2nd Call for papers - SLE 2012 Workshop on DETACHMENT CONSTRUCTIONS AND TYPOLOGY...
M.M.Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest
m.m.jocelyne.fernandez-vest at VJF.CNRS.FR
Thu Jan 12 02:03:45 UTC 2012
*** WE APOLOGIZE FOR CROSS-POSTING ***
------------------------
Workshop on:
*Detachment constructions [dislocations] and typology *
*in languages of Europe and beyond*
45th Annual Meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE2012)
Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University
Stockholm (Sweden), 29 August-1 September 2012
http://www.societaslinguistica.eu <http://www.societaslinguistica.eu/>
http://sle2012.eu
*CONVENORS:*
M.M.Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest (Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique, LACITO & Université Paris 3 -- Sorbonne Nouvelle),
m.m.jocelyne.fernandez-vest at vjf.cnrs.fr
Ricardo Etxepare (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IKER,
UMR5478), r.etxepare at iker.cnrs.fr
*CALL FOR PAPERS - Important dates*
Abstracts should be submitted to SLE by *15 January 2012 *via the
conference site (http://www.sle2012.eu/), specifying that the abstract
is intended as an "Oral Presentation" in our workshop. The slots last 30
minutes (including discussion: 20+10).
Abstracts should be anonymous and contain between 400 and 500 words
(exclusive of references). They should state research questions,
approach, method, data and (expected) results.
Abstracts will receive three scores, two by two members of the SLE 2012
Scientific Committee and one by the workshop convenors. Notification of
acceptance will be given by *31 March 2012*.
*DESCRIPTION*
In spite of a varying terminology, one can notice in the recent studies
of Detachment constructions (previously called « dislocations ») a fair
amount of convergence, for instance through the priority given to
information criteria, referential accessibility, and cognitive relevance
(see Gundel & al. 2010, Lambrecht 2001, 2004). Detachments have been
mostly studied within the theoretical frame of Information Structuring
(IS), that was introduced in linguistics by the Prague School
functionalists and has been more systematically investigated in the last
few decades. The recent IS research has focused on two major topics: (i)
the notional foundations of IS theory (Vallduví 1992, Lambrecht 1994,
Erteschik-Shir 2007) ; (ii) the development of models of grammar which
account for the interaction between IS, syntax and semantics.
Multi-level integrated models of grammar have been proposed by
functionalists (Van Valin & LaPolla 1997), while generative studies have
integrated IS notions into the « cartographic » approach initiated by
Rizzi (1997).
The « left periphery » is the one which has given rise to most studies
(Barnes 1985, De Cat 2007, Sturgeon 2008). Mentioned already in the
1980s (Geluykens 1987, Lambrecht 1994, Dik 1997), the « right
periphery » has steadily been the cause for controversies (see Bernini &
Schwartz (eds.) 2006), but its independance towards the Theme/Topic is
confirmed by several new investigations (Fernandez-Vest 2004, Horlacher
& Müller 2005, Brunetti 2009a, 2009b, Amon 2009). The recognition of 2
types of Detachments has profited by the progresses of synchronic and
diachronic Detachment Linguistics in France (Apothéloz, Combettes &
Neveu (éds.), 2009).
In parallel with the traditional dichotomy (Theme-Rheme / Topic-Focus),
a tripartite analysis has developed, that meets the principle of a
triple organization of the utterance advocated by several language
theoreticians (Pierce, Danes(, Hagège). In a textual and interactional
perspective, the method of analysis can thus be based on twice 3
elements : 3 levels, pragmatic, morphosyntactic, semantic ; 3 pragmatic
constituents -- Theme -- Rheme -- Mneme ((/Tail/, /Antitopic/--, with 2
basic strategies available
. the /binary strategy 1/(Theme-Rheme), with a 1st element frequently
detached (Initial Detachment, ID)
. and the /binary strategy 2/(Rheme-Mneme), where the 2^nd constituent
is detached (Final Detachment, FD) ; it is a typical construction for
Impromptu Speech, mostly absent in written style.
A Minimal Communicative Utterance (MCU) is in this perspective shaped by
the Rheme, often a short Answer, morphosyntactically variable
(Fernandez-Vest 2009, 2011). In Europe, the study of Romance languages
in particular has enriched the knowledge of IS and its privileged means
of expression : prosody, discourse particles, word order. IS is no
longer considered an exclusive matter of syntax : in the Informational
Patterning theory, prosodic parsing is seen as an index of formal
recognition of IS (Scarano 2009). Diachronic studies of « non standard
French » have shown that IDs and FDs, even though a very old syntactic
phenomenon which can be interpreted differently by enunciation
theoreticians vs. syntacticians, require basically to take into account
the prosody as well as the discourse co- and context (Blanche-Benveniste
2010).
