[Lingtyp] Perlative and instrumental

Tatiana Nikitina tavnik at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 18:53:42 UTC 2018

Hi Juergen,

The competition between bare instrumentals and path PPs in Russian is
discussed in this paper, based on corpus data:

Philippova, Natalia. 2017. Prepositional phrase vs. bare instrumental.
In S. Luraghi, T. Nikitina & C. Zanchi (eds.) Space in Diachrony. John
Benjamins, 347-68.

There seem to be a whole range of factors involved in this variation.

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:39 PM Bohnemeyer, Juergen <jb77 at buffalo.edu> wrote:
> Dear all — Another question concerning motion coding, this one on behalf of an advisee of mine:
> It seems clear that perlatives are a source of instrumental expressions (broadly speaking, although it seems that European languages generally tend to extend comitatives to tools, which one might suspect are the prototypical instruments). The poster child for this might be the oblique agent prepositions _par_ in French and _por_ in Spanish, which seem to be descendants of Latin perlative _per_ (while Classical Latin used ablative case for instrumental functions such as oblique agents). Similarly, in German, perlative _durch_ ’through' is extended to oblique forces, non-intentional agents, and event nominalizations in the same oblique causer role. Dutch goes one step further and applies to cognate _door_ to all oblique causers including agents. English _by_ is a route path preposition, so its meaning falls in the perlative domain. And so on.
> Now, having said all this, it seems that Russian shows some evidence of the inverse direction of semantic transfer, by using bare instrumental case for route path coding. Please see the examples below, courtesy of Anastasia Stepanova, the doctoral candidate exploring these issues:
> (1) Floyd arrived by the river - a) Флойд добрался рекой b) Флойд прибыл по реке
> (2) The train passed through the tunnel. - a) Поезд проехал тоннелем b) Поезд проехал через тоннель
> (3) The bird flew over the mountains. - a) Птица прилетела горами b) Птица пролетела над горами
> (4) The dog ran across the field. - a) Собака (при)бежала полем b) Собака (при)бежала через поле
> (5) Sally came through the bridge. - a) Салли пришла мостом b) Салли прошла через мост
> As you can see, in all cases, there are alternative expressions involving a perlative preposition governing accusative, instrumental, or ‘prepositional’ (i.e., more or less, locative) case.
> The bare instrumental uses seem mildly surprising from a cognitive perspective at first sight, given that the instrumental is a fairly abstract case.
> Our hypothesis is that the choice between the two strategies depends on information perspective: prepositional coding is used as more of a default, and generally provides more information about the path. Bare instrumental coding is used if the path is discourse-pragmatically in focus, i.e., in response to a question under discussion as to which of a number of alternative possible routes, all of which are treated as known, is the one the figure takes.
> We’d be grateful for any pointers to discussions of this phenomenon in Russian and similar phenomena in other languages.
> Best — Juergen
> --
> Juergen Bohnemeyer, Professor and Director of Graduate Studies
> Department of Linguistics and Center for Cognitive Science
> University at Buffalo
> Office: 642 Baldy Hall, UB North Campus * Mailing address: 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
> Phone: (716) 645 0127
> Fax: (716) 645 3825 * Email: jb77 at buffalo.edu * Web: http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/
> Office hours Mo 3:30-4:30 / F 2:00-3:00
> There’s A Crack In Everything - That’s How The Light Gets In (Leonard Cohen)
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp

More information about the Lingtyp mailing list