[Lingtyp] semantics of object clauses of perception verbs

[Christian Lehmann]

Many thanks, Anna.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Am 28.08.2023 um 00:48 schrieb Anna Sjöberg:
>
> Horie (2001) contains a section on the semantics of different 
> complementation strategies, including terminology. Direct vs. indirect 
> perception or event vs. proposition**perception (also *second-order 
> vs. third-order entities *(Lyons 1989)) are mentioned, also *percept. 
> vs concept* (Bolinger 1971) and *immediate perception constructions 
> vs. mental perception constructions* (Dik & Hengeveld 1991).
>
>
> Best,
>
> Anna Sjöberg
>
>
> Bolinger, Dwight. 1974. "Concept and percept: two infinitive 
> constructions and their vicissitudes". In: World papers in phonetics: 
> festschrift for Dr. Onishi's kizyu. Tokyo: The Phonetic Society of 
> Japan, 65— 91.
>
>
> Dik, Simon C. & Hengeveld, Kees. 1991. "The hierarchical structure of 
> the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements". 
> Linguistics 29: 231-259.
>
>
> Horie, Kaoru. 2001. Complement clauses. In: Haspelmath, Martin, 
> Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), 
> Language Typology and Language Universals : An International Handbook 
> vol 2, 979-993. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter
>
>
> Lyons, John. 1989. "Semantic ascent: a neglected aspect of syntactic 
> typology". In: Arnold, Doug & Atkinson, Martin & Durand, Jacques & 
> Grover, Claire & Sadler, Louisa, (eds.). Essays on grammatical theory 
> and universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 153 — 186.
>
-- 

Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann
Rudolfstr. 4
99092 Erfurt
Deutschland

Tel.: 	+49/361/2113417
E-Post: 	christianw_lehmann at arcor.de
Web: 	https://www.christianlehmann.eu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20230828/d99d5ac9/attachment.htm>