[Lingtyp] New name for "Mainland Northeast Asia"

[Dan I. SLOBIN]

Statistical analyses are useful, but they are evaluated on the basis of
probabilities, assuming that all features are independent.
But, of course, they are not.  Features can be abstracted from records of
texts and language recordings because they are reflections
of mouths and ears and eyes and minds--that is, language use.  There are
masses of studies by psycho- and sociolinguists and
functional and cognitive linguists pointing to many motivations for
cooccurrences of linguistic features.  So in addition to bare
statistical probabilities, we can--cautiously--evaluate patterns in terms
of plausibility and coherence in terms of what we know
about how language is produced, received, and processed.

Dan Slobin

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:27 AM JOO, Ian [Student] <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> motivated Martin’s comment regarding how many people were misled by
> randomly distributed features, I designed an R script that randomly assigns
> (binary) values of 50 features to 34 sample languages.
> For details, please have a look at the attached R script. Here I’ll just
> show you one result of running the script. The “Center” column refers to a
> language that would be the center of a (hypothetical) area. And the
> “Similarity” column shows you the average number of features shared between
> the center language and the languages in the vicinity of the center
> language.
>
>
> For example here, it shows that the languages that are close to Korean, on
> average, share about 30 out of 50 features with Korean, which is the
> highest degree of similarity within the sample. Of course, this is when the
> chance of having any feature is 50%.
> So, when you randomly assign 50 features (each of them having 50%
> probability) to 34 languages, a few languages will have around 60%
> similarity with neighboring languages. One could think that such clusters
> are valid areas, when in fact they are just random results.
> I guess the take-home message is: with some adequate visualization exposed
> to the naked eye, one could easily believe that a random cluster is a valid
> area. So some kind of “objective” threshold is needed to argue for the
> existence of an area. I guess I could do that by setting the threshold
> above the statistically significant level.
>
> Regards.
> Ian
> On 4 Jan 2021, 11:45 PM +0800, Martin Haspelmath <
> martin_haspelmath at eva.mpg.de>, wrote:
>
> It seems that the problem of identifying areal phenomena in an objective
> way is a really hard one. It is indeed very easy to be misled by
> appearances.
>
> I remember a talk by Östen Dahl around 2003 when he presented a WALS-like
> map with two feature values and asked the audience to look for areal
> patterns – of which there was no shortage (low-level ones). Then came the
> surprise: The map that he presented was generated by a random process.
>
> Back in 1998/2001, I identified a number of "Standard Average European
> <https://zenodo.org/record/1236769>" areal features, but I didn't try to
> make sure that these were not random coincidences. Out of thousands of
> possible areal features, 12-15 that cluster in Europe is perhaps not all
> that much. It seems that we would need to start in a radically bottom-up
> manner, using a representative set of features, and examine them all for a
> large number of languages. (Ian Joo seems to be planning something of this
> sort.)
>
> But what is a "representative set of grammatical features"? Nobody seems
> to have an idea of how to achieve objective representativeness.
>
> The only quantitative approach to the problem that I have come across is
> this paper:
>
> Daumé III, Hal. 2009. Non-Parametric Bayesian Areal Linguistics. *arXiv:0906.5114
> [cs]*. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.5114)
>
> Best wishes, and Happy New Year,
> Martin
>
> Am 04.01.21 um 16:07 schrieb JOO, Ian [Student]:
>
> Dear all,
>
> first, I apologize if I’m spamming everyone with my personal research. But
> this is just a response to some of those who have provided me helpful
> feedback.
> As some have rightfully pointed out the problems of my top-down approach,
> I decided to take their advice and radically change the direction of my
> research into a bottom-up approach. In other words, other than
> hypothesizing that there is a linguistic area called
> Mainland/Inner/Central/whatever Northeast Asia and then looking for
> features that would justify that area, I decided to agnostically collect
> linguistic features from the sample languages of a macroarea and then use
> that data to see if there are any subareas within that macroarea. And that
> macroarea will be East Asia (not including North Asia or Southeast Aisa). I
> have selected 34 convenience sample languages spoken in East Asia (see
> below). (Note that some language names are simplified for visual
> convenience, for example just “Hmong” for Dananshan Hmong.)
>
> <>
>
> So the idea is to first gather, say, 50-100 linguistic features, test
> whether each language has that feature, and then use that data to see if
> certain feature is dominant in certain geographical zones within East Asia
> (for example Northwest China). Only after that would it be safe to claim a
> linguistic area.
> I would like to express my gratitude to all the helpful feedback that
> drastically changed the direction of my future research. Also I would
> appreciate it if you could have a look at the sample languages above to see
> if I should add any sample languages to balance the geography or geneology
> of the sample.
>
> Regards,
> Ian
> On 4 Jan 2021, 7:47 PM +0800, JOO, Ian [Student]
> <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk> <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk>, wrote:
>
> Dear Andi,
>
> Vladimir Panov in his recent paper "Final particles in Asia: Establishing
> an areal feature <https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-2032>” discusses
