6.1577, Qs: Corpus, Humor, Tone, Lang Lab

Wed Nov 8 14:53:20 UTC 1995

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-1577. Wed Nov 8 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  181

Subject: 6.1577, Qs: Corpus, Humor, Tone, Lang Lab

Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>

Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>

Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>

Editor for this issue: dseely at emunix.emich.edu (T. Daniel Seely)
                           REMINDER
[We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.]

---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 09:27:31 +0200
From:  jklindst at waltari.Helsinki.FI (Jan K Lindstrom)
Subject:  query on TEI

2)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 16:57:18 +0100
From:  ahousen at vnet3.vub.ac.be (Alex Housen)
Subject:  Humorous data

3)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 12:28:53 EST
From:  kkarins at unagi.cis.upenn.edu (Krisjanis Karins)
Subject:  Query: broken tone

4)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 15:48:24 EST
From:  amr1 at pooch1.allencol.edu (Antonio Medina-Rivera)
Subject:  Foreign Language Lab

---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 09:27:31 +0200
From:  jklindst at waltari.Helsinki.FI (Jan K Lindstrom)
Subject:  query on TEI

Hello there,

I have a question related to corpus compilation and coding.

I have been doing -- and, in principle, completed -- work on a corpus
of modern Finland Swedish at the department of Scandinavian languages,
University of Helsinki. The corpus consists now of written texts of
various kinds and comprises ca 2.5 million tokens. If you are interested
in this source of information, contact me directly.

However, this is not supposed to be any launching information about the
FISC-corpus but, really, a modest query.

I am carrying out the final documentation of the project
and there is one peculiarity of TEI-coding (P3) that has puzzled me.
What does the attribute "gi" stand for, that is supposed to be used,
for instance, in the tags declaration in the corpus header? For example
as follows:  <tagUsage gi=hi>  where "hi" is 'highlighted'. Could
anyone provide an explanation? We would like to follow the guidelines
but it feels stupid to use a code you do not really understand. P3 seems
rather cryptic on this detail.

Many thanks  -	Jan Lindstrom
		P.O. Box 4
		00014 University of Helsinki
		Finland
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 16:57:18 +0100
From:  ahousen at vnet3.vub.ac.be (Alex Housen)
Subject:  Humorous data

Last May I posted a message to this list asking for references to the
investigation of verbal humour (a summary of the replies was posted on June
21st).  This query was posted on behalf of a student of mine who wants to
do her thesis on verbal humour in conversation.  She will try to identify
what it is that makes a particular utterance or turn in a conversation
witty, funny, etc.
A study of the literature has revealed that much of the empirical work on
this topic is based on non-spontaneous data (e.g. from film or comedy
scripts, plays, etc.).  We would like to extend the investigation to
spontaneous data.
However, collecting spontaneous *English* conversation with sufficient
humorous passages in Belgium has proven problematic (the data have to be
English data because the thesis is part of the requirements for a degree in
English).
Hence my question:  Does anyone know of an English corpus that would lend
itself to such a study?

Thank you very much in advance.

- Alex Housen
University of Brussels (VUB), Belgium
ahousen at vnet3.vub.ac.be

__________________________________________________________
Dr. Alex HOUSEN                             Germanic Languages Dept.
University of Brussels (VUB)         Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Tel:+32-2-6292664; Fax:+32-2-6292480; email:ahousen at vnet3.vub.ac.be
__________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 12:28:53 EST
From:  kkarins at unagi.cis.upenn.edu (Krisjanis Karins)
Subject:  Query: broken tone

I was wondering if anyone was aware of a language with a "broken tone"
besides Danish and Latvian.

The "broken tone" in Latvian is one of three contrastive syllable
intonations:

level	   characterized by a level tone or a slight rise in tone
falling	   characterized by a fall in tone
broken	   characterized by a glottal catch in the middle of the syllable,
	   or laryngealization of the latter part of the syllable, combined
	   with a fall in tone.

The Latvian broken tone has been likened to Danish stoed.

I would be interested in finding out about the phonetics and/or
phonology of any other language besides Danish and Latvian which has
such a "broken tone".  Bibliographic references would be wonderful.

Please send your replies to me directly:  kkarins at unagi.cis.upenn.edu

Thanks in advance,
Krisjanis Karins

------------------------------------------------------------------------
4)
Date:  Tue, 07 Nov 1995 15:48:24 EST
From:  amr1 at pooch1.allencol.edu (Antonio Medina-Rivera)
Subject:  Foreign Language Lab

To: All people working or related to language labs:
From: Antonio Medina-Rivera
      Allentown College of St. Francis de Sales

We're in the process of designing a language lab for our college.  Our
current language is old fashion and we would like to get more modern
according to the new technology.  I'm consulting all people who have been
in the situation of modernizing their language lab.  I have the following
questions:

What is the best arrangement/configuration for a language lab?  Is the way
the lab is arranged really important?

What kind of hardware/software more convenient for learning a second
language?  Who provides better software for teaching a second language
MAC or IBM?

Does the CD-ROM software really work to learn a second language?

According to your experience, how is the ideal  language lab?

Specify what kind of technology for teaching a second language do you
have?  It is really working?  Yes or No and Why?

When your institution decided to create a language lab did they do it
from the point of view of the technicians or did they also take into
consideration the point of view of people teaching a second language?

I hope to receive your input on this matter.  You can write to:

		amr1 at pooch1.allencol.edu
						Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-1577.