[Lingtyp] ALT: code of conduct

Tue Nov 21 21:12:27 UTC 2017

Dear Andrew, dear all,

This is what I read in your e-mail (my emphasis):

"Clarity in this area, and an expressed position along the lines of the
excellent ACL policy circulated by Emily Bender, *would probably also help
draw people into ALT who are currently on the outside and (in some cases, I
think) find themselves discouraged by some of the tenor of the current
conversation*."

English is obviously not my mother tongue, hence I might be misinterpreting
your words, but what I understand is: there are people who would join
(/participate in) ALT, but who are currently discouraged to do so by the
fact that we are discussing the merits and demerits of a proposed Code of
Conduct.

If this is what you meant, I have to admit that, honestly, this is
incomprehensible to me. Should we refrain from discussing in an open forum
because otherwise people who are probably not even in this mailing list
might feel intimidated? Above all, are there really cases of people who
stay away from ALT because ALT does not have a code of conduct?

On the other hand, I do agree that the ACL policy circulated by Emily
Bender sounds much more reasonable than the original ALT proposal. As
Sebastian Nordhoff cleverly pointed out, its purpose is clear and its scope
is adequately defined, in my view. The ACL policy 1. discourages harassing
etc.; 2. provides a fairly sensible procedure (i.e. how to deal with cases
of *alleged* harassment), without assuming guilt.

Lastly, I still haven't read a reply to David Gil's very clever and
thought-provoking challenge: how about the 'Padang incident'? Or is that
one fine, because it fits in our (Anglophone) Western conception of what is
acceptable and what is not?

Best,

Giorgio F. Arcodia

2017-11-21 17:22 GMT+01:00 Andrew Garrett <garrett at berkeley.edu>:

