[Lingtyp] Polarity reversal and counterfactual conditionals
Jesus Francisco Olguin Martinez
olguinmartinez at ucsb.edu
Sun Mar 6 02:38:16 UTC 2022
I hope this message finds you well.
As you know, counterfactual conditionals involve *polarity reversal*, that
is, they involve a situation with the opposite polarity to what is marked,
as in the following examples:
1. If I had gone, I would have seen her
[I did not go, I did not see her]
2. If I hadn't gone, I would have not seen her.
[I did go, I did see her]
Polarity reversal tends to be inferred in counterfactual conditionals, as
in the examples shown above. However, there are various languages in which
polarity reversal must be explicitly indicated:
3. If I had gone, I would have seen her, (*BUT) I DID NOT (SEE HER)*.
I have various hypotheses regarding why these languages may indicate
explicitly polarity reversal in this type of construction.
I was wondering if you are aware of any studies that have explored this
domain and/or any languages that have this type of construction.
Thank you very much in advance!
Jesús Olguín Martínez
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Linguistics
*University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Lingtyp