6.1618, Qs: Q? position PPs?, URLs, Pronunciation Dictionary

[The Linguist List]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-1618. Wed Nov 15 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  128
 
Subject: 6.1618, Qs: Q? position PPs?, URLs, Pronunciation Dictionary
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: avaldez at emunix.emich.edu (Annemarie Valdez)
                           REMINDER
[We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.]
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 15 Nov 1995 08:03:56 EST
From:  decaen at epas.utoronto.ca (Vincent DeCaen)
Subject:  Q? position PPs?
 
2)
Date:  Wed, 15 Nov 1995 12:58:45 +0100
From:  he229bu at uni-duisburg.de (Elisabeth Burr)
Subject:  Query: URLs
 
3)
Date:  Wed, 15 Nov 1995 13:40:56 EST
From:  PATERJV at QUCDN.QueensU.CA
Subject:  Machine Readable Pronunciation Dictionary
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 15 Nov 1995 08:03:56 EST
From:  decaen at epas.utoronto.ca (Vincent DeCaen)
Subject:  Q? position PPs?
 
as modifiers, APs and PPs apparently have quite a different status, as
revealed by the study of nominal syntax: a) APs are somehow privileged
or "inner" vs PPs; b) PPs are somehow "outside" with respect to DET,
assuming a DP; etc.
 
my question: the facts I'm dealing with, especially in Welsh nominal
syntax, would be explained if the following were a canonical structure
(for a two member nominal chain):
 
		DP
	    /	    \
	D'		PP
    /	    \
D		NP
	    /	    \
	N'		NP
    /	    \		|   \
N'		AP	N'	AP
|			|
N			N
	
can anyone see something wrong with this structure, or some odd
consequences/predictions I haven't anticipated? it ensures that while
the PP is necessarily last in linear order, it unambiguously modifies
the head of the nominal chain (or does it?).
 
is there empiricial disconfirmation from other languages for PP as
sister D' vs N' ??
 
does anyone have a suggestion, assuming this is a viable structure,
for why APs differ radically from PPs in this respect? e.g., something
around features +/-N ??  I would hate the stipulation.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Vincent DeCaen		 	  decaen at epas.utoronto.ca
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date:  Wed, 15 Nov 1995 12:58:45 +0100
From:  he229bu at uni-duisburg.de (Elisabeth Burr)
Subject:  Query: URLs
 
 
Dear all,
a few days ago, the list newjourn announced the www-page of De Proverbio and
the www-page of Do Madeira. As I have erraneously trashed them, I would be
really thankful, if somebody who kept the URLs could send them along to me.
Greetings
Elisabeth Burr
Dr. phil. Elisabeth Burr
FB3/Romanistik
Gerhard-Mercator Universitaet-GH
Lotharstrasse 65
47048 Duisburg
Tel.: +49 203 3792605
Fax.: +49 203 3792612
e-mail: he229bu at uni-duisburg.de
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
Date:  Wed, 15 Nov 1995 13:40:56 EST
From:  PATERJV at QUCDN.QueensU.CA
Subject:  Machine Readable Pronunciation Dictionary
 
In order to develop a utility for CHILDES (Child Language Data
Exchange System) Brian MacWhinney and I are looking for a machine
readable pronunciation dictionary of English.
 
The utility would generate a phonetic transcription of an orthographic
model, in order to create a %mod tier for analysis of child phonology.
 
What is required is simply an ASCII word list, with phonetic
transcriptions.
 
The dictionary would have to be in the public domain, or else we would
need the permission of the copyright owners to adapt the dictionary for
this purpose.
 
Any suggestions about where we might be able to track down such a
dictionary would be welcome.
 
Thanks, Joe Pater
e-mail: paterjv at qucdn.queensu.ca
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-1618.