LT: Category Check
Wolfgang Schulze
W.Schulze at LRZ.UNI-MUENCHEN.DE
Tue Dec 18 17:29:03 UTC 2012
Dear all,
Matthew has touched upon a crucial point, I think. If we start from
model of//language being represented by/linguistic signs/ (others say:
constructions), we can posit a special type of such signs that is marked
for 'categorial /signifiés/' rather for conceptual /signifiés /in the
classical sense (this does not mean that categorial /signifiés /are not
conceptual, but the conceptual type differs from 'standard concepts'
from which they are often derived in terms of metonymic or in parts
metaphorical extension). The /signifiant/-domain that is structurally
coupled with such categorial /signifiés /(by convention or iconically)
maybe both articulatory or structural. Altogether, the resulting
/categorial sign/ may be related to a scientific /term /(label denoting
a 'linguistic category') /post rem/. Hence, linguistic categories are
/scientific artefacts/, whereas conceptual (cognitive) categories, that
is the /signifié /of the corresponding linguistic signs, are not. This
is the way I would handle the matter, without alluding to the question
whether categorial /signifiés /reflect (at least in parts) universal
properties of cognition or whether they are unique for a given language
system (which I doubt).
Best wishes,
Wolfgang
Am 18.12.2012 17:38, schrieb Matthew Dryer:
> Two points.
>
> First, Martin's suggestion of "term check" does not really apply to
> the second part of what Frans said: discussion of typologically
> unusual categories in particular languages is presumably discussion of
> the category itself, independent of what term we apply to it.
>
> Second, Frans' wording implies that categories can be polysemous or
> homonymous. But it is not categories that can be polysemous; it is
> terms for categories. This may seem like a quibble but I think that
> failure to distinguish categories from labels that we linguists might
> apply to such categories is often a source of confusion and
> misunderstanding.
>
> Matthew
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------
*Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulze *
----------------------------------------------------------
Institut für Allgemeine & Typologische Sprachwissenschaft
Dept. II / F 13
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ludwigstraße 25
D-80539 München
Tel.: 0049-(0)89-2180-2486 (Secretary)
0049-(0)89-2180-5343 (Office)
Fax: 0049-(0)89-2180-5345
Email: W.Schulze at lrz.uni-muenchen.de
<mailto:W.Schulze at lrz.uni-muenchen.de> /// Wolfgang.Schulze at lmu.de
<mailto:Wolfgang.Schulze at lmu.de>
Web: http://www.ats.lmu.de/index.html
Personal homepage: http://www.schulzewolfgang.de
----------------------------------------------------------
Diese e-Mail kann vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen enthalten. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind bzw.
diese e-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte umgehend
den Absender und vernichten Sie diese e-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren
sowie das unbefugte Verwenden und Weitergeben vertraulicher e-Mails oder
etwaiger, mit solchen e-Mails verbundener Anhänge im Ganzen oder in
Teilen ist nicht gestattet. Ferner wird die Haftung für jeglichen
Verlust oder Schaden, insbesondere durch virenbefallene e-Mails
ausgeschlossen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20121218/8768c204/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list