[Lingtyp] actionality and transitivity
Juergen Bohnemeyer
jb77 at buffalo.edu
Mon Oct 21 16:48:29 UTC 2024
Dear Sergey – The first such synthesis was attempted by Dowty (1979). But Dowty’s approach proved flawed in several ways. Thus (from memory), he assumed that all state change descriptions are telic, ignoring the problem of ‘degree achievements’ such as _grow_ and _ascend_ or _rise_, and that all accomplishments are causative, etc. These problems are discussed and addressed in Van Valin & LaPolla (1997). Cf. also Bohnemeyer (2004) for further discussion and an independent approach. – Best – Juergen
Bohnemeyer, J. (2004). Split intransitivity, linking, and lexical representation: the case of Yukatek Maya. Linguistics 42(1): 67-107.
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. & R. J. LaPolla. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Juergen Bohnemeyer (He/Him)
Professor, Department of Linguistics
University at Buffalo
Office: 642 Baldy Hall, UB North Campus
Mailing address: 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260
Phone: (716) 645 0127
Fax: (716) 645 3825
Email: jb77 at buffalo.edu<mailto:jb77 at buffalo.edu>
Web: http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~jb77/
Office hours Tu/Th 3:30-4:30pm in 642 Baldy or via Zoom (Meeting ID 585 520 2411; Passcode Hoorheh)
There’s A Crack In Everything - That’s How The Light Gets In
(Leonard Cohen)
--
From: Lingtyp <lingtyp-bounces at listserv.linguistlist.org> on behalf of Sergey Loesov via Lingtyp <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 at 11:56
To: LINGTYP at LISTSERV.LINGUISTLIST.ORG <lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org>
Subject: [Lingtyp] actionality and transitivity
Dear colleagues,
I am currently working on the verb morphosyntax (or “morphological semantics”) of Modern Western Aramaic, a relic language still spoken in the Qalamoun mountains of Syria. My aim is to develop a comprehensive classification that integrates Vendlerian actional classes with features such as syntactic transitivity and agentivity. This approach is driven by the evidence I have encountered so far.
Could you point me to any studies or attempts that classify verbs by combining these features?
Best wishes,
Sergey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20241021/25596e44/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list