Another important contribution is made by the Non-Indo-European
languages of Europe, which through their constant contacts belong to the
European semantic sphere, but typologically are still rather different
from their neighbors : Detachments have been studied in Finno-Ugric
languages (Samic and Finnic) from the points of view of their
typological evolution from oral to written language as well as from the
internal contrastivity of spoken vs. written enunciation (Fernandez-Vest
2006). The 2 types of Detachments have been integrated in the
« Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish » published by the Finnish Academy of
Science (ISK 2004). Detachments in Basque have been studied mostly on
the formal/generative model, with a particular recent attention to
so-called « interface interactions » between prosody and information
structure (Elordieta and Irurtzun 2009), but other discourse structure
oriented studies exist (Osa 1990). Taking into account the existence of
possibly different focus positions and of multiple focus constructions
(Etxepare & Uribe-Etxebarria 2008), two broad lines of analysis have
been applied to Basque Theme-Rheme constructions in syntactic theory:
(i) focus is an interface phenomenon, whose syntactic distribution
follows from comparison between representations pertaining to different
modules of the linguistic faculty (Arregi 2003) ; (ii) focus
constructions are operator constructions targeting a given syntactic
position in the clause structure (« syntactocentric » or derivational
analysis, Irurtzun 2007).
Exploring the interaction of IS, semantic and syntactic structures (Van
Valin 2005), larger cross-linguistic studies have begun giving results
about the main processes involved in IS in typologically different
languages -- see the Project /ISTY 1/(/Information Structuring and
Typology ://Detachment constructions in Languages and Discourses,
/CNRS-Fédération TUL, Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques)
http://www.typologie.cnrs.fr/spip.php?rubrique48
http://lacito.vjf.cnrs.fr/colloque/focus_rheme/index.htm
*Possible topics for the workshop INCLUDE **: *
(a) Detachments and external contrastivity (typological descriptions ;
cross-linguistic studies)
(b) Detachments and internal contrastivity (oral vs. written register ;
types of utterances ; types of discourse situations)
(c) Detachments and other devices of spoken language (discourse
particles, prosody)
(d) Detachment, IS and discourse genres
(e) Detachments in transfer (oral interpretation, translation of fiction
dialogues)
(f) Detachments in an evolutionary perspective
*References***:
Amon Marri, 2009, « Les détachements finaux en estonien oral :
productivité et fonctionnement », in M.M.J. Fernandez-Vest & D.T.
Do-Hurinville (dir/./), /Plurilinguisme et traduction, des enjeux pour
l'Europe -- Multilingualism and translation, challenges for Europe/,
Paris, L'Harmattan, coll. Grammaire & Cognition, 6, 151-164.
Apothéloz Denis, Combettes Bernard & Neveu Franck (éds.), 2009, /Les
linguistiques du détachement, Actes du Colloque International//de Nancy
(7-9 juin 2006)/, Bern-Berlin..., Peter Lang, coll. Sciences pour la
communication, 87, 595 p.
Arregi Karlos, 2003, /Focus on Basque Movements/. Doctoral dissertation,
MIT.
BarnesB.K., 1985, /The pragmatics of left detachment in Standard//spoken
French/, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, Pragmatics & Beyond VI:3.
Bernini G. and Schwartz M. L. (eds.), 2006, /Pragmatic organization in
languages of Europe/, Berlin-New York, Mouton de Gruyter, Empirical
approaches to language typology, Eurotyp 20-8.
Blanche-Benveniste Claire, 2010, /Le//français. Usages de la langue
parlée/. Avec la collaboration de Philippe Martin pour l'étude de la
prosodie, Leuven-Paris, Peeters, Les langues du Monde, 3, 240 p.
Brunetti Lisa, 2009a, « On the pragmatics of post-focal material in
Italian (left peripheral focus looked at from the other side) », in D.
Apothéloz, B. Combettes & F. Neveu (éds.), 2009, /Les linguistiques du
détachement..., /151-161.
Brunetti Lisa, 2009b, On links and tails in Italian, /Lingua/, 119, 5,
756-81.
De Cat Cécile, 2007,/French dislocation. Interpretation, syntax,
acquisition/, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Dik Simon C., 1997, /The theory of Functional grammar, Part 2 : Complex
and derived constructions/, Berlin, De Gruyter.
Elordieta Gorka and Aritz Irurtzun, 2009, « The prosody and
interpretation of non-exhaustive narrow focus in Basque »,
/ASJU/XLIII:1-2, 205-230.
Erteschik-ShirNomi, 2007, /Information structure. The syntax-discourse
interface/. Oxford surveys in syntax and morphology. Oxford, Oxford
University Press.
Etxepare Ricardo & Ortiz de Urbina J., 2003, « Focalization », in J.I.
Hualde and J. Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), /A Grammar of Basque/, Berlin,
Mouton, 459-515.
Etxepare Ricardo and Uribe-Etxebarria M., 2008, « Negation and focus in
Basque », in X. Artiagoitia, and J. Lakarra (eds), /A Festschrift for
Patxi Goenaga/, Supplements of the /International Journal of Basque
Language and Linguistics/, 51, Bilbao, University of the Basque Country,
287-310.
