7.1811, Disc: Analogy
linguist at linguistlist.org
linguist at linguistlist.org
Sat Dec 21 14:29:08 UTC 1996
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-1811. Sat Dec 21 1996. ISSN: 1068-4875.
Subject: 7.1811, Disc: Analogy
Moderators: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar: Texas A&M U. <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Dry: Eastern Michigan U. <hdry at linguistlist.org>
T. Daniel Seely: Eastern Michigan U. <seely at linguistlist.org>
Review Editor: Andrew Carnie <carnie at linguistlist.org>
Associate Editors: Ljuba Veselinova <ljuba at linguistlist.org>
Ann Dizdar <ann at linguistlist.org>
Assistant Editor: Sue Robinson <sue at linguistlist.org>
Technical Editor: Ron Reck <ron at linguistlist.org>
Software development: John H. Remmers <remmers at emunix.emich.edu>
Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <seely at linguistlist.org>
=================================Directory=================================
1)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 09:36:31 -0500
From: ocls at ipa.net (George Elgin, Suzette Haden Elgin)
Subject: analogy
2)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:28:00 EST
From: "Ellen F. Prince" <ellen at central.cis.upenn.edu>
Subject: analogy
-------------------------------- Message 1 -------------------------------
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 09:36:31 -0500
From: ocls at ipa.net (George Elgin, Suzette Haden Elgin)
Subject: analogy
It seems to me that poetry demonstrates beyond question that any analogy
whatsoever may "happen" and probably will, and that the relevant question
is which analogies *persist* in a language, not which ones happen. And that
- as Benji Wald points out -- this is independent of questions about how
analogy may figure in Universal Grammar and similarly farflung
neurolocales.
Suzette Haden Elgin
-------------------------------- Message 2 -------------------------------
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:28:00 EST
From: "Ellen F. Prince" <ellen at central.cis.upenn.edu>
Subject: analogy
i got this in an email msg today (from a non-linguist):
'My RAV4 finally got off the boat!
I went to the importer's yard to look for it today. Thought maybe it
was one of 'a few' blue ones. Imagine my surprise when I saw all
^^^^^^^^^
of them blue (with only a few aquamarine)!!! So I don't know which
^^^^^^^^^^^^
one is actually mine...'
notice, btw, that it does not have the causative sense the earlier
discussions assumed it would have. also please note that i am not
making any claims that analogy had anything to do with this
utterance -- just thought it might amuse/interest you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-7-1811
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list