[Lingtyp] wordhood: responses to Haspelmath

[Adam J Tallman]

I am writing a paper about wordhood - has anyone responded to Haspelmath's
2011 *Folia Linguistica* paper on the topic?

I have only found two sources that mention the paper and seem to put
forward an argument against its conclusions, but its mostly in *en passant *
fashion.

On is Blevins (2016) *Word and Paradigm Morphology *and another is Geertzen,
Jeroen, James P. Blevins & Petar Milin. ‘Informativeness of unit
boundaries’ [pdf
<http://people.ds.cam.ac.uk/jpb39/pdf/GeertzenBlevinsMilin2016.pdf>]. Italian
Journal of Linguistics *28*(2), 1–24.

Any correspondence in this regard would be greatly appreciated,

Adam

-- 
Adam J.R. Tallman
Investigador del Museo de Etnografía y Folklore, la Paz
PhD candidate, University of Texas at Austin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20171109/d1c741e4/attachment.htm>