[Lingtyp] once again about perfective vs. imperfective aspect
Christian Lehmann
christian.lehmann at uni-erfurt.de
Mon Aug 4 13:43:04 UTC 2025
Jürgen, quoting you:
> I have not actually seen a language that would be entirely free of
> morphosyntactic constraints on viewpoint aspectual interpretation.
> Even Finnish and German, the languages commonly cited as lacking
> grammaticalized viewpoint aspect markers, have a perfect form (which
> in German is most commonly used to express past reference, but retains
> polysemy as a post-state/time marker). Colloquial German in addition
> has a weakly grammaticalized progressive construction for atelic VPs.
>
First, a little dispute with you on this: Limiting our classification of
languages to a determined variety of a language, we shall say that the
progressive construction is alien to standard German. The more
interesting, because more general, question seems to be whether the
German perfect, apart from being a tense, has some aspectual value.
Let's say that this value consists in signalling relevance at topic
time. E.g.:
* Ich habe Joghurt gekauft. 'I bought yogurt [which is probably of
current interest to you].'
* Ich kaufte Joghurt. 'I bought yogurt [which is one of the things
that happened at that time].'
This is a semantic feature of the perfect in some other languages I have
seen. The question is: Does it come under the notion of aspect? Let
tense be the grammatical marking of the temporal relationship of a
situation to some temporal reference point, and aspect the grammatical
marking of the viewpoint taken as to the temporal structure of the
situation in itself; then current relevance appears to be related, if
anything, more closely to tense than to aspect. However, this is not
actually a logical situation of tertium non datur; there are some more
verbal categories, and for some of them we may even yet be lacking a
general concept.
--
Prof. em. Dr. Christian Lehmann
Rudolfstr. 4
99092 Erfurt
Deutschland
Tel.: +49/361/2113417
E-Post: christianw_lehmann at arcor.de
Web: https://www.christianlehmann.eu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20250804/f55f2d2c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list