> the definition of an areal feature.
> His idea is that even if a given feature found not only in a given area
> but in other parts of the world as well, that doesn’t necessarily rule out
> that that feature is not areal. If that feature is not found in areas
> surrounding that area, then that qualifies as an areal feature too.
> I would like to take an example from Mainland Southeast Asia: Tones. Of
> course, tones are not unique to Mainland Southeast Asia. It’s even
> prevalent in its neighboring regions like Northeast Asia. But no one would
> deny that tones are a linguistic feature of MSEA precisely because it’s
> uncommon in areas surrounding it (insular Southeast Asia and South Asia).
> Thus we cannot say that “because tones are common in other parts of the
> world, it can’t be an areal feature of MSEA.” Sure, it can’t be a *unique* feature
> of MSEA, but it’s its areal feature nevertheless. This is how I view
> areality.
> You’re right about the methodological issue that the bottom-up approach
> would be good as well. But for the moment I would like to try a top-down
> methodology. And thanks for the reading suggestions!
>
> Regards,
> Ian
> On 4 Jan 2021, 7:33 PM +0800, hoelzlandreas at web.de <hoelzlandreas at web.de>
> <hoelzlandreas at web.de>, wrote:
>
> Dear Ian,
>
> A more salient feature of the area, such as a geographical name, would
> perhaps be more convincing than the name of a plant.
>
> Concerning the features you listed:
>
> > The colexification between NORTH and REAR (as previously discussed);
>
> This is indeed interesting. The same can be found in Oroqen
> (Tungusic), etc. I am not sure how old this feature is, but it cannot be
> found in varieties of Jurchen, the predecessor or close relative of Manchu
> which you had on your map.
>
> The other features you listed do not seem to define any area in Northeast
> Asia but can be found throughout Eurasia or the world. I would advice
> having another look at the typological literature (e.g., on differential
> object marking), literature on "Altaic/Transeurasian" (Martine Robbeets has
> a paper on passive/causative isomorphism), and the features in WALS
> (e.g., Holger Diessel's map on demonstratives:
> https://wals.info/feature/42A#2/23.2/152.6).
>
> Methodologically, it might be a good idea to find a set of features first
> and then think about a name of the "linguistic area" you may have found.
>
> Best,
>
> Andi
>
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 04. Januar 2021 um 11:10 Uhr
> *Von:* "JOO, Ian [Student]" <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk>
> <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk>
> *An:* "LINGTYP" <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
> <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [Lingtyp] New name for "Mainland Northeast Asia"
> Dear Andi, dear all,
>
> thank you Andi, for pointing that out.
> It seems that some are concerned with the terms “inner” and “outer”
> because it may have some connotation as a value judgement (more important
> v. less important). So this needs to be fixed.
> I appreciate your suggestion of the terms “central” and “peripheral” but
> to me, the word “peripheral” seems equally risky in terms of value
> judgement connotation: The Cambridge dictionary defines “peripheral” as
> "Something that is peripheral is not as important as something else”.
> I will think of several other options such as “Micro/Macro”,
> “Narrow/Wide”, “Small/Big”, etc. All other suggestions are welcome.
> (Or perhaps I will have to go with my previously suggested name
> “Astragalia”, if necessary.)
>
> As for Andi’s comment why we need this areal classification in the first
> place, well that’s what my doctoral research is trying to justify, and I
> already have several linguistic features that are found in this area but
> generally not in the surrounding areas, such as:
>
>    1. The colexification between NORTH and REAR (as previously discussed);
>    2. Isomorphic pronoun/determiner alternation of demonstratives (such
>    as English “*This *is a book”/“*This *book”);
>    3. The presence of velar nasal only at the coda position;
>    4. Monomorphemic 1PL pronouns;
>    5. Isomorphimic passive/causative alternation (e. g. Mandarin *ràng*);
>    6. Differential Object Marking by marked v. unmarked accusatives;
>    7. The presence of falling diphthongs.
>
> Hopefully I will continue to find out more during my doctoral years. I
> hope this helps and any comments are of course welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Ian
> On 4 Jan 2021, 5:40 PM +0800, hoelzlandreas at web.de <hoelzlandreas at web.de>
> <hoelzlandreas at web.de>, wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Johanna is correct in pointing out Janhunen's book. Manchuria is certainly
> a problematic term due to its association with Manchukuo, but it is still
> employed in academic literature outside of China where the term
> dōngběi 东北 'Northeast' is used instead. But it seems to me that the area
> under investigation here is slightly different from what is usually
> referred to as Manchuria. The blue area excludes those parts of Manchuria
> that since 1858/60 became part of Russia (Primorye region, Sakhalin, etc.)
> but includes large parts of Northern China and Mongolia. As for Northeast
> Asia, there is also a very different definition by Chard, Janhunen, myself,
> and ohters that is much broader and also includes Northern Asia. Janhunen
> refers to this as "wider" Northeast Asia:
>
> "In the widest sense, Northeast Asia as a geographical and ethnohistorical
> region can be defined as the entire northeastern part of the Eurasian
> continent, delimited by the Yenisei in the west and the Yellow River in the
> south. In the northeast, the region extends, in principle, to the Bering
> Strait. In a somewhat narrower framework, Northeast Asia may be defined as
> comprising the territory between the Amur and Yellow River basins,
