taboo against 3 people in picture: clarificartion
David Gil
gil at EVA.MPG.DE
Wed Feb 22 15:14:58 UTC 2012
While the various other taboos (not involving pictures) that have come
up are all interesting, what I am looking for is rather more specific:
• A taboo involving exactly three as opposed to fewer or more than three
— not a taboo involving three or more as opposed to two
• A taboo involving cardinal three as opposed to other cardinal numerals
— not a taboo involving the ordinal third as opposed to other ordinal
numerals
--
David Gil
Department of Linguistics
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
Telephone: 49-341-3550321 Fax: 49-341-3550119
Email: gil at eva.mpg.de
Webpage: http://www.eva.mpg.de/~gil/
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: David Gil <gil at eva.mpg.de>
Subject: query: taboo against 3 people in picture
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:14:20 +0900
Size: 2365
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20120223/e496e9b0/attachment.eml>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list