Fernandez-Vest M.M.Jocelyne, 2004, « Mnémème, Antitopic : Le post-Rhème,
de l'énoncé au texte », in M.M.J. Fernandez-Vest & Sh. Carter-Thomas
(éds.), /Structure Informationnelle et Particules Enonciatives, /65-104.
Fernandez-Vest M.M.Jocelyne, 2009, « Vers une typologie informationnelle
des constructions à détachement », in D. Apothéloz, B. Combettes & F.
Neveu (éds.), 2009, /Les linguistiques du détachement.../, 251-262.
Fernandez-Vest M.M.Jocelyne, 2011, « Detachment constructions as
fundaments of Information Structuring -- evidence from French, Finnic,
Samic, » paper presented at the International Workshop /Information
Structure and Spoken language. Cross-linguistic studies/, July 9-10,
2011, LSA Linguistic Institute, Boulder,
Colorado.wwwhttp://infostructuring.wikidot.com/
Fernandez-Vest M.M.Jocelyne & Carter-Thomas Shirley (éds.), 2004,
/Structure Informationnelle et Particules Enonciatives -- essai de
typologie/, Paris, Ed. L'Harmattan, coll. Grammaire & Cognition, Nos
1-2, 360 p.
Geluykens R., 1987, « Tails [Right Dislocations] as a repair mechanism
in English conversations », in J. Nuyts et G. de Schutter (éds),
/Getting one's Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar,
/Dordrecht, Foris Publications, 119-130.
Gundel J.K. & Bassene Mamadou & Gordon Bryan & Hummick Linda & Khalfaoui
Amel, 2010, Testing predictions of the Givenness Hierarchy framework : A
cross-linguistic investigation, /Journal of Pragmatics/, 42, 1770-1785.
Hagège Claude, 1978, Du thème au thème en passant par le sujet : pour
une théorie cyclique, /La linguistique/, 14/2, p. 3-38.
Horlacher A-S. & Müller G.M., 2005, « L'implication de la dislocation à
droite dans l'organisation interactionnelle », in S. Pekarek Doehler &
M-J. Béguelin (éds.), Numéro spécial de /TRANEL/, /Grammaire, discours,
interaction. La structuration de l'information./
Irurtzun Aritz, 2007, /The Grammar of focus at the interfaces/. Doctoral
dissertation, University of the Basque Country.
ISK = /Iso//suomen kielioppi/[A Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish], 2004,
A. Hakulinen & M. Vilkuna & R. Korhonen & V. Koivisto & T-R. Heinonen &
I. Alho, Helsinki, SKS.
Lambrecht Knud, 1994, /Information structure and sentence form. Topic,
focus and the mental representations of discourse referents, /Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht Knud, 2001, Chap. 80. « Dislocation », in M. Haspelmath, E.
König, W. Oesterreicher, Wulf & W. Raible (eds.), /Language typology and
language universals. Sprachtypologie und Sprachliche Universalien.
Typologie des langues et universaux linguistiques. An international
handook/, Berlin-New-York, Walter de Gruyter, vol. 2, 1050-1078.
Lambrecht Knud, 2004, « Un système pour l'analyse de la structure
informationnelle des phrases. L'exemple des constructions clivées », in
M.M.J. Fernandez-Vest & Sh. Carter-Thomas (eds.), /Structure
Informationnelle et Particules Enonciatives.../, 21-61.
Mereu Lunella (ed.), 2009, /Information structure and its interfaces/,
Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, Interface explorations, 19. Introduction, 1-11.
Osa Eusebio, 1990, /Euskararen hitzordena komunikazio zereginaren
arabera/[The Word order of Basque according to its communicative
function], University of the Basque Country.
Rizzi Luigi, 1997, « The fine structure of the left periphery », in L.
Hagerman (ed.), /Elements of grammar/, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 281-337.
Scarano Antonietta, 2009, « The prosodic annotation of C-ORAL-ROM and
the structure of information in spoken language », in Mereu (ed.), 51-74.
Vallduví Enric, 1992, /The informational component/, New York, Garland.
Van Valin Robert Jr. & LaPolla Randy, 1997, /Syntax : structure, meaning
and function/, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin Robert Jr., 2005, /Exploring the syntax-semantics interface/,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
*
--
M.M.Jocelyne FERNANDEZ-VEST
Directrice de Recherche au C.N.R.S.
Linguistique G?n?rale, Ouralienne et Nordique
CNRS-LACITO UMR 7107, Universit?s Paris 3& Paris 4
29, rue Descartes. F-75005 PARIS
T?l.& Fax : 33.(0)1.43.25.08.46
http://lacito.vjf.cnrs.fr/membres/fernandez.htm
http://mmj-fernandez-vest.wikidot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20120112/0e223e6a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list