> including the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese Islands in the Pacific
> coastal zone, but excluding the northeasternmost limits of what is today
> the Russian Far East." (Janhunen 2010)
>
> What Janhunen calls "narrow" Northeast Asia is close to the area you are
> interested in but includes Japan and other parts of "Pacific Northeast
> Asia" as Zgusta calls it.
>
> I would also avoid using "inner" and "outer", which might have unwanted
> connotations of being included and excluded, etc. Concerning "boreal" and
> "austral" proposed by Dan Slobin, I agree that the terms would be more
> neutral. But if I understood you correctly, "Outer Northeast Asia" would be
> the surrounding area on all sides and not only to the South. In this case,
> "central" and "peripheral" might be more adequate. But some parts on your
> map are also part of peripheral Mainland Southeast Asia as was pointed out
> by Hilário de Sousa.
>
> The main question would be, of course, why you need a term for this area
> in the first place.
>
> Best,
>
> Andi
>
>
>
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 03. Januar 2021 um 23:44 Uhr
> *Von:* "Bohnemeyer, Juergen" <jb77 at buffalo.edu> <jb77 at buffalo.edu>
> *An:* "Johanna Nichols" <johanna at berkeley.edu> <johanna at berkeley.edu>
> *Cc:* "LINGTYP" <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
> <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [Lingtyp] New name for "Mainland Northeast Asia"
> “Manchuria” strikes me politically/historically fraught due to its
> association with Manchukuo. But, I’m about as far from being an expert on
> this region as a typologist can be, so what do I know! — Best — Juergen
>
> > On Jan 3, 2021, at 4:10 PM, Johanna Nichols <johanna at berkeley.edu>
> <johanna at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Janhunen 1996 uses the term Manchuria for this area and covers its
> ethnohistory and linguistic history so comprehensively that I consider it a
> precedent for using that term.
> >
> > Janhunen, Juha. Manchuria: An ethnic history. Helsinki:
> Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1996.
> >
> > Johanna
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Dan I. SLOBIN <slobin at berkeley.edu>
> <slobin at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > "Inner" and "outer" convey an implicit hierarchy: some are in and some
> are out; some are central and some are peripheral.
> > I suggest a simple, objective solution, avoiding the repetition of names
> of compass directions, and avoiding what may
> > be seen as value judgments: Boreal Northeast Asia and Austral Southeast
> Asia -- i.e., North and South, using Latin terms.
> > I don't think these terms are opaque: "Boreal" will, for some people,
> evoke "Aurora Borealis," the Northern Lights;
> > "Austral" will evoke southerly geography, as in Austronesia and
> Australia.
> >
> > Dan Slobin
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 3:28 AM JOO, Ian [Student]
> <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk> <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > (I’m sorry if no one cares, but just for the update)
> > Although no one suggested any alternatives, I gave it a thought and
> changed the terms “Mainland Northeast Asia” to “Inner Northeast Asia” (as
> opposed to “Outer Northeast Asia”, i. e. the rest of Northeast Asia).
> > Below is a visualized map of Inner and Outher Northeast Asia.
> >
> > <Attachment.tiff>
> >
> > From Hong Kong,
> > Ian
> > On 31 Dec 2020, 6:13 PM +0800, JOO, Ian [Student]
> <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk> <ian.joo at connect.polyu.hk>, wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> In my doctoral research, I refer to the lingistic area consisting of
> Korea, Mongolia, and Northeast China (but not Japan or Russian Far East) as
> "Mainland Northeast Asia."
> >> But this name is problematic, since Siberia is just as continental
> (part of "mainland") as well, and I don't intend to include Siberia.
> >> Because of this, I have been thinking of a better name for this area.
> >> The best one I can think of is Astragalia, from the name of the herb
> astragalus, which is native to Korea, Northeast China, Mongolia, and
> Southern Siberia.
> >> The downside of this fancy name is that, upon hearing it, whoever not
> familiar with herbalism will have no idea where it points to, without
> further explanation.
> >> Are there any other name candidates you can think of? If so, I would
> welcome all suggestions.
> >>
> >> From Hong Kong,
> >> Ian
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Disclaimer:
> >>
> >>
> >> This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the
> sender and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (the University)
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or
> the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.
> >>
> >> The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy
> or quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities.
> Any views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not
> necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no
> liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any
> party as a result of the use of such information.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer:
> >
> >
> > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the
> sender and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (the University)
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or
> the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.
> >
> > The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy
> or quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities.
> Any views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not
> necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no
> liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any
