[Lingtyp] classification of possessive noun phrases

[Nicholas Evans]

Dear Sergey,

You might find the attached paper relevant. We tried to extend the Nichols typology of head vs dependent marking to take in the type of information that is there – is it about the head, the dependent, both or neither? That generates a large and interesting set of possibilities, many quite rare and some still unattested.

Best Nick

Nicholas (Nick) Evans

Director, CoEDL (ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language)

Coombs Building, Fellows Road
CHL, CAP, Australian National University

nicholas.evans at anu.edu.au

I acknowledge the Ngunnawal people as custodians of the land on which I work, and pay my respects to their elders, past and present. Their custodianship has never been ceded.

________________________________
From: Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of Sergey Loesov via Lingtyp <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2024 3:59 AM
To: LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Subject: [Lingtyp] classification of possessive noun phrases


Dear Colleagues,

Are you aware of any recent (post- Koptevskaya-Tamm 2002) studies on the types of semantic relationships between heads and dependents in possessive noun phrases, particularly in relation to the correlation between synthetic and analytical methods of encoding these relationships within an NP?

Best wishes,

Sergey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20241003/8fa0c3eb/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Evans2013FenwickMarkingTypology.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 353652 bytes
Desc: Evans2013FenwickMarkingTypology.pdf
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20241003/8fa0c3eb/attachment-0001.pdf>