[Lingtyp] most important works in generative typology
Guillaume Jacques
rgyalrongskad at gmail.com
Wed Jul 2 14:28:38 UTC 2025
In addition to the previous references, I think that Richard Kayne's work
also deserves mention, for instance the following book (and many of his
earlier publications):
https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/linguistics/documents/Kayne%200822%20-%20Questions%20of%20Syntax.pdf
Le mer. 2 juil. 2025 à 16:09, Neil Myler via Lingtyp <
lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org> a écrit :
> Although he's since moved on to Harvard, another UConn reference here
> would be Jonathan Bobaljik's 2012 "Universals in Comparative Morphology"
> book, as well as related work by him and his students on other syncretism
> and suppletion patterns, like:
> https://bobaljik.scholars.harvard.edu/sites/g/files/omnuum5076/files/bobaljik/files/smith2019_article_caseandnumbersuppletioninprono.pdf
>
> Best,
> Neil
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 7:19 AM Martin Haspelmath via Lingtyp <
> lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org> wrote:
>
>> I would also mention the work done at the University of Connecticut –
>> Željko Bošković has supervised quite a few interesting typological
>> dissertations over the last two decades:
>>
>> https://boskovic.linguistics.uconn.edu/teaching-advising/
>>
>> For a recent example of Željko's work, see his 2025 article on multiple
>> wh-fronting (in this LangSci volume:
>> https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/481).
>>
>> There's also a very interesting programmatic paper by Željko, on
>> "Formalism AND, not VS, functionalism", in which he says that the two
>> approaches are more compatible than is often thought (published in Belgrade
>> in 2022):
>> http://doi.fil.bg.ac.rs/pdf/eb_ser/belida/2022-1/belida-2022-1-ch1.pdf
>> (I have some comments on his paper on my blog:
>> https://dlc.hypotheses.org/2641).
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Martin
>> On 02.07.25 12:49, Adam James Ross Tallman via Lingtyp wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Trying to make a bibliography for my typology class. I was wondering what
>> people thought the most important works (say top 5-10) in generative
>> typology are in the past 20 years. In my mind this is mostly dominated by
>> Mark Baker's work, but I feel this impression might be out of date. I'd be
>> very interested in PhD theses (or work derived from these) in particular.
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adam J.R. Tallman
>> Post-doctoral Researcher
>> Friedrich Schiller Universität
>> Department of English Studies
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing listLingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.orghttps://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>>
>> --
>> Martin Haspelmath
>> Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
>> Deutscher Platz 6
>> D-04103 Leipzighttps://www.eva.mpg.de/linguistic-and-cultural-evolution/staff/martin-haspelmath/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lingtyp mailing list
>> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
>> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Lingtyp mailing list
> Lingtyp at listserv.linguistlist.org
> https://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lingtyp
>
--
Guillaume Jacques
Directeur de recherches
CNRS (CRLAO) - EPHE- INALCO
https://scholar.google.fr/citations?user=1XCp2-oAAAAJ&hl=fr
https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/295
<http://cnrs.academia.edu/GuillaumeJacques>
http://panchr.hypotheses.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/attachments/20250702/e5f416a6/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lingtyp
mailing list