[Lingtyp] Do experimental and typological studies predict each other?

Claire Bowern clairebowern at gmail.com
Mon Jan 15 12:46:39 UTC 2018


For some information about this in an Australian context, see Haynie,
Bowern, and LaPalombara (2014):
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092852..
We found some support but not in every language we looked at.
Claire

On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 7:04 AM, JOO Ian <il.y.en.a at outlook.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Many experimental studies show that people tend to associate high front
> vowels with small size and low back vowels with large size (*e. g.*
> Shinohara and Kawahara 2010).
>
> Bauer’s (1996) study, on the other hand, show that diminutive and
> augmentative affixes are not correlated with specific vowels, contrary to
> what one would expect based on experimental studies.
>
> This leads me to think that experimental and typological studies do not
> always predict each other. That is, the correlations demonstrated by
> experiments are not necessarily statistically visible in natural languages,
> what is statistically significant in natural languages may not be
> demonstrable through experiments.
>
> What do you think about the predictability between experimental and
> typological studies? Can you think of any example where there is no
> predictability, like the case of Bauer (1996)?
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ian Joo
>
> http://ianjoo.academia.edu
>
>
>
> *References*
>
> Bauer, Laurie. “No Phonetic Iconicity in Evaluative Morphology.” *Studia
> Linguistica*, vol. 50, no. 2, 1996, pp. 189–206.
>
> Shinohara, Kazuko, and Shigeto Kawahara. “A Cross-Linguistic Study of
> Sound Symbolism: The Images of Size.” *Annual Meeting of the Berkeley
> Linguistics Society*, vol. 36, 2010, pp. 396–410.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20180115/13a6e46b/attachment.htm>


More information about the Lingtyp mailing list