6.1251, Qs: Synt.tree terminology, Poolshark, Braille IPA, Baby-talk

The Linguist List linguist at tam2000.tamu.edu
Fri Sep 15 05:09:04 UTC 1995


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List:  Vol-6-1251. Fri Sep 15 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875. Lines:  114
 
Subject: 6.1251, Qs: Synt.tree terminology, Poolshark, Braille IPA, Baby-talk
 
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
            Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Associate Editor:  Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin at emunix.emich.edu>
Assistant Editors: Ron Reck <rreck at emunix.emich.edu>
                   Ann Dizdar <dizdar at tam2000.tamu.edu>
                   Annemarie Valdez <avaldez at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
 
Editor for this issue: lveselin at emunix.emich.edu (Ljuba Veselinova)
                           REMINDER
[We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually
best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is
then  strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list.   This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we
would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.]
 
---------------------------------Directory-----------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 13 Sep 1995 19:54:26 MDT
From:  r.hudson at linguistics.ucl.ac.uk (Richard Hudson)
Subject:  mothers and daughters
 
2)
Date:  Wed, 13 Sep 1995 22:01:40
From:  katz at uniserve.com (Mack Bud)
Subject:  Poolshark
 
3)
Date:  Thu, 14 Sep 1995 11:01:54 EDT
From:  debyj at gusun.acc.georgetown.edu (Jeff Deby)
Subject:  Braille IPA
 
4)
Date:  Thu, 14 Sep 1995 19:43:48 PDT
From:  nicoju at IMAP2.ASU.EDU
Subject:  baby-talk
 
---------------------------------Messages------------------------------------
1)
Date:  Wed, 13 Sep 1995 19:54:26 MDT
From:  r.hudson at linguistics.ucl.ac.uk (Richard Hudson)
Subject:  mothers and daughters
 
Another question about kinship terms, but this time about theoretical
syntax. Does anyone know why we talk about relations in a phrase-structure
tree in terms of mothers, daughters, etc?
 
a. Why not fathers, sons, etc? Or parents, children, etc?
 
b. Why these terms at all, given that syntactic `daughters' are *parts* of
their `mothers'? Is it just because of the family tree model?
 
c. If it is family trees that are behind the metaphor, why aren't we worried
by the fact that everyone has *two* parents?
 ===========================================================================
Prof Richard Hudson                           Tel: +44 171 387 7050 ext 3152
                                             E-mail: r.hudson at ling.ucl.ac.uk
Dept. of Phonetics and Linguistics                     Tel: +44 171 380 7172
                                                       Fax: +44 171 383 4108
UCL
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
UK
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2)
Date:  Wed, 13 Sep 1995 22:01:40
From:  katz at uniserve.com (Mack Bud)
Subject:  Poolshark
 
I wondering where the word poolshark originated before Friday
any help will be greatly appreciated.
               Thanks,
                Mack Bud
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3)
Date:  Thu, 14 Sep 1995 11:01:54 EDT
From:  debyj at gusun.acc.georgetown.edu (Jeff Deby)
Subject:  Braille IPA
 
 
I seem to recall a question about a Braille version of IPA sometime in
the last year, and only now that it's become relevant for me do I wish I had
paid attention to the answer, if one was posted.  If anyone is aware of
Braille versions of the IPA, I'd be grateful if (s)he would drop me a
line to let me know where I can find a copy of it.
 
Jeff Deby
Georgetown University
debyj at gusun.georgetown.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4)
Date:  Thu, 14 Sep 1995 19:43:48 PDT
From:  nicoju at IMAP2.ASU.EDU
Subject:  baby-talk
 
 
Dear linguists,
 
I need information about ALL which concerns baby-talk: prosody, discourse
analysis, grammar, psycholinguistics, pedagogy, etc... Thank you for
sending your references, I will send a summary to the list.
 
Julie Nicole
Departement of languages et literature
Arizona State University
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-6-1251.



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list