> Hi all -
>
> Please forgive what may seem like an intrusion from a linguist who happens
> to be on the ALT email list but is not an ALT member. From my perspective
> (within a US linguistics department), it seems very important that
> institutions and organizations provide clear statements regarding
> harassment. Bullying and harassment, ranging on a spectrum from
> intellectual bullying to sexual harassment (not to mention assault), are
> constant problems in our public and academic life, and are all too easy to
> minimize if we simply leave it up to our collective and individual
> goodwill. Most scholars and scientists do have goodwill, but it is
> incredibly easy for us to turn a blind eye to the problem of harassment,
> and thereby disempower, devalue, and exclude the voices of those who
> experience it, if we do not experience it ourselves.
>
> Clarity in this area, and an expressed position along the lines of the
> excellent ACL policy circulated by Emily Bender, would probably also help
> draw people into ALT who are currently on the outside and (in some cases, I
> think) find themselves discouraged by some of the tenor of the current
> conversation.
>
> Thank you for your discussions of this important subject. I wish all
> professional societies were as engaged as ALT.
>
> - Andrew Garrett
>
>
>
> Andrew Garrett
> Professor and Chair, Department of Linguistics
> Nadine M. Tang and Bruce L. Smith Professor of Cross-Cultural Social Sciences
> Director, Survey of California and Other Indian Languages
> 1203 Dwinelle Hall #2650
> University of California
> Berkeley CA 94720-2650
>
> email: garrett at berkeley.edu
> web: http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~garrett
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Emily M. Bender <ebender at uw.edu> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In case it is helpful for this discussion, here is a link to the
>> anti-harassment policy recently adopted by the Association for
>> Computational Linguistics, another international scholarly organization:
>>
>> https://aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=Anti-Harassment_Policy
>>
>> We (the ACL exec) are presently in the process of developing procedures
>> to follow in case of  complaints raised under the policy.  These cases are
>> never easy, and of course none of this is pleasant to think about.
>> However, it is clear that despite the fact that most people attend academic
>> conferences in good faith and without wishing to make the atmosphere
>> unwelcoming to anyone, cases of harassment do occur, and that therefore the
>> status quo is unacceptable.  Furthermore, it is a helpful, positive thing
>> for professional organizations to set expectations.  That expectation
>> setting in and of itself can help underrepresented groups feel more welcome
>> and supported (and more likely to stick around in the field).  The "worst
>> case" consequences in policies such as this are there to give them teeth,
>> but are never automatic consequences of a complaint being raised.
>>
>> Emily
>>
>> p.s. Here's the text of the ACL policy:
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Anti-Harassment Policy
>> The open exchange of ideas, the freedom of thought and expression, and
>> respectful scientific debate are central to the aims and goals of the ACL.
>> These require a community and an environment that recognizes the inherent
>> worth of every person and group, that fosters dignity, understanding, and
>> mutual respect, and that embraces diversity. For these reasons, ACL is
>> dedicated to providing a harassment-free experience for all the members, as
>> well as participants at our events and in our programs.
>>
>> Harassment and hostile behavior are unwelcome at any ACL conference,
>> associated event, or in ACL-affiliated on-line discussions. This includes:
>> speech or behavior that intimidates, creates discomfort, or interferes with
>> a person's participation or opportunity for participation in a conference
>> or an event. We aim for ACL-related activities to be an environment where
>> harassment in any form does not happen, including but not limited to:
>> harassment based on race, gender, religion, age, color, appearance,
>> national origin, ancestry, disability, sexual orientation, or gender
>> identity. Harassment includes degrading verbal comments, deliberate
>> intimidation, stalking, harassing photography or recording, inappropriate
>> physical contact, and unwelcome sexual attention. The policy is not
>> intended to inhibit challenging scientific debate, but rather to promote it
>> through ensuring that all are welcome to participate in shared spirit of
>> scientific inquiry.
>>
>> It is the responsibility of the community as a whole to promote an
>> inclusive and positive environment for our scholarly activities. In
>> addition, anyone who experiences harassment or hostile behavior may contact
>> any current member of the ACL Executive Committee ([1]) or contact
>> Priscilla Rasmussen (acl at aclweb.org), who is usually available at the
>> registration desk during ACL conferences. Members of the executive
>> committee will be instructed to keep any such contact in strict confidence,
>> and those who approach the committee will be consulted before any actions
>> are taken.
>>
>> Implementation
>> This policy should be posted prominently on all ACL conference and
>> workshop webpages, with a notice of a list of people who can be contacted
>> by community members with concerns. In case of a formal complaint, the
>> contacted ACL representative(s) will first speak to all parties involved to
>> try to resolve the issue without presupposition of guilt.
>>
>> Approved by ACL Executive Committee, 2016
>>
>> ===
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Good, Jeff <jcgood at buffalo.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> In light of the ongoing debate about the proposed code of conduct, I
>>> would like to send a brief message on behalf of the ALT Executive Committee.
>>>
>>> The ALT Executive Committee recognizes the importance of allowing open
>>> debates on topics of relevance to the association and encourages members
>>> with an opinion on the proposed code of conduct to voice their views
>>> publicly on as they see fit. Regardless of the outcome of the vote, we
>>> welcome further discussion of this topic at the upcoming biennial meeting.
>>>
>>> We also encourage members to vote on the code (whether for or against)
>>> as presently proposed, and we do not plan to propose a revised code before
>>> the biennial meeting. Based on the discussion at the meeting, a revision to
>>> the code can be developed if the present code is passed or a new code can
>>> be proposed if the present proposal does not pass.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jeff Good
>>> President, Association for Linguistic Typology
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lingtyp mailing list
>>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
>>> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Emily M. Bender
>> Professor, Department of Linguistics
>> Check out CLMS on facebook! http://www.facebook.com/uwclma
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing list
>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
>> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
>

-- 
Prof. Dr. Giorgio Francesco Arcodia
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Dipartimento di Scienze Umane per la Formazione
Edificio U6 - stanza 4101
Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1
20126 Milano

Tel.: (+39) 02 6448 4946(+39) 02 6448 4946
Fax: (+39) 02 6448 4863
E-mail: giorgio.arcodia at unimib.it
Website: http://www.bilgroup.it/it/info/giorgio-francesco-arcodia/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/bicoccalanguage
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20171121/1e11001c/attachment.htm>