> party as a result of the use of such information.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lingtyp mailing list
> > Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> > http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
> >
> >
> > --
> > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> > Dan I. Slobin
> > Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Linguistics
> > University of California, Berkeley
> > email: slobin at berkeley.edu
> > https://danslobin.academia.edu/
> > address: 2323 Rose St., Berkeley, CA 94708
> > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> >
> > I acknowledge that the UC-Berkeley campus is on the traditional,
> > ancestral, and unceded land of the Ohlone people.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lingtyp mailing list
> > Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> > http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lingtyp mailing list
> > Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> > http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
>
> --
> Juergen Bohnemeyer (He/Him)
> Professor, Department of Linguistics
> University at Buffalo
>
> Office: 642 Baldy Hall, UB North Campus
> Mailing address: 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
> Phone: (716) 645 0127
> Fax: (716) 645 3825
> Email: jb77 at buffalo.edu
> Web: http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/
>
> Office hours will be held by Zoom. Email me to schedule a call at any
> time. I will in addition hold Tu/Th 4-5pm open specifically for remote
> office hours.
>
> There’s A Crack In Everything - That’s How The Light Gets In
> (Leonard Cohen)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
>
> *Disclaimer:*
>
>
>
> *This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the
> sender and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (the University)
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or
> the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.*
>
> *The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy or
> quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities. Any
> views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not
> necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no
> liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any
> party as a result of the use of such information.*
> _______________________________________________ Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
>
> *Disclaimer:*
>
> *This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the
> sender and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (the University)
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or
> the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.*
>
> *The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy or
> quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities. Any
> views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not
> necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no
> liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any
> party as a result of the use of such information.*
>
>
> *Disclaimer:*
>
> *This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the
> sender and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (the University)
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or
> the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.*
>
> *The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy or
> quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities. Any
> views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not
> necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no
> liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any
> party as a result of the use of such information.*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing listLingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.orghttp://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
>
> --
> Martin Haspelmath
> Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
> Deutscher Platz 6
> D-04103 Leipzighttps://www.shh.mpg.de/employees/42385/25522
>
>
> *Disclaimer:*
>
> *This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
> information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you should delete this message and notify the
> sender and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (the University)
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or
> the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.*
>
> *The University specifically denies any responsibility for the accuracy or
> quality of information obtained through University E-mail Facilities. Any
> views and opinions expressed are only those of the author(s) and do not
> necessarily represent those of the University and the University accepts no
> liability whatsoever for any losses or damages incurred or caused to any
> party as a result of the use of such information.*
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> http://listserv.linguistlist.org/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>


-- 

*<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> *

*Dan I. Slobin *

*Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Linguistics*

*University of California, Berkeley*

*email: slobin at berkeley.edu <slobin at berkeley.edu>*


*https://danslobin.academia.edu/ <https://danslobin.academia.edu/>*

*address: 2323 Rose St., Berkeley, CA 94708*


*<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> *



*I acknowledge that the UC-Berkeley campus is on the traditional, *


*ancestral, and unceded land of the Ohlone people. *


*[image: Chochenyo Ohlone - Reviving Lost Languages]*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20210104/8e76989a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ?????????? 2021-01-05 ????? 3.05.05.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32246 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20210104/8e76989a/attachment.png>