[Lingtyp] Topic and focus markers with other functions

Fri Aug 2 02:31:09 UTC 2019

Greetings:

The focus marker is also the copula or a  development from it in Nama, a Papuan language of Southern New Guinea, and other languages in the Yam family.

Regards,
Jeff Siegel

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Message: 1
    Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 08:03:08 +0000
    From: Patrick McConvell <patrick.mcconvell at anu.edu.au>
    To: Kilu von Prince <kilu.von.prince at hu-berlin.de>, Frederick J
    	Newmeyer <fjn at uw.edu>
    Cc: "<LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG>"
    	<LINGTYP at listserv.linguistlist.org>
    Subject: Re: [Lingtyp] Topic and focus markers with other functions
    Message-ID:
    	<SYXPR01MB18563B5ECCCCD780FDAD50CBC7DE0 at SYXPR01MB1856.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>

    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

    There are quite a lot of languages in which the focus marker is the copula or a  development from it. I wrote about this in Hausa in my Ph.D thesis long ago:

    1973 Ph.D. awarded by SOAS, University of London, for thesis

    Cleft sentences in Hausa? A syntactic study of focus

    Pat McConvell

    ________________________________
    From: Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of Kilu von Prince <kilu.von.prince at hu-berlin.de>
    Sent: Thursday, 1 August 2019 5:23 PM
    To: Frederick J Newmeyer <fjn at uw.edu>
    Cc: <LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG> <LINGTYP at listserv.linguistlist.org>
    Subject: Re: [Lingtyp] Topic and focus markers with other functions

    Hi Frederick,

    the Chinese copula is an obvious candidate. I'm shamelessly self-promoting the article I wrote about its semantics in both functions, see attached.

    All the best,
    Kilu

    On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:09 AM Frederick J Newmeyer <fjn at uw.edu<mailto:fjn at uw.edu>> wrote:

    Dear Lingtyp,

    I am looking for examples where topic markers or focus markers in some language are clearly members of some broad morphosyntactic category.

    Let me give an example involving negatives of the sort of thing that I am looking for. Negative elements in various languages are often members of a broader category: in Estonian negative particles are auxiliaries, in Tongan they are complement-taking verbs, in English they are adverbs, and so on.

    So what I am looking for are parallel examples with topic and focus markers: cases where a reasonable analysis would assign them to some broader category.

    Thanks,

    Fritz

    Frederick J. Newmeyer
    Professor Emeritus, University of Washington
    Adjunct Professor, U of British Columbia and Simon Fraser U
    _______________________________________________
    Lingtyp mailing list
    Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org<mailto:Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
    http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp

    --
    Dr. Kilu von Prince

    http://kiluvonprince.de/
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
    Dorotheenstraße 24
    Raum 3.410
    10099 Berlin
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20190801/8cc4d43a/attachment-0001.html>

    ------------------------------

    Message: 2
    Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:16:31 +0200
    From: Isabelle BRIL <isabelle.bril at cnrs.fr>
    To: <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
    Subject: Re: [Lingtyp] Topic and focus markers with other functions
    Message-ID: <dfe0d902-1352-1f54-9119-0e18a82bb320 at cnrs.fr>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

    Hi

    There are many cases of coordinators (sequential, additive, 
    constrastive, disjunctive), of demonstratives as well as some 
    case-markers used as topic and focus markers in a number of 
    Austronesian-Oceanic languages.

    The attached article analyses such cases.

    2010, Bril I., “Informational and referential hierarchy: clause-linking 
    strategies in Austronesian-Oceanic languages”. In Bril 
    (ed.)./Clause-linking and clause hierarchy: syntax and pragmatics/. 
    Amsterdam: Benjamins. 269-311.

    This article is part of the following volume :
    2010,Bril I. (éd.), /Clause-linking and clause hierarchy: syntax and 
    pragmatics./ [Studies in Language Companion Series 121]. Benjamins

    in which other such cases are analysed in other language families, for 
    instance,

    Frajzyngier in Wandala (Central Chadic) (Chapter 9),
    Vanhove in Yafi‘ Arabic (Yemen) (involving demonstratives and perception 
    verbs) (Chapter 10),
    Taine-Cheikh (Chapter 11) in Zenaga (Berber) .

    TAM markers are another possible source analysed by:

    Verstraete in Umpithamu (Paman language, Australia), Chapter 14
    Robert in Wolof (Niger-Congo, Senegal) (Chapter 15)
    François in Hiw and Lo-Toga (Oceanic, Vanuatu),Chapter 16) .

    Hope this helps.

    Best
    Isabelle Bril

    Le 01/08/2019 à 01:08, Frederick J Newmeyer a écrit :
    >
    > Dear Lingtyp,
    >
    > I am looking for examples where topic markers or focus markers in some 
    > language are clearly members of some broad morphosyntactic category.
    >
    > Let me give an example involving negatives of the sort of thing that I 
    > am looking for. Negative elements in various languages are often 
    > members of a broader category: in Estonian negative particles are 
    > auxiliaries, in Tongan they are complement-taking verbs, in English 
    > they are adverbs, and so on.
    >
    > So what I am looking for are parallel examples with topic and focus 
    > markers: cases where a reasonable analysis would assign them to some 
    > broader category.
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Fritz
    >
    >
    > Frederick J. Newmeyer
    > Professor Emeritus, University of Washington
    > Adjunct Professor, U of British Columbia and Simon Fraser U
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Lingtyp mailing list
    > Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
    > http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp

    -- 
    Isabelle Bril
    Directeur de recherches (LACITO-CNRS)
    Directeur d'Etudes à l'EPHE (Typologie et Typologie des langues austronésiennes)

    Ecole de typologie ESSLT 2016
    https://typoling2016.sciencesconf.org/
    http://www.typologie.cnrs.fr/

    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20190801/71187a90/attachment.html>
    -------------- next part --------------
    A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    Name: Bril_Inform_refer_hierar_Austron_Benjamins.pdf
    Type: application/pdf
    Size: 487071 bytes
    Desc: not available
    URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20190801/71187a90/attachment.pdf>

    ------------------------------

    Subject: Digest Footer

    _______________________________________________
    Lingtyp mailing list
    Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
    http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp

    ------------------------------

    End of Lingtyp Digest, Vol 59, Issue 2
    **************************************