his observation that in
> Bocotá, a language of Panama, the marker -/du /has been described as a
> marker of perfective aspect (Gunn 1975), while in Buglere, a dialect
> of Bocotá, spoken in Southwestern Panama and Costa Rica, it
> clearly behaves as a marker of middle voice.
Hence, we are faced with a change on the conceptual layer only, whereas
the formal (expression) layer remains unchanged. In Indo-European,
however, the way seems to have been the other way round: Here, one
hypothesis is, that the formal layer showed gradual merger of two
distinct elements (morphemes) resulting in the blending of the two
conceptual layers. If we start from a very rudimentary paradigm (that
neglects many specifics and refers only to the singular forms), we can
describe the following for the Perfect/Stative:
1 *-H2e (~ *-a)
2 *-tH2e (~ *tha)
3 *-He (~ -e)
It seems reasonable to assume that these forms once represented
Dative-like variants of the 'agentive' series
1 *-m(-i)
2 *-s(-i)
3 *-t(-i)
Hence, *-m reads 'I (the doer)', *-s (you:SG (the doer), *-t ((s)he (the
doer)' or so, while *-H2e meant 'for me', *-tH2e 'for you:SG', and -He
'for him/her' or so (I use 'for' as a cover expression for the Dative
function). Now imagine we had a verb like *ghwen-m 'I hit'
(perfective/aorist). By adding the Dative clitic (?) *-H2e, the verb
would mean 'I hit for me' (*ghwen-m-H2e). As a result, a kind of middle
construction emerged that included both the agent marker and the
Dative-based subjectification marker. The two elements (historically
clitics?) then merged to one form resulting in the corresponding blend
of the agent/subjectification layers:
1 *-m-H2e (~ *-m-a)
2 *-s-tH2e (~ *-s-ta)
3 *-t-He (~ *-t-e)
The third person element perhaps was effected by ablaut resulting in
*-t-o. In a final step, the subjectification/reflexive paradigm became
harmonized based on the third person (as it is of the case with such
paradigms), hence generalizing *-e > -*-o. The final output would have
been the classical middle forms of the singular):
1 *-m-o (instead of *-m-a)
2 *-s-o (instead of *-s-ta)
3 *-t-o
For some more details see Wolfgang Schulze 1990. Prototypik in der
Diachronie. Zur Frage der indogermanischen Diathesen. In: FoliaLing.
Hist . X/1:1-19.
Best wishes,
Wolfgang
>
--
*Prof. Dr. Wolfgang
Schulze *
----------------------------------------------------------
/Primary contact:
/
Institut für Allgemeine & Typologische Sprachwissenschaft
Dept. II / F 13
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ludwigstraße 25
Postanschrift / Postal address: Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1
D-80539 München
Tel.: 0049-(0)89-2180-2486
(Secretary)
0049-(0)89-2180-5343
(Office)
Fax: 0049-(0)89-2180-16567 //
0049-(0)89-2180-5345
Email: W.Schulze at lrz.uni-muenchen.de
<mailto:W.Schulze at lrz.uni-muenchen.de> /// Wolfgang.Schulze at lmu.de
<mailto:Wolfgang.Schulze at lmu.de>
Web: http://www.ats.uni-muenchen.de/personen/professoren/schulze/index.html
http://www.wolfgangschulze.in-devir.com
----------------------------------------------------------
/Second
contact:
/
Katedra Germanistiký
Fakulta humanitných
vied
Univerzita Mateja Béla / Banská
Bystrica
Tajovského
40
SK-97401 Banská
Bystrica
Tel:
(00421)-(0)48-4465108
Fax: (00421)-(0)48-4465512
Email: Schulze at fhv.umb.sk
<mailto:Schulze at fhv.umb.sk>
Web: http://www.fhv.umb.sk/app/user.php?user=schulze
----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20091006/4